VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael L. Kalish
dblp:43/4833
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2810-7550ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 5 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Training Methods in Categorization: A Comparison of Classification and Observation on Rule Adoption and Rule Consistency
Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2025 | Classification Versus Observation through Within- and Between-Category Comparison
Rachel Lynn Perri, Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2024 | Towards a Unified Model Describing Multiple Tasks: Extending the Retrieving Effectively from Memory Model to Categorization
Sinem Aytac, Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2024 | Extending the Locally Bayesian Learning Model to Exemplar-Based Categorization with Continuous Features
Sinem Aytac, Cindy G. Mendoza Gonzalez, Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2023 | The Categorization Task is Insufficient to Distinguish between Strategies: A Case for Partial-XOR-like Tasks
Michael L. Kalish |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2015 | A Bayesian Latent Mixture Approach to Modeling Individual Differences in Categorization Using General Recognition Theory
Irina Danileiko, Michael D. Lee 0001, Michael L. Kalish |
CogSci | 3 |
| 2011 | Grounding lexical choice in Bayesian inference
Kyle Albarado, Michael L. Kalish |
CogSci | 2 |
| 2011 | Discovering Inductive Biases in Categorization through Iterated Learning
Kevin Robert Canini, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Wolf Vanpaemel, Michael L. Kalish |
CogSci | 4 |
| 2008 | Modeling human function learning with Gaussian processesabstractAccounts of how people learn functional relationships between continuous variables have tended to focus on two possibilities: that people are estimating explicit functions, or that they are simply performing associative learning supported by similarity. We provide a rational analysis of function learning, drawing on work on regression in machine learning and statistics. Using the equivalence of Bayesian linear regression and Gaussian processes, we show that learning explicit rules and using similarity can be seen as two views of one solution to this problem. We use this insight to define a Gaussian process model of human function learning that combines the strengths of both approaches. Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Christopher G. Lucas, Joseph Jay Williams, Michael L. Kalish |
NIPS | 4 |