VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shixiang Liu
dblp:43/2934
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-9064-8868ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 84% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 65% Information theory · 35% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
high-dimensional statistics |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Minimax-Optimal Univariate Function Selection in Sparse Additive Models: Rates, Adaptation, and the Estimation-Selection Gap · NeurIPS 2025 A minimax optimal approach to high-dimensional double sparse linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 A minimax optimal approach to high-dimensional double sparse linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Minimax-Optimal Univariate Function Selection in Sparse Additive Models: Rates, Adaptation, and the Estimation-Selection Gap · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
sparse additive model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Minimax-Optimal Univariate Function Selection in Sparse Additive Models: Rates, Adaptation, and the Estimation-Selection Gap · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
variable selection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Minimax-Optimal Univariate Function Selection in Sparse Additive Models: Rates, Adaptation, and the Estimation-Selection Gap · NeurIPS 2025 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing › sparse recovery
hard thresholding pursuit |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical learning theory
high-dimensional regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › high-dimensional regression
sparse regression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A minimax optimal approach to high-dimensional double sparse linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
iterative hard thresholding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A minimax optimal approach to high-dimensional double sparse linear regression · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › excess risk bounds
oracle inequality |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimax analysis · 3.3iterative thresholding · 1.7adaptive tuning · 1.7iterative hard thresholding · 1.5support recovery · 0.9adaptive estimation · 0.9FDR control · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Minimax-Optimal Univariate Function Selection in Sparse Additive Models: Rates, Adaptation, and the Estimation-Selection GapabstractThe sparse additive model (SpAM) offers a trade-off between interpretability and flexibility, and hence is a powerful model for high-dimensional research.
This paper focuses on the variable selection, i.e., the univariate function selection problem in SpAM.
We establish the minimax separation rates from both the perspectives of sparse multiple testing (FDR + FNR control) and support recovery (wrong recovery probability control).
We further study how adaptation to unknown smoothness affects the minimax separation rate, and propose an adaptive selection procedure.
Finally, we discuss the difference between estimation and selection in SpAM: Procedures achieving optimal function estimation may fail to achieve optimal univariate function selection. Shixiang Liu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Rethinking Hard Thresholding Pursuit: Full Adaptation and Sharp EstimationabstractHard Thresholding Pursuit (HTP) has aroused increasing attention for its robust theoretical guarantees and impressive numerical performance in non-convex optimization. This paper consider a high-dimensional linear regression model withnobservations,ppredictors, and an unknowns∗-sparse signal β∗∈ Rpcorrupted by noise of magnitude σ.We introduce a novel tuning-free procedure, namely Full-Adaptive HTP (FAHTP), that simultaneously adapts to both the unknown sparsity and signal strength of the underlying model. Our theoretical analysis rigorously characterizes the iterative thresholding dynamics of FAHTP, offering refined theoretical insights. In specific, under the beta-min condition min{i:β∗i̸=0}|β∗i| ≥ Cσ(logp/n)1/2, FAHTP achieves oracle estimation rate σ(s∗/n)1/2, highlighting its theoretical superiority over convex competitors such as LASSO and SLOPE, and recovers the true support set exactly. More importantly, even without the beta-min condition, FAHTP achieves a tighter error bound than the classical minimax rate with high probability. The comprehensive numerical experiments substantiate our theoretical findings, underscoring the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed FAHTP. Yanhang Zhang, Shixiang Liu, Zhifan Li, Jianxin Yin 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2024 | A minimax optimal approach to high-dimensional double sparse linear regressionabstractIn this paper, we focus our attention on the high-dimensional double sparse linear regression, that is, a combination of element-wise and group-wise sparsity. To address this problem, we propose an IHT-style (iterative hard thresholding) procedure that dynamically updates the threshold at each step. We establish the matching upper and lower bounds for parameter estimation, showing the optimality of our proposal in the minimax sense. More importantly, we introduce a fully adaptive optimal procedure designed to address unknown sparsity and noise levels. Our adaptive procedure demonstrates optimal statistical accuracy with fast convergence. Additionally, we elucidate the significance of the element-wise sparsity level $s_0$ as the trade-off between IHT and group IHT, underscoring the superior performance of our method over both. Leveraging the beta-min condition, we establish that our IHT-style procedure can attain the oracle estimation rate and achieve almost full recovery of the true support set at both the element level and group level. Finally, we demonstrate the superiority of our method by comparing it with several state-of-the-art algorithms on both synthetic and real-world datasets. Yanhang Zhang, Zhifan Li, Shixiang Liu, Jianxin Yin 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |