VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Thomas P. Utting
dblp:436/9099 · also Tom Utting
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 50% Information extraction and text analysis · 50% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in Dialogue · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
surprisal minimization · 1.0language model · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Surprisal Minimisation over Goal-directed Alternatives Predicts Production Choice in DialogueabstractWe model utterance production as probabilistic cost-sensitive choice over contextual alternatives, using information-theoretic notions of cost.We distinguish between goal-directed alternatives that realise a fixed communicative intent and goal-agnostic alternatives defined only by contextual plausibility, allowing us to derive speaker-and listener-oriented interpretations of different cost measures.We present a procedure to generate both types of alternative sets using language models.Analysing production choices in open-ended dialogue under both deterministic and probabilistic cost minimisation, we find that surprisal minimisation relative to goal-directed alternatives provides the strongest predictive account under both analyses.By contrast, uniform information density and length-based costs exhibit weaker and less consistent predictive power across conditions.More broadly, our study suggests that alternative-conditioned optimisation with LMgenerated alternatives provides a principled framework for studying speaker and listener pressures in naturalistic language production. 1 Thomas P. Utting, Mario Giulianelli, Arabella Sinclair |
ACL (1) | 1 |