VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ankit Anand
dblp:43/2393
· DBLP profile ↗
16ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 4 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
10 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 42% Language models and text generation · 15% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 48% Automated reasoning and model checking · 32% Combinatorics and discrete mathematics · 21% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Compilers and program optimization · 65% Program synthesis and code generation · 35% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 29 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | GRAIL: Graph Edit Distance and Node Alignment using LLM-Generated Code · ICML 2025 Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMs · ICML 2024 |
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory › graph similarity
graph edit distance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GRAIL: Graph Edit Distance and Node Alignment using LLM-Generated Code · ICML 2025 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph theory
graph similarity |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GRAIL: Graph Edit Distance and Node Alignment using LLM-Generated Code · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › statistical relational learning
lifted inference |
0.8 | 3 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer Vision · IJCAI 2017 Contextual Symmetries in Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2016 Lifting Techniques for Sequential Decision Making and Probabilistic Inference (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › model-based planning
alphazero-style search |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Finding Increasingly Large Extremal Graphs with AlphaZero and Tabu Search · IJCAI 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ReMI: A Dataset for Reasoning with Multiple Images · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
model routing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reward shaping |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMs · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
self-verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward learning
vision-language model reward |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMs · ICML 2024 |
Combinatorics and discrete mathematics › extremal combinatorics
extremal graph theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Finding Increasingly Large Extremal Graphs with AlphaZero and Tabu Search · IJCAI 2024 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning About Progress From Experts · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning About Progress From Experts · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › off-policy reinforcement learning › experience replay
hindsight experience replay |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Proving Theorems using Incremental Learning and Hindsight Experience Replay · ICML 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
automated theorem proving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Proving Theorems using Incremental Learning and Hindsight Experience Replay · ICML 2022 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated theorem proving
first-order theorem proving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Proving Theorems using Incremental Learning and Hindsight Experience Replay · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer Vision · IJCAI 2017 Contextual Symmetries in Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
probabilistic inference |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Contextual Symmetries in Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2016 Lifting Techniques for Sequential Decision Making and Probabilistic Inference (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer Vision · IJCAI 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
stereo vision |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer Vision · IJCAI 2017 |
Image and video processing
image segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer Vision · IJCAI 2017 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
interactive segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer Vision · IJCAI 2017 |
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Lifting Techniques for Sequential Decision Making and Probabilistic Inference (Extended Abstract) · IJCAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
symmetry exploitation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Contextual Symmetries in Probabilistic Graphical Models · IJCAI 2016 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
multi-image understanding |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | ReMI: A Dataset for Reasoning with Multiple Images · NeurIPS 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | ASAP-UCT: Abstraction of State-Action Pairs in UCT · IJCAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › function approximation › representation learning for reinforcement learning
state and action abstraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | ASAP-UCT: Abstraction of State-Action Pairs in UCT · IJCAI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 3.5evolutionary algorithm · 1.7automated prompt tuning · 1.7vision-language model · 1.5tabu search · 1.5code generation · 1.5alphazero · 1.5clause scoring · 1.1few-shot self-verification · 0.8benchmarking · 0.8POMDP · 0.8progress estimation · 0.7expert demonstration · 0.7transformer network · 0.6incremental learning · 0.6hindsight experience replay · 0.6lifted inference · 0.3coarse-to-fine inference · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal BehaviorabstractSymbolic models play a key role in cognitive science, expressing computationally precise hypotheses about how the brain implements a cognitive process. Identifying an appropriate model typically requires a great deal of effort and ingenuity on the part of a human scientist.
Here, we adapt FunSearch (Romera-Paredes et al. 2024), a recently developed tool that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) in an evolutionary algorithm, to automatically discover symbolic cognitive models that accurately capture human and animal behavior.
We consider datasets from three species performing a classic reward-learning task that has been the focus of substantial modeling effort, and find that the discovered programs outperform state-of-the-art cognitive models for each.
The discovered programs can readily be interpreted as hypotheses about human and animal cognition, instantiating interpretable symbolic learning and decision-making algorithms. Broadly, these results demonstrate the viability of using LLM-powered program synthesis to propose novel scientific hypotheses regarding mechanisms of human and animal cognition. Pablo Samuel Castro, Nenad Tomasev, Ankit Anand, Navodita Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Kuba Perlin, Siddhant Jain, Kyle Levin, Noémi Élteto, Will Dabney, Alexander Novikov 0001, Glenn C. Turner, Maria K. Eckstein, Nathaniel D. Daw, Kevin J. Miller, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld |
ICML | 3 |
| 2025 | GRAIL: Graph Edit Distance and Node Alignment using LLM-Generated CodeabstractGraph Edit Distance (GED) is a widely used metric for measuring similarity between two graphs. Computing the optimal GED is NP-hard, leading to the development of various neural and non-neural heuristics. While neural methods have achieved improved approximation quality compared to non-neural approaches, they face significant challenges: (1) They require large amounts of ground truth data, which is itself NP-hard to compute. (2) They operate as black boxes, offering limited interpretability. (3) They lack cross-domain generalization, necessitating expensive retraining for each new dataset. We address these limitations with GRAIL, introducing a paradigm shift in this domain. Instead of training a neural model to predict GED, GRAIL employs a novel combination of large language models (LLMs) and automated prompt tuning to generate a *program* that is used to compute GED. This shift from predicting GED to generating programs imparts various advantages, including end-to-end interpretability and an autonomous self-evolutionary learning mechanism without ground-truth supervision. Extensive experiments on seven datasets confirm that GRAIL not only surpasses state-of-the-art GED approximation methods in prediction quality but also achieves robust cross-domain generalization across diverse graph distributions. Samidha Verma, Arushi Goyal, Ananya Mathur, Ankit Anand, Sayan Ranu |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Code as Reward: Empowering Reinforcement Learning with VLMsabstractPre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are able to understand visual concepts, describe and decompose complex tasks into sub-tasks, and provide feedback on task completion. In this paper, we aim to leverage these capabilities to support the training of reinforcement learning (RL) agents. In principle, VLMs are well suited for this purpose, as they can naturally analyze image-based observations and provide feedback (reward) on learning progress. However, inference in VLMs is computationally expensive, so querying them frequently to compute rewards would significantly slowdown the training of an RL agent. To address this challenge, we propose a framework named Code as Reward (VLM-CaR). VLM-CaR produces dense reward functions from VLMs through code generation, thereby significantly reducing the computational burden of querying the VLM directly. We show that the dense rewards generated through our approach are very accurate across a diverse set of discrete and continuous environments, and can be more effective in training RL policies than the original sparse environment rewards. David Venuto, Mohammad Sami Nur Islam, Martin Klissarov, Doina Precup, Sherry Yang 0001, Ankit Anand |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | Finding Increasingly Large Extremal Graphs with AlphaZero and Tabu Search
Abbas Mehrabian, Ankit Anand, Hyunjik Kim, Nicolas Sonnerat, Matej Balog, Gheorghe Comanici, Tudor Berariu, Anian Ruoss, Anna Bulanova, Daniel Toyama, Sam Blackwell, Bernardino Romera-Paredes, Petar Velickovic, Laurent Orseau, Joonkyung Lee, Anurag Murty Naredla, Doina Precup, Zsolt Adam Wagner |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2024 | AutoMix: Automatically Mixing Language ModelsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) are now available from cloud API providers in various sizes and configurations. While this diversity offers a broad spectrum of choices, effectively leveraging the options to optimize computational cost and performance remains challenging. In this work, we present AutoMix, an approach that strategically routes queries to larger LMs, based on the approximate correctness of outputs from a smaller LM. Central to AutoMix are two key technical contributions. First, it has a few-shot self-verification mechanism, which estimates the reliability of its own outputs without requiring extensive training. Second, given that self-verification can be noisy, it employs a POMDP based router that can effectively select an appropriately sized model, based on answer confidence. Experiments across five language models and five challenging datasets show that Automix consistently surpasses strong baselines, reducing computational cost by over 50\% for comparable performance. Pranjal Aggarwal, Aman Madaan, Ankit Anand, Srividya Pranavi Potharaju, Swaroop Mishra, Aditya Gupta 0001, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Karthik Kappaganthu, Yiming Yang 0002, Shyam Upadhyay, Manaal Faruqui, Mausam |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | ReMI: A Dataset for Reasoning with Multiple ImagesabstractWith the continuous advancement of large language models (LLMs), it is essential to create new benchmarks to evaluate their expanding capabilities and identify areas for improvement. This work focuses on multi-image reasoning, an emerging capability in state-of-the-art LLMs. We introduce ReMI, a dataset designed to assess LLMs' ability to reason with multiple images. This dataset encompasses a diverse range of tasks, spanning various reasoning domains such as math, physics, logic, code, table/chart understanding, and spatial and temporal reasoning. It also covers a broad spectrum of characteristics found in multi-image reasoning scenarios. We have benchmarked several cutting-edge LLMs using ReMI and found a substantial gap between their performance and human-level proficiency. This highlights the challenges in multi-image reasoning and the need for further research. Our analysis also reveals the strengths and weaknesses of different models, shedding light on the types of reasoning that are currently attainable and areas where future models require improvement. We anticipate that ReMI will be a valuable resource for developing and evaluating more sophisticated LLMs capable of handling real-world multi-image understanding tasks. Mehran Kazemi, Nishanth Dikkala, Ankit Anand, Petar Devic, Ishita Dasgupta 0001, Bahare Fatemi, Pranjal Awasthi, Sreenivas Gollapudi, Dee Guo, Ahmed Qureshi |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Learning About Progress From Experts
Jake Bruce, Ankit Anand, Bogdan Mazoure, Rob Fergus |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2022 | Proving Theorems using Incremental Learning and Hindsight Experience ReplayabstractTraditional automated theorem proving systems for first-order logic depend on speed-optimized search and many handcrafted heuristics designed to work over a wide range of domains. Machine learning approaches in the literature either depend on these traditional provers to bootstrap themselves, by leveraging these heuristics, or can struggle due to limited existing proof data. The latter issue can be explained by the lack of a smooth difficulty gradient in theorem proving datasets; large gaps in difficulty between different theorems can make training harder or even impossible. In this paper, we adapt the idea of hindsight experience replay from reinforcement learning to the automated theorem proving domain, so as to use the intermediate data generated during unsuccessful proof attempts. We build a first-order logic prover by disabling all the smart clause-scoring heuristics of the state-of-the-art E prover and replacing them with a clause-scoring neural network learned by using hindsight experience replay in an incremental learning setting. Clauses are represented as graphs and presented to transformer networks with spectral features. We show that provers trained in this way can outperform previous machine learning approaches and compete with the state of the art heuristic-based theorem prover E in its best configuration, on the popular benchmarks MPTP2078, M2k and Mizar40. The proofs generated by our algorithm are also almost always significantly shorter than E’s proofs. Eser Aygün, Ankit Anand, Laurent Orseau, Xavier Glorot, Stephen McAleer, Vlad Firoiu, Lei M. Zhang, Doina Precup, Shibl Mourad |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | AccentDB: A Database of Non-Native English Accents to Assist Neural Speech RecognitionabstractModern Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology has evolved to identify the speech spoken by native speakers of a language very well. However, identification of the speech spoken by non-native speakers continues to be a major challenge for it. In this work, we first spell out the key requirements for creating a well-curated database of speech samples in non-native accents for training and testing robust ASR systems. We then introduce AccentDB, one such database that contains samples of 4 Indian-English accents collected by us, and a compilation of samples from 4 native-English, and a metropolitan Indian-English accent. We also present an analysis on separability of the collected accent data. Further, we present several accent classification models and evaluate them thoroughly against human-labelled accent classes. We test the generalization of our classifier models in a variety of setups of seen and unseen data. Finally, we introduce accent neutralization of non-native accents to native accents using autoencoder models with task-specific architectures. Thus, our work aims to aid ASR systems at every stage of development with a database for training, classification models for feature augmentation, and neutralization systems for acoustic transformations of non-native accents of English. Afroz Ahamad, Ankit Anand, Pranesh Bhargava |
LREC | 2 |
| 2018 | Block-Value Symmetries in Probabilistic Graphical Models
Gagan Madan, Ankit Anand, Mausam, Parag Singla |
UAI | 2 |
| 2017 | Non-Count Symmetries in Boolean & Multi-Valued Prob. Graphical ModelsabstractLifted inference algorithms commonly exploit symmetries in a probabilistic graphical model (PGM) for efficient inference. However, existing algorithms for Boolean-valued domains can identify only those pairs of states as symmetric, in which the number of ones and zeros match exactly (count symmetries). Moreover, algorithms for lifted inference in multi-valued domains also compute a multi-valued extension of count symmetries only. These algorithms miss many symmetries in a domain. In this paper, we present first algorithms to compute non-count symmetries in both Boolean-valued and multi-valued domains. Our methods can also find symmetries between multi-valued variables that have different domain cardinalities. The key insight in the algorithms is that they change the unit of symmetry computation from a variable to a variable-value (VV) pair. Our experiments find that exploiting these symmetries in MCMC can obtain substantial computational gains over existing algorithms. Ankit Anand, Ritesh Noothigattu, Parag Singla, Mausam |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2017 | Coarse-to-Fine Lifted MAP Inference in Computer VisionabstractThere is a vast body of theoretical research on lifted inference in probabilistic graphical models (PGMs). However, few demonstrations exist where lifting is applied in conjunction with top of the line applied algorithms. We pursue the applicability of lifted inference for computer vision (CV), with the insight that a globally optimal (MAP) labeling will likely have the same label for two symmetric pixels. The success of our approach lies in efficiently handling a distinct unary potential on every node (pixel), typical of CV applications. This allows us to lift the large class of algorithms that model a CV problem via PGM inference. We propose a generic template for coarse-to-fine (C2F) inference in CV, which progressively refines an initial coarsely lifted PGM for varying quality-time trade-offs. We demonstrate the performance of C2F inference by developing lifted versions of two near state-of-the-art CV algorithms for stereo vision and interactive image segmentation. We find that, against flat algorithms, the lifted versions have a much superior anytime performance, without any loss in final solution quality. Haroun Habeeb, Ankit Anand, Mausam, Parag Singla |
IJCAI | 2 |
| 2016 | Lifting Techniques for Sequential Decision Making and Probabilistic Inference (Extended Abstract)
Ankit Anand |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Contextual Symmetries in Probabilistic Graphical Models
Ankit Anand, Aditya Grover, Mausam, Parag Singla |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | ASAP-UCT: Abstraction of State-Action Pairs in UCT
Ankit Anand, Aditya Grover, Mausam, Parag Singla |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2013 | Virtual Machine Placement Optimization Supporting Performance SLAsabstractCloud computing model separates usage from ownership in terms of control on resource provisioning. Resources in the cloud are projected as a service and are realized using various service models like IaaS, PaaS and SaaS. In IaaS model, end users get to use a VM whose capacity they can specify but not the placement on a specific host or with which other VMs it can be co-hosted. Typically, the placement decisions happen based on the goals like minimizing the number of physical hosts to support a given set of VMs by satisfying each VMs capacity requirement. However, the role of the VMM usage to support I/O specific workloads inside a VM can make this capacity requirement incomplete. I/O workloads inside VMs require substantial VMM CPU cycles to support their performance. As a result, placement algorithms need to include the VMM's usage on a per VM basis. Secondly, cloud centers encounter situations wherein change in existing VM's capacity or launching of new VMs need to be considered during different placement intervals. Usually, this change is handled by migrating existing VMs to meet the goal of optimal placement. We argue that VM migration is not a trivial task and does include loss of performance during migration. We quantify this migration overhead based on the VM's workload type and include the same in placement problem. One of the goals of the placement algorithm is to reduce the VM's migration prospects, thereby reducing chances of performance loss during migration. This paper evaluates the existing ILP and First Fit Decreasing (FFD) algorithms to consider these constraints to arrive at placement decisions. We observe that ILP algorithm yields optimal results but needs long computing time even with parallel version. However, FFD heuristics are much faster and scalable algorithms that generate a sub-optimal solution, as compared to ILP, but in time-scales that are useful in real-time decision making. We also observe that including VM migration overheads in the placement algorithm results in a marginal increase in the number of physical hosts but a significant, of about 84 percent reduction in VM migration. Ankit Anand, J. Lakshmi, S. K. Nandy 0001 |
CloudCom (1) | 1 |