Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Joseph Reisinger

dblp:43/1726 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
12as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 11 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 47% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 28% Reinforcement learning · 17%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 82% Web and social media mining · 18%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics
0.222011
Cross-Cutting Models of Lexical Semantics · EMNLP 2011
A Mixture Model with Sharing for Lexical Semantics · EMNLP 2010
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.122010
Latent Variable Models of Concept-Attribute Attachment · ACL/IJCNLP 2009
Spherical Topic Models · ICML 2010
Information retrieval
query understanding
0.112011
Fine-Grained Class Label Markup of Search Queries · ACL 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model
0.112010
A Mixture Model with Sharing for Lexical Semantics · EMNLP 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
topic model
0.112010
Spherical Topic Models · ICML 2010
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › bootstrapping
bootstrapping for information extraction
0.112009
Bootstrapped extraction of class attributes · WWW 2009
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bayesian reinforcement learning
0.112008
Online kernel selection for Bayesian reinforcement learning · ICML 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.112008
Online kernel selection for Bayesian reinforcement learning · ICML 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › temporal difference learning
gaussian process temporal difference learning
0.112008
Online kernel selection for Bayesian reinforcement learning · ICML 2008
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel selection
0.112008
Online kernel selection for Bayesian reinforcement learning · ICML 2008
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation
0.012008
Online kernel selection for Bayesian reinforcement learning · ICML 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bootstrapping · 0.2fine-grained class labeling · 0.1cross-cutting models · 0.1mixture model · 0.1directional statistics · 0.1latent variable model · 0.1tile-coding · 0.1sequential monte carlo · 0.1kernel methods · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Fine-Grained Class Label Markup of Search Queries
Joseph Reisinger, Marius Pasca
ACL1
2011 Cross-Cutting Models of Lexical Semantics
Joseph Reisinger, Raymond J. Mooney
EMNLP1
2010 A Mixture Model with Sharing for Lexical Semantics
Joseph Reisinger, Raymond J. Mooney
EMNLP1
2010 Spherical Topic Models
Joseph Reisinger, Austin Waters, Bryan Silverthorn, Raymond J. Mooney
ICML1
2010 Multi-Prototype Vector-Space Models of Word Meaning
Joseph Reisinger, Raymond J. Mooney
HLT-NAACL1
2009 Latent Variable Models of Concept-Attribute Attachment
Joseph Reisinger, Marius Pasca
ACL/IJCNLP1
2009 Low-Cost Supervision for Multiple-Source Attribute Extraction
Joseph Reisinger, Marius Pasca
CICLing1
2009 Bootstrapped extraction of class attributes
abstract
As an alternative to previous studies on extracting class attributes from unstructured text, which consider either Web documents or query logs as the source of textual data, A bootstrapped method extracts class attributes simultaneously from both sources, using a small set of seed attributes. The method improves extraction precision and also improves attribute relevance across 40 test classes.
Joseph Reisinger, Marius Pasca
WWW1
2008 Weakly-Supervised Acquisition of Labeled Class Instances using Graph Random Walks
Partha P. Talukdar, Joseph Reisinger, Marius Pasca, Deepak Ravichandran, Rahul Bhagat, Fernando Pereira 0003
EMNLP2
2008 Online kernel selection for Bayesian reinforcement learning
abstract
Kernel-based Bayesian methods for Reinforcement Learning (RL) such as Gaussian Process Temporal Difference (GPTD) are particularly promising because they rigorously treat uncertainty in the value function and make it easy to specify prior knowledge. However, the choice of prior distribution significantly affects the empirical performance of the learning agent, and little work has been done extending existing methods for prior model selection to the online setting. This paper develops Replacing-Kernel RL, an online model selection method for GPTD using sequential Monte-Carlo methods. Replacing-Kernel RL is compared to standard GPTD and tile-coding on several RL domains, and is shown to yield significantly better asymptotic performance for many different kernel families. Furthermore, the resulting kernels capture an intuitively useful notion of prior state covariance that may nevertheless be difficult to capture manually.
Joseph Reisinger, Peter Stone 0001, Risto Miikkulainen
ICML1
2007 Acquiring evolvability through adaptive representations
abstract
Adaptive representations allow evolution to explore the space of phenotypes by choosing the most suitable set of genotypic parameters. Although such an approach is believed to be efficient on complex problems, few empirical studieshave been conducted in such domains. In this paper, three neural network representations, a direct encoding, a complexifying encoding, and an implicit encoding capable of adapting the genotype-phenotype mapping are compared on Nothello, a complex game playing domain from the AAAI General Game Playing Competition. Implicit encoding makes the search more efficient and uses several times fewer parameters. Random mutation leads to highly structured phenotypic variation that is acquired during the course of evolution rather than built into the representation itself. Thus, adaptive representations learn to become evolvable, and furthermore do so in a way that makes search efficient on difficult coevolutionary problems.
Joseph Reisinger, Risto Miikkulainen
GECCO1
2006 Selecting for evolvable representations
abstract
Evolutionary algorithms tend to produce solutions that are not evolvable: Although current fitness may be high, further search is impeded as the effects of mutation and crossover become increasingly detrimental. In nature, in addition to having high fitness, organisms have evolvable genomes: phenotypic variation resulting from random mutation is structured and robust. Evolvability is important because it allows the population to produce meaningful variation, leading to efficient search. However, because evolvability does not improve immediate fitness, it must be selected for indirectly. One way to establish such a selection pressure is to change the fitness function systematically. Under such conditions, evolvability emerges only if the representation allows manipulating how genotypic variation maps onto phenotypic variation and if such manipulations lead to detectable changes in fitness. This research forms a framework for understanding how fitness function and representation interact to produce evolvability. Ultimately evolvable encodings may lead to evolutionary algorithms that exhibit the structured complexity and robustness found in nature.
Joseph Reisinger, Risto Miikkulainen
GECCO1
2004 Evolving Reusable Neural Modules
Joseph Reisinger, Kenneth O. Stanley, Risto Miikkulainen
GECCO (2)1