Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris Ge
dblp:435/0082
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning theory · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private linear regression |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
linear regression |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subsample-test-aggregate · 2.0DP-SGD · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy ReductionabstractWe present a sample- and time-efficient $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private (DP) algorithm for $d$-dimensional linear regression with a sample complexity of \[ n_{\mathrm{STAR}} = \widetilde{O}\left(\frac{d}{\alpha^2} + \frac{d \log(1/\delta)}{\alpha \varepsilon} + \frac{d \log(1/\delta)}{\varepsilon}\right) + o(d). \]{This} improves upon prior polynomial-time algorithms whose sample complexity either depends on the condition number of the design matrix $\kappa$ (for DP-SGD with gradient clipping), scales quadratically with the dimension (for Sum-of-Squares algorithms) or with the inverse of the privacy parameter (for outlier removal algorithms such as insufficient statistics perturbation or ISSP), \[ n_{\mathrm{SoS}} = \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d^2}{\alpha^2}\right), \quad n_{\mathrm{DP\mbox{-}SGD}} = \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d \sqrt{\kappa}}{\varepsilon}\right), \quad n_{\mathrm{ISSP}} = \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d}{\varepsilon^2}\right). \]{Our} algorithm is based on a novel \emph{subsample-test-aggregate} (STA) approach for ensuring privacy given only bounded \emph{down-sensitivity} – robustness to removal, but not addition, of a small number of samples. The intuition that down-sensitivity should be related to privacy is not new, but STA formalizes this by providing an \emph{efficient black-box reduction from down-sensitivity to privacy} which we expect to be applicable beyond the setting of linear regression. Ittai Rubinstein, Chris Ge, Sam Hopkins 0001 |
COLT | 2 |