Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lukas André Feldgrill

dblp:430/7429 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › inconsistency handling
conflict detection
1.012026
Robust Lazy Conflict Detection via Multi-Conflict Extraction and Genetic Diversity Control · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › expert systems
knowledge-based configuration
1.012026
Robust Lazy Conflict Detection via Multi-Conflict Extraction and Genetic Diversity Control · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-conflict extraction · 1.0genetic algorithm · 1.0diversity control · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Robust Lazy Conflict Detection via Multi-Conflict Extraction and Genetic Diversity Control
abstract
Detecting minimal conflict sets is essential for providing meaningful feedback in knowledge-based configuration. While lazy conflict detection addresses runtime efficiency by predetermining conflict sets offline using a genetic algorithm, it suffers from low conflict coverage, stagnation, and instability. We propose a robust enhancement that integrates multi-conflict extraction and genetic diversity control to overcome these limitations. Our method extends conflict discovery per evaluation and introduces three diversity mechanisms: full population reproduction, weighted genetic operators, and adaptive extinction. Empirical evaluations on five real-world configuration knowledge bases show that our approach recovers up to 85% of conflict sets, reduces solver calls by up to 73%, and achieves higher result stability. These improvements demonstrate the scalability and reliability of enhanced lazy conflict detection for interactive configuration systems.
Viet Man Le, Lukas André Feldgrill, Alexander Felfernig
AAAI2