Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ben Plosk

dblp:430/6477 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-3497-7450ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed computing theory
contention resolution
1.012026
Contention Resolution, with and without a Global Clock · STOC 2026
Distributed systems
clock synchronization
0.312026
Contention Resolution, with and without a Global Clock · STOC 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

distributed algorithm · 2.0contention resolution protocols · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Contention Resolution, with and without a Global Clock
abstract
In the Contention Resolution problem n parties each wish to have exclusive use of a shared resource for one unit of time. A canonical example is n devices that each must broadcast a packet of information on a shared channel, but the same principles apply to other distributed systems. The problem has been studied since the early 1970s, under a variety of assumptions on feedback (collision detection, etc.) given to the parties, how the parties wake up (synchronized, adversarial, random), knowledge of n, and so on. The most consistent assumption is that parties do not have access to a global clock, only their local time since wake-up. This is surprising because the assumption of a global clock is both technologically realistic and algorithmically interesting. It enriches the problem, and opens the door to entirely new techniques.
Zixi Cai, Kuowen Chen, Shengquan Du, Tsvi Kopelowitz, Seth Pettie, Ben Plosk
STOC6