Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chris Ge

dblp:435/0082 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private linear regression
1.012026
Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.012026
Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › regression
linear regression
0.312026
Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity
0.312026
Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction · COLT 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subsample-test-aggregate · 2.0DP-SGD · 2.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Private Linear Regression via a Down-Sensitivity to Privacy Reduction
abstract
We present a sample- and time-efficient $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differentially private (DP) algorithm for $d$-dimensional linear regression with a sample complexity of \[ n_{\mathrm{STAR}} = \widetilde{O}\left(\frac{d}{\alpha^2} + \frac{d \log(1/\delta)}{\alpha \varepsilon} + \frac{d \log(1/\delta)}{\varepsilon}\right) + o(d). \]{This} improves upon prior polynomial-time algorithms whose sample complexity either depends on the condition number of the design matrix $\kappa$ (for DP-SGD with gradient clipping), scales quadratically with the dimension (for Sum-of-Squares algorithms) or with the inverse of the privacy parameter (for outlier removal algorithms such as insufficient statistics perturbation or ISSP), \[ n_{\mathrm{SoS}} = \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d^2}{\alpha^2}\right), \quad n_{\mathrm{DP\mbox{-}SGD}} = \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d \sqrt{\kappa}}{\varepsilon}\right), \quad n_{\mathrm{ISSP}} = \widetilde{\Omega}\left(\frac{d}{\varepsilon^2}\right). \]{Our} algorithm is based on a novel \emph{subsample-test-aggregate} (STA) approach for ensuring privacy given only bounded \emph{down-sensitivity} – robustness to removal, but not addition, of a small number of samples. The intuition that down-sensitivity should be related to privacy is not new, but STA formalizes this by providing an \emph{efficient black-box reduction from down-sensitivity to privacy} which we expect to be applicable beyond the setting of linear regression.
Ittai Rubinstein, Chris Ge, Sam Hopkins 0001
COLT2