Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Haibing Di
dblp:437/3942
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › large language model adaptation › personalization
LLM personalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Calibrated Optimization Framework · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
preference optimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Calibrated Optimization Framework · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
preference calibration · 1.0positive-unlabeled learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Personalizing LLMs with Binary Feedback: A Preference-Calibrated Optimization FrameworkabstractLarge Language Model (LLM) personalization aims to align model behaviors with individual user preferences.Existing methods often focus on isolated user histories, neglecting the essential role of inter-user differences.We propose C-BPO, a framework that personalizes LLMs via preference-calibrated binary signals.By treating target user data as positive feedback and other users' data as an auxiliary set of implicit negative signals, C-BPO captures distinct inter-user differences.To mitigate the preference overlap issue, where shared task knowledge is erroneously penalized, we derive an objective grounded in Positive-Unlabeled (PU) learning theory.This approach purifies negative signals by subtracting "positive bias", ensuring alignment with unique idiosyncrasies without compromising general helpfulness.Empirical experiments across various personalization tasks and backbone LLMs show C-BPO consistently outperforms baselines, demonstrating the efficacy of preference-calibrated binary signals in modeling inter-user differences. Xilai Ma, Liye Zhao, Weijun Yao, Haibing Di |
ACL (1) | 4 |