VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam M. Johansen
dblp:43/3875
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-3531-7628ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 71% Optimization for machine learning · 16% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Generalised Bayesian Filtering via Sequential Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
1.1 | 2 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 Generalised Bayesian Filtering via Sequential Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024 Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024 Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient descent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › estimation error bounds
non-asymptotic error bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Algorithms and data structures › markov chains › mixing time
log-sobolev inequality |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalities · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
particle-based variational inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › sequential monte carlo
particle method |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Momentum Particle Maximum Likelihood · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
semi-implicit variational inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Particle Semi-Implicit Variational Inference · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer Fusion · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polyak-łojasiewicz inequality · 1.7gradient flow · 1.7bakry-émery theory · 1.7sequential monte carlo · 1.3divide-and-conquer · 1.3wasserstein gradient flow · 0.8optimal transport · 0.8nesterov accelerated gradient · 0.8markov chain monte carlo · 0.8langevin diffusion · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Error bounds for particle gradient descent, and extensions of the log-Sobolev and Talagrand inequalitiesabstractWe derive non-asymptotic error bounds for particle gradient descent (PGD, Kuntz et al. (2023)), a recently introduced algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of large latent variable models obtained by discretizing a gradient flow of the free energy. We begin by showing that the flow converges exponentially fast to the free energy's minimizers for models satisfying a condition that generalizes both the log-Sobolev and the Polyak--Łojasiewicz inequalities (LSI and PŁI, respectively). We achieve this by extending a result well-known in the optimal transport literature (that the LSI implies the Talagrand inequality) and its counterpart in the optimization literature (that the PŁI implies the so-called quadratic growth condition), and applying the extension to our new setting. We also generalize the Bakry--Émery Theorem and show that the LSI/PŁI extension holds for models with strongly concave log-likelihoods. For such models, we further control PGD's discretization error and obtain the non-asymptotic error bounds. While we are motivated by the study of PGD, we believe that the inequalities and results we extend may be of independent interest. Rocco Caprio, Juan Kuntz, Samuel Power, Adam M. Johansen |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 4 |
| 2024 | Momentum Particle Maximum LikelihoodabstractMaximum likelihood estimation (MLE) of latent variable models is often recast as the minimization of a free energy functional over an extended space of parameters and probability distributions. This perspective was recently combined with insights from optimal transport to obtain novel particle-based algorithms for fitting latent variable models to data. Drawing inspiration from prior works which interpret ‘momentum-enriched’ optimization algorithms as discretizations of ordinary differential equations, we propose an analogous dynamical-systems-inspired approach to minimizing the free energy functional. The result is a dynamical system that blends elements of Nesterov’s Accelerated Gradient method, the underdamped Langevin diffusion, and particle methods. Under suitable assumptions, we prove that the continuous-time system minimizes the functional. By discretizing the system, we obtain a practical algorithm for MLE in latent variable models. The algorithm outperforms existing particle methods in numerical experiments and compares favourably with other MLE algorithms. Jen Ning Lim, Juan Kuntz, Samuel Power, Adam M. Johansen |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Particle Semi-Implicit Variational InferenceabstractSemi-implicit variational inference (SIVI) enriches the expressiveness of variational
families by utilizing a kernel and a mixing distribution to hierarchically define the
variational distribution. Existing SIVI methods parameterize the mixing distribution
using implicit distributions, leading to intractable variational densities. As a result,
directly maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO) is not possible, so they
resort to one of the following: optimizing bounds on the ELBO, employing costly
inner-loop Markov chain Monte Carlo runs, or solving minimax objectives. In this
paper, we propose a novel method for SIVI called Particle Variational Inference
(PVI) which employs empirical measures to approximate the optimal mixing
distributions characterized as the minimizer of a free energy functional. PVI arises
naturally as a particle approximation of a Euclidean–Wasserstein gradient flow and,
unlike prior works, it directly optimizes the ELBO whilst making no parametric
assumption about the mixing distribution. Our empirical results demonstrate that
PVI performs favourably compared to other SIVI methods across various tasks.
Moreover, we provide a theoretical analysis of the behaviour of the gradient flow
of a related free energy functional: establishing the existence and uniqueness of
solutions as well as propagation of chaos results. Jen Ning Lim, Adam M. Johansen |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2023 | Particle algorithms for maximum likelihood training of latent variable modelsabstractNeal and Hinton (1998) recast maximum likelihood estimation of any given latent variable model as the minimization of a free energy functional F, and the EM algorithm as coordinate descent applied to F. Here, we explore alternative ways to optimize the functional. In particular, we identify various gradient flows associated with F and show that their limits coincide with F’s stationary points. By discretizing the flows, we obtain practical particle-based algorithms for maximum likelihood estimation in broad classes of latent variable models. The novel algorithms scale to high-dimensional settings and perform well in numerical experiments. Juan Kuntz, Jen Ning Lim, Adam M. Johansen |
AISTATS | 3 |
| 2023 | Divide-and-Conquer FusionabstractCombining several (sample approximations of) distributions, which we term sub-posteriors, into a single distribution proportional to their product, is a common challenge. Occurring, for instance, in distributed 'big data' problems, or when working under multi-party privacy constraints. Many existing approaches resort to approximating the individual sub-posteriors for practical necessity, then find either an analytical approximation or sample approximation of the resulting (product-pooled) posterior. The quality of the posterior approximation for these approaches is poor when the sub-posteriors fall out-with a narrow range of distributional form, such as being approximately Gaussian. Recently, a Fusion approach has been proposed which finds an exact Monte Carlo approximation of the posterior, circumventing the drawbacks of approximate approaches. Unfortunately, existing Fusion approaches have a number of computational limitations, particularly when unifying a large number of sub-posteriors. In this paper, we generalise the theory underpinning existing Fusion approaches, and embed the resulting methodology within a recursive divide-and-conquer sequential Monte Carlo paradigm. This ultimately leads to a competitive Fusion approach, which is robust to increasing numbers of sub-posteriors. Ryan S. Y. Chan, Murray Pollock, Adam M. Johansen, Gareth O. Roberts |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2021 | A spatio-temporal model to reveal oscillator phenotypes in molecular clocks: Parameter estimation elucidates circadian gene transcription dynamics in single-cellsabstractWe propose a stochastic distributed delay model together with a Markov random field prior and a measurement model for bioluminescence-reporting to analyse spatio-temporal gene expression in intact networks of cells. The model describes the oscillating time evolution of molecular mRNA counts through a negative transcriptional-translational feedback loop encoded in a chemical Langevin equation with a probabilistic delay distribution. The model is extended spatially by means of a multiplicative random effects model with a first order Markov random field prior distribution. Our methodology effectively separates intrinsic molecular noise, measurement noise, and extrinsic noise and phenotypic variation driving cell heterogeneity, while being amenable to parameter identification and inference. Based on the single-cell model we propose a novel computational stability analysis that allows us to infer two key characteristics, namely the robustness of the oscillations, i.e. whether the reaction network exhibits sustained or damped oscillations, and the profile of the regulation, i.e. whether the inhibition occurs over time in a more distributed versus a more direct manner, which affects the cells' ability to phase-shift to new schedules. We show how insight into the spatio-temporal characteristics of the circadian feedback loop in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) can be gained by applying the methodology to bioluminescence-reported expression of the circadian core clock gene Cry1 across mouse SCN tissue. We find that while (almost) all SCN neurons exhibit robust cell-autonomous oscillations, the parameters that are associated with the regulatory transcription profile give rise to a spatial division of the tissue between the central region whose oscillations are resilient to perturbation in the sense that they maintain a high degree of synchronicity, and the dorsal region which appears to phase shift in a more diversified way as a response to large perturbations and thus could be more amenable to entrainment. Måns Unosson, Marco Brancaccio, Michael Hastings, Adam M. Johansen, Bärbel Finkenstädt |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 4 |
| 2020 | Generalised Bayesian Filtering via Sequential Monte CarloabstractWe introduce a framework for inference in general state-space hidden Markov models (HMMs) under likelihood misspecification. In particular, we leverage the loss-theoretic perspective of Generalized Bayesian Inference (GBI) to define generalised filtering recursions in HMMs, that can tackle the problem of inference under model misspecification. In doing so, we arrive at principled procedures for robust inference against observation contamination by utilising the $\beta$-divergence. Operationalising the proposed framework is made possible via sequential Monte Carlo methods (SMC), where the standard particle methods, and their associated convergence results, are readily adapted to the new setting. We demonstrate our approach to object tracking and Gaussian process regression problems, and observe improved performance over standard filtering algorithms. Ayman Boustati, Ömer Deniz Akyildiz, Theodoros Damoulas, Adam M. Johansen |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2006 | Maximum Likelihood Parameter Estimation for Latent Variable Models Using Sequential Monte CarloabstractWe present a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method for maximum likelihood (ML) parameter estimation in latent variable models. Standard methods rely on gradient algorithms such as the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm and its Monte Carlo variants. Our approach is different and motivated by similar considerations to simulated annealing (SA); that is we propose to sample from a sequence of artificial distributions whose support concentrates itself on the set of ML estimates. To achieve this we use SMC methods. We conclude by presenting simulation results on a toy problem and a non-linear non-Gaussian time series model Adam M. Johansen, Arnaud Doucet, Manuel Davy |
ICASSP (3) | 1 |