Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Junyi Luan
dblp:43/3473
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 91% Web and social media mining · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009 |
Recommender systems › social recommendation
community recommendation |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009 |
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering
matrix factorization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009 |
Web and social media mining › community analysis
social network community analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behavior · WWW 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallel LDA · 0.1latent dirichlet allocation · 0.1association rule mining · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Collaborative filtering for orkut communities: discovery of user latent behaviorabstractUsers of social networking services can connect with each other by forming communities for online interaction. Yet as the number of communities hosted by such websites grows over time, users have even greater need for effective community recommendations in order to meet more users. In this paper, we investigate two algorithms from very different domains and evaluate their effectiveness for personalized community recommendation. First is association rule mining (ARM), which discovers associations between sets of communities that are shared across many users. Second is latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), which models user-community co-occurrences using latent aspects. In comparing LDA with ARM, we are interested in discovering whether modeling low-rank latent structure is more effective for recommendations than directly mining rules from the observed data. We experiment on an Orkut data set consisting of 492,104 users and 118,002 communities. Our empirical comparisons using the top-k recommendations metric show that LDA performs consistently better than ARM for the community recommendation task when recommending a list of 4 or more communities. However, for recommendation lists of up to 3 communities, ARM is still a bit better. We analyze examples of the latent information learned by LDA to explain this finding. To efficiently handle the large-scale data set, we parallelize LDA on distributed computers and demonstrate our parallel implementation's scalability with varying numbers of machines. Wen-Yen Chen, Jon-Chyuan Chu, Junyi Luan, Hongjie Bai, Edward Y. Chang |
WWW | 3 |