Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rick Beeloo

dblp:437/0817 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-6984-1294ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › pattern matching
approximate string matching
1.012026
Sassy: fuzzy searching DNA sequences using SIMD · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › single-cell data preprocessing
demultiplexing
1.012026
Barbell reveals and resolves demultiplexing and trimming issues in Nanopore data · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metagenomics
1.012026
Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
nanopore sequencing
1.012026
Barbell reveals and resolves demultiplexing and trimming issues in Nanopore data · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
1.012026
Sassy: fuzzy searching DNA sequences using SIMD · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › microbiology
virus-host interaction
1.012026
Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection · Bioinform. 2026
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
sequencing quality control
0.312026
Barbell reveals and resolves demultiplexing and trimming issues in Nanopore data · Bioinform. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence alignment · 1.0seed-chain-extend · 1.0pattern-aware demultiplexing · 1.0bitvector · 1.0benchmarking · 1.0SIMD · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Sassy: fuzzy searching DNA sequences using SIMD
abstract
MOTIVATION: Approximate string matching (ASM) is the problem of finding all occurrences of a pattern in a text while allowing up to k errors. Many modern methods use seed-chain-extend, which is fast in practice, but does not guarantee finding all matches with ≤k errors. However, applications such as CRISPR off-target detection require exhaustive results. RESULTS: We introduce Sassy, a library and tool for ASM of short patterns in long texts. Sassy splits the text into four parts that are searched in parallel, and uses bitvectors in the text direction rather than the pattern direction. This has complexity O(k⌈n/W⌉) when searching a random text of length n, where W=256 is the SIMD width, and provides significant speedups for small k. Separately, we allow matches of the pattern to extend beyond the text for an overhang cost of, e.g. α=0.5 per character, to find matches near contig or read ends.Sassy is 4× to 15× faster than Edlib for patterns ≤1000 bp, and can search text with a throughput near 2 Gbp/s. Likewise, Sassy is over 100× faster than parasail. We apply Sassy to CRISPR off-target detection by searching 61 guide sequences in a human genome. Sassy is 100× faster than SWOffinder and only slightly slower (for k≤3) than CHOPOFF, for which building its index takes 20 min. Sassy also scales well to larger k, unlike CHOPOFF whose index took over 10 h to build for k=5. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Sassy is available as library and binary at https://github.com/RagnarGrootKoerkamp/sassy, and archived at swh:1:dir:e884758dce5777a441bc2799dc8824e563c5f97b.
Rick Beeloo, Ragnar Groot Koerkamp
Bioinform.1
2026 Barbell reveals and resolves demultiplexing and trimming issues in Nanopore data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Oxford Nanopore sequencing enables long-read analysis for diverse applications, but artefacts introduced by Nanopore barcoding are poorly characterized and can compromise demultiplexing accuracy and downstream analyses. RESULTS: Using a rapid barcoding experiment on 66 diagnostic samples, we found that only 83% of reads followed the expected single-barcode configuration, while 17% showed complex barcode attachments. We observed similar patterns in public datasets, and also in native barcoding datasets where only 30%-70% of the reads had barcodes on both ends. Widely used demultiplexers, including Dorado, fail to resolve these cases, leaving ∼10% of our rapid barcoding reads partially trimmed and contaminated with adapter fragments. We developed Barbell, a pattern-aware demultiplexer that is designed to detect complex barcode configurations. Barbell reduced contaminated reads from >400 000 (Dorado/Flexiplex) to 166 (99.96% reduction), minimized barcode bleeding, and supports custom experimental designs such as dual-end barcodes and shorter barcodes (e.g. Illumina barcodes). We further show that such contamination is widespread in public databases, with Nanopore sequences detected in hundreds of NCBI entries, some of which are responsible for artificial taxonomic connections. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Barbell is open source and available at https://github.com/rickbeeloo/barbell.
Rick Beeloo, Ragnar Groot Koerkamp, Xiu Jia, Marian J. Broekhuizen-Stins, Lieke van Ijken, Els M. Broens, Aldert Zomer, Bas E. Dutilh
Bioinform.1
2026 Computational tool choice impacts CRISPR spacer-protospacer detection
abstract
MOTIVATION: CRISPR spacer-protospacer matching is widely used to infer host-virus interactions in microbial and viromics studies, but the choice of sequence search or alignment tool and its reporting behavior is often under-evaluated for this specific task. RESULTS: Using synthetic, semi-synthetic, and real datasets, we benchmarked commonly used tools and observed substantial differences in recall, runtime, and resource usage across distance metrics and thresholds. Our analyses support practical defaults for large-scale spacer-target matching and clarify trade-offs between exhaustive and heuristic approaches. AVAILABILITY: Source code and benchmark workflows are available at https://github.com/UriNeri/spacer_matching_bench. Data and run artifacts are archived on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15171878).
Uri Neri, Antonio Pedro Camargo, Brian Bushnell, Rick Beeloo, Simon Roux
Bioinform.4