Michael L. Kalish

dblp:43/4833 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2810-7550ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 5 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 8 · 5 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Training Methods in Categorization: A Comparison of Classification and Observation on Rule Adoption and Rule Consistency
Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral
CogSci2
2025 Classification Versus Observation through Within- and Between-Category Comparison
Rachel Lynn Perri, Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral
CogSci2
2024 Towards a Unified Model Describing Multiple Tasks: Extending the Retrieving Effectively from Memory Model to Categorization
Sinem Aytac, Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral
CogSci3
2024 Extending the Locally Bayesian Learning Model to Exemplar-Based Categorization with Continuous Features
Sinem Aytac, Cindy G. Mendoza Gonzalez, Michael L. Kalish, Daniel Corral
CogSci4
2023 The Categorization Task is Insufficient to Distinguish between Strategies: A Case for Partial-XOR-like Tasks
Michael L. Kalish
CogSci2
2015 A Bayesian Latent Mixture Approach to Modeling Individual Differences in Categorization Using General Recognition Theory
Irina Danileiko, Michael D. Lee 0001, Michael L. Kalish
CogSci3
2011 Grounding lexical choice in Bayesian inference
Kyle Albarado, Michael L. Kalish
CogSci2
2011 Discovering Inductive Biases in Categorization through Iterated Learning
Kevin Robert Canini, Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Wolf Vanpaemel, Michael L. Kalish
CogSci4
2008 Modeling human function learning with Gaussian processes
abstract
Accounts of how people learn functional relationships between continuous variables have tended to focus on two possibilities: that people are estimating explicit functions, or that they are simply performing associative learning supported by similarity. We provide a rational analysis of function learning, drawing on work on regression in machine learning and statistics. Using the equivalence of Bayesian linear regression and Gaussian processes, we show that learning explicit rules and using similarity can be seen as two views of one solution to this problem. We use this insight to define a Gaussian process model of human function learning that combines the strengths of both approaches.
Thomas L. Griffiths 0001, Christopher G. Lucas, Joseph Jay Williams, Michael L. Kalish
NIPS4