Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Franklin H. Moss

dblp:43/398 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 4 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Routing and switching · 82% Internet architecture and protocols · 14% Network management and operations · 5%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Routing and switching › routing
distributed routing
0.011982
A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Routing and switching
link failure recovery
0.011982
A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Routing and switching › routing algorithms
loop-free routing
0.011982
A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Routing and switching › routing protocol
routing convergence
0.011982
A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Routing and switching › routing algorithms
shortest path routing
0.011982
A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1982
Internet architecture and protocols › naming and addressing
network addressing
0.011981
An Evaluation of Local Path ID Swapping in Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981
Routing and switching › routing tables › routing table management
routing table reduction
0.011981
An Evaluation of Local Path ID Swapping in Computer Networks · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed algorithm · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 The First Anniversary of the Tivoli/IBM Merger: The Present and Future of TME 10
Franklin H. Moss
Integrated Network Management1
1982 A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks
abstract
A new distributed algorithm is presented for dynamically determining weighted shortest paths used for message routing in computer networks. The major features of the algorithm are that the paths defined do not form transient loops when weights change and the number of steps required to find new shortest paths when network links fail is less than for previous algorithms. Specifically, the worst case recovery time is proportional to the largest number of hopshin any of the weighted shortest paths. For previous loop-free distributed algorithms this recovery time is proportional toh2.
Jeff Jaffe, Franklin H. Moss
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
1981 A Responsive Distributed Routing Algorithm for Computer Networks
Jeff Jaffe, Franklin H. Moss
ICDCS2
1981 Some theoretical results in multiple path definition in networks
abstract
Abstract This paper is concerned with the problem of defining K multiple paths between pairs of nodes in a network. The treatment presented here is on a theoretical level, although the problem is motivated by a practical scheme for message routing in store‐and‐forward packet switched computer networks. Theorems are presented which offer readily testable sufficient conditions on the topology of a network which guarantee the existence of at least one set of paths under consideration. The proof of this theorem provides a generalized systematic method for constructing these paths if the sufficient conditions are met.
Franklin H. Moss, Philip M. Merlin
Networks1
1981 An Evaluation of Local Path ID Swapping in Computer Networks
abstract
This paper analyzes a method for identifying end-to-end connections in computer networks which is designed to provide reductions in the sizes of the packet headers and routing tables stored in the nodes. The method, known as Local Path ID Swapping, uses a shortened connection identifier, called the LPID, in the message headers and routing tables. In general, the LPID field is swapped in the message header from node to node along the path of the route. Some analytical results are presented for evaluating the important tradeoffs involved in LPID swapping. Most notable is the tradeoff between the size of the LPID field and the number of connections which can be defined in the network.
George Markowsky, Franklin H. Moss
IEEE Trans. Commun.2