Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gregory R. Grant
dblp:43/1016
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0139-7658ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 12 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
8 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 99% Computational science and engineering · 1% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis |
0.5 | 2 | 2018 | Outlier detection for improved differential splicing quantification from RNA-Seq experiments with replicates · Bioinform. 2018 Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics |
0.2 | 2 | 2015 | Benchmark analysis of algorithms for determining and quantifying full-length mRNA splice forms from RNA-seq data · Bioinform. 2015 Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes · Bioinform. 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
differential expression analysis |
0.2 | 3 | 2009 | A flexible two-stage procedure for identifying gene sets that are differentially expressed · Bioinform. 2009 A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data · Bioinform. 2005 Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes · Bioinform. 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis |
0.1 | 2 | 2009 | A flexible two-stage procedure for identifying gene sets that are differentially expressed · Bioinform. 2009 A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › multiple sequence alignment › alignment quality assessment
alignment benchmark |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
read mapping |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › read mapping
spliced alignment |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics › functional enrichment analysis
gene set enrichment analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A flexible two-stage procedure for identifying gene sets that are differentially expressed · Bioinform. 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
data integration |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioinformatics infrastructure
gene expression data management |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studies · Bioinform. 2004 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics › RNA splicing analysis
splice junction detection |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM) · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › gene expression pattern analysis
gene expression pattern discovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genes · Bioinform. 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Significance testing for genomic mismatch scanning · RECOMB 1999 |
Computational science and engineering
statistical significance testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Significance testing for genomic mismatch scanning · RECOMB 1999 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.3probabilistic modeling · 0.3sanger sequencing · 0.1RT-PCR · 0.1false discovery rate · 0.1permutation testing · 0.1SAM · 0.1PaGE · 0.1ontology-based annotation · 0.0MAGE-ML · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Generating correlated data for omics simulationabstractSimulation of realistic omics data is a key input for benchmarking studies that help users obtain optimal computational pipelines. Omics data involves large numbers of measured features on each sample and these measures are generally correlated with each other. However, simulation too often ignores these correlations, perhaps due to computational and statistical hurdles of doing so. To alleviate this, we describe three approaches for generating omics-scale data with correlated measures which mimic real datasets. These approaches are all based on a Gaussian copula approach with a covariance matrix that decomposes into a diagonal part and a low-rank part. This decomposition allows for extremely efficient simulation, overcoming a hurdle for adoption of past methods. We use these approaches to demonstrate the importance of including correlation in two benchmarking applications. First, we show that variance of results from the popular DESeq2 method increases when dependence is included. Second, we demonstrate that CYCLOPS, a method for inferring circadian time of collection from transcriptomics, improves in performance when given gene-gene dependencies in some circumstances. We provide an R package, dependentsimr, that has efficient implementations of these methods and can generate dependent data with arbitrary marginal distributions, including discrete (binary, ordered categorical, Poisson, negative binomial), continuous (normal), or with an empirical distribution. Gregory R. Grant, Thomas G. Brooks |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 2 |
| 2024 | BEERS2: RNA-Seq simulation through high fidelity in silico modelingabstractSimulation of RNA-seq reads is critical in the assessment, comparison, benchmarking and development of bioinformatics tools. Yet the field of RNA-seq simulators has progressed little in the last decade. To address this need we have developed BEERS2, which combines a flexible and highly configurable design with detailed simulation of the entire library preparation and sequencing pipeline. BEERS2 takes input transcripts (typically fully length messenger RNA transcripts with polyA tails) from either customizable input or from CAMPAREE simulated RNA samples. It produces realistic reads of these transcripts as FASTQ, SAM or BAM formats with the SAM or BAM formats containing the true alignment to the reference genome. It also produces true transcript-level quantification values. BEERS2 combines a flexible and highly configurable design with detailed simulation of the entire library preparation and sequencing pipeline and is designed to include the effects of polyA selection and RiboZero for ribosomal depletion, hexamer priming sequence biases, GC-content biases in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, barcode read errors and errors during PCR amplification. These characteristics combine to make BEERS2 the most complete simulation of RNA-seq to date. Finally, we demonstrate the use of BEERS2 by measuring the effect of several settings on the popular Salmon pseudoalignment algorithm. Thomas G. Brooks, Nicholas F. Lahens, Antonijo Mrcela, Dimitra Sarantopoulou, Soumyashant Nayak, Amruta Naik, Shaon Sengupta, Peter S. Choi, Gregory R. Grant |
Briefings Bioinform. | 9 |
| 2021 | Comparative evaluation of full-length isoform quantification from RNA-SeqabstractBACKGROUND: Full-length isoform quantification from RNA-Seq is a key goal in transcriptomics analyses and has been an area of active development since the beginning. The fundamental difficulty stems from the fact that RNA transcripts are long, while RNA-Seq reads are short. RESULTS: Here we use simulated benchmarking data that reflects many properties of real data, including polymorphisms, intron signal and non-uniform coverage, allowing for systematic comparative analyses of isoform quantification accuracy and its impact on differential expression analysis. Genome, transcriptome and pseudo alignment-based methods are included; and a simple approach is included as a baseline control. CONCLUSIONS: Salmon, kallisto, RSEM, and Cufflinks exhibit the highest accuracy on idealized data, while on more realistic data they do not perform dramatically better than the simple approach. We determine the structural parameters with the greatest impact on quantification accuracy to be length and sequence compression complexity and not so much the number of isoforms. The effect of incomplete annotation on performance is also investigated. Overall, the tested methods show sufficient divergence from the truth to suggest that full-length isoform quantification and isoform level DE should still be employed selectively. Dimitra Sarantopoulou, Thomas G. Brooks, Soumyashant Nayak, Antonijo Mrcela, Nicholas F. Lahens, Gregory R. Grant |
BMC Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2018 | Outlier detection for improved differential splicing quantification from RNA-Seq experiments with replicatesabstractMotivation: A key component in many RNA-Seq-based studies is contrasting multiple replicates from different experimental conditions. In this setup, replicates play a key role as they allow to capture underlying biological variability inherent to the compared conditions, as well as experimental variability. However, what constitutes a 'bad' replicate is not necessarily well defined. Consequently, researchers might discard valuable data or downstream analysis may be hampered by failed experiments. Results: Here we develop a probability model to weigh a given RNA-Seq sample as a representative of an experimental condition when performing alternative splicing analysis. We demonstrate that this model detects outlier samples which are consistently and significantly different compared with other samples from the same condition. Moreover, we show that instead of discarding such samples the proposed weighting scheme can be used to downweight samples and specific splicing variations suspected as outliers, gaining statistical power. These weights can then be used for differential splicing (DS) analysis, where the resulting algorithm offers a generalization of the MAJIQ algorithm. Using both synthetic and real-life data, we perform an extensive evaluation of the improved MAJIQ algorithm in different scenarios involving perturbed samples, mislabeled samples, same condition groups, and different levels of coverage, showing it compares favorably to other tools. Overall, this work offers an outlier detection algorithm that can be combined with any splicing pipeline, a generalized and improved version of MAJIQ for DS detection, and evaluation metrics with matching code and data for DS algorithms. Availability and implementation: Software and data are accessible via majiq.biociphers.org/norton_et_al_2017/. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Scott S. Norton, Jorge Vaquero-Garcia, Nicholas F. Lahens, Gregory R. Grant, Yoseph Barash |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2017 | Histone posttranslational modifications predict specific alternative exon subtypes in mammalian brainabstractA compelling body of literature, based on next generation chromatin immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing of reward brain regions indicates that the regulation of the epigenetic landscape likely underlies chronic drug abuse and addiction. It is now critical to develop highly innovative computational strategies to reveal the relevant regulatory transcriptional mechanisms that may underlie neuropsychiatric disease. We have analyzed chromatin regulation of alternative splicing, which is implicated in cocaine exposure in mice. Recent literature has described chromatin-regulated alternative splicing, suggesting a novel function for drug-induced neuroepigenetic remodeling. However, the extent of the genome-wide association between particular histone modifications and alternative splicing remains unexplored. To address this, we have developed novel computational approaches to model the association between alternative splicing and histone posttranslational modifications in the nucleus accumbens (NAc), a brain reward region. Using classical statistical methods and machine learning to combine ChIP-Seq and RNA-Seq data, we found that specific histone modifications are strongly associated with various aspects of differential splicing. H3K36me3 and H3K4me1 have the strongest association with splicing indicating they play a significant role in alternative splicing in brain reward tissue. Qiwen Hu, Eun Ji Kim, Gregory R. Grant, Elizabeth A. Heller |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2015 | Benchmark analysis of algorithms for determining and quantifying full-length mRNA splice forms from RNA-seq dataabstractMOTIVATION: Because of the advantages of RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) over microarrays, it is gaining widespread popularity for highly parallel gene expression analysis. For example, RNA-Seq is expected to be able to provide accurate identification and quantification of full-length splice forms. A number of informatics packages have been developed for this purpose, but short reads make it a difficult problem in principle. Sequencing error and polymorphisms add further complications. It has become necessary to perform studies to determine which algorithms perform best and which if any algorithms perform adequately. However, there is a dearth of independent and unbiased benchmarking studies. Here we take an approach using both simulated and experimental benchmark data to evaluate their accuracy. RESULTS: We conclude that most methods are inaccurate even using idealized data, and that no method is highly accurate once multiple splice forms, polymorphisms, intron signal, sequencing errors, alignment errors, annotation errors and other complicating factors are present. These results point to the pressing need for further algorithm development. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Simulated datasets and other supporting information can be found at http://bioinf.itmat.upenn.edu/BEERS/bp2. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Katharina Hayer, Angel D. Pizarro, Nicholas F. Lahens, John B. Hogenesch, Gregory R. Grant |
Bioinform. | 5 |
| 2011 | Comparative analysis of RNA-Seq alignment algorithms and the RNA-Seq unified mapper (RUM)abstractMOTIVATION: A critical task in high-throughput sequencing is aligning millions of short reads to a reference genome. Alignment is especially complicated for RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) because of RNA splicing. A number of RNA-Seq algorithms are available, and claim to align reads with high accuracy and efficiency while detecting splice junctions. RNA-Seq data are discrete in nature; therefore, with reasonable gene models and comparative metrics RNA-Seq data can be simulated to sufficient accuracy to enable meaningful benchmarking of alignment algorithms. The exercise to rigorously compare all viable published RNA-Seq algorithms has not been performed previously. RESULTS: We developed an RNA-Seq simulator that models the main impediments to RNA alignment, including alternative splicing, insertions, deletions, substitutions, sequencing errors and intron signal. We used this simulator to measure the accuracy and robustness of available algorithms at the base and junction levels. Additionally, we used reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and Sanger sequencing to validate the ability of the algorithms to detect novel transcript features such as novel exons and alternative splicing in RNA-Seq data from mouse retina. A pipeline based on BLAT was developed to explore the performance of established tools for this problem, and to compare it to the recently developed methods. This pipeline, the RNA-Seq Unified Mapper (RUM), performs comparably to the best current aligners and provides an advantageous combination of accuracy, speed and usability. AVAILABILITY: The RUM pipeline is distributed via the Amazon Cloud and for computing clusters using the Sun Grid Engine (http://cbil.upenn.edu/RUM). CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RNA-Seq sequence reads described in the article are deposited at GEO, accession GSE26248. Gregory R. Grant, Michael H. Farkas, Angel D. Pizarro, Nicholas F. Lahens, Jonathan Schug, Brian P. Brunk, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr., John B. Hogenesch, Eric A. Pierce |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2009 | A flexible two-stage procedure for identifying gene sets that are differentially expressedabstractMOTIVATION: Microarray data analysis has expanded from testing individual genes for differential expression to testing gene sets for differential expression. The tests at the gene set level may focus on multivariate expression changes or on the differential expression of at least one gene in the gene set. These tests may be powerful at detecting subtle changes in expression, but findings at the gene set level need to be examined further to understand whether they are informative and if so how. RESULTS: We propose to first test for differential expression at the gene set level but then proceed to test for differential expression of individual genes within discovered gene sets. We introduce the overall false discovery rate (OFDR) as an appropriate error rate to control when testing multiple gene sets and genes. We illustrate the advantage of this procedure over procedures that only test gene sets or individual genes. Ruth Heller, Elisabetta Manduchi, Gregory R. Grant, Warren J. Ewens |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2005 | A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray dataabstractSUMMARY: Searching for differentially expressed genes is one of the most common applications for microarrays, yet statistically there are difficult hurdles to achieving adequate rigor and practicality. False discovery rate (FDR) approaches have become relatively standard; however, how to define and control the FDR has been hotly debated. Permutation estimation approaches such as SAM and PaGE can be effective; however, they leave much room for improvement. We pursue the permutation estimation method and describe a convenient definition for the FDR that can be estimated in a straightforward manner. We then discuss issues regarding the choice of statistic and data transformation. It is impossible to optimize the power of any statistic for thousands of genes simultaneously, and we look at the practical consequences of this. For example, the log transform can both help and hurt at the same time, depending on the gene. We examine issues surrounding the SAM 'fudge factor' parameter, and how to handle these issues by optimizing with respect to power. Gregory R. Grant, Junmin Liu, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr. |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2004 | RAD and the RAD Study-Annotator: an approach to collection, organization and exchange of all relevant information for high-throughput gene expression studiesabstractMOTIVATION: Gene expression array technology has become increasingly widespread among researchers who recognize its numerous promises. At the same time, bench biologists and bioinformaticians have come to appreciate increasingly the importance of establishing a collaborative dialog from the onset of a study and of collecting and exchanging detailed information on the many experimental and computational procedures using a structured mechanism. This is crucial for adequate analyses of this kind of data. RESULTS: The RNA Abundance Database (RAD; http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/RAD) provides a comprehensive MIAME-supportive infrastructure for gene expression data management and makes extensive use of ontologies. Specific details on protocols, biomaterials, study designs, etc. are collected through a user-friendly suite of web annotation forms. Software has been developed to generate MAGE-ML documents to enable easy export of studies stored in RAD to any other database accepting data in this format (e.g. ArrayExpress). RAD is part of a more general Genomics Unified Schema (http://www.gusdb.org), which includes a richly annotated gene index (http://www.allgenes.org), thus providing a platform that integrates genomic and transcriptomic data from multiple organisms. This infrastructure enables a large variety of queries that incorporate visualization and analysis tools and have been tailored to serve the specific needs of projects focusing on particular organisms or biological systems. Elisabetta Manduchi, Gregory R. Grant, Junmin Liu, Matthew D. Mailman, Angel D. Pizarro, Patricia L. Whetzel, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr. |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2000 | Generation of patterns from gene expression data by assigning confidence to differentially expressed genesabstractMOTIVATION: A protocol is described to attach expression patterns to genes represented in a collection of hybridization array experiments. Discrete values are used to provide an easily interpretable description of differential expression. Binning cutoffs for each sample type are chosen automatically, depending on the desired false-positive rate for the predictions of differential expression. Confidence levels are derived for the statement that changes in observed levels represent true changes in expression. We have a novel method for calculating this confidence, which gives better results than the standard methods. Our method reflects the broader change of focus in the field from studying a few genes with many replicates to studying many (possibly thousands) of genes simultaneously, but with relatively few replicates. Our approach differs from standard methods in that it exploits the fact that there are many genes on the arrays. These are used to estimate for each sample type an appropriate distribution that is employed to control the false-positive rate of the predictions made. Satisfactory results can be obtained using this method with as few as two replicates. RESULTS: The method is illustrated through applications to macroarray and microarray datasets. The first is an erythroid development dataset that we have generated using nylon filter arrays. Clones for genes whose expression is known in these cells were assigned expression patterns which are in accordance with what was expected and which are not picked up by the standards methods. Moreover, genes differentially expressed between normal and leukemic cells were identified. These included genes whose expression was altered upon induction of the leukemic cells to differentiate. The second application is to the microarray data by Alizadeh et al. (2000). Our results are in accordance with their major findings and offer confidence measures for the predictions made. They also provide new insights for further analysis. Elisabetta Manduchi, Gregory R. Grant, Steven E. McKenzie, G. Christian Overton, Saul Surrey, Christian J. Stoeckert Jr. |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 1999 | Significance testing for genomic mismatch scanningabstractArticle Significance testing for genomic mismatch scanning Share on Authors: G. R. Grant Center for Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioinformatics, University of PennsylvaniaView Profile , R. S. Spielman Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania Department of Genetics, University of PennsylvaniaView Profile , E. Manduchi Center for Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioinformatics, University of PennsylvaniaView Profile , V. G. Cheung Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaView Profile , W. J. Ewens Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania Department of Biology, University of PennsylvaniaView Profile Authors Info & Claims RECOMB '99: Proceedings of the third annual international conference on Computational molecular biologyApril 1999 Pages 182–187https://doi.org/10.1145/299432.299482Published:01 April 1999 0citation182DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations0Total Downloads182Last 12 Months0Last 6 weeks0 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my AlertsNew Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteGet Access Gregory R. Grant, R. S. Spielman, Elisabetta Manduchi, Vivian G. Cheung, Warren J. Ewens |
RECOMB | 1 |