Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tomás González 0002

dblp:438/0439 · also Tomás González Lara · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
4 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 73% Information theory · 27%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Optimization for machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
2.742025
Private Evolution Converges · NeurIPS 2025
Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2025
Mirror Descent Algorithms with Nearly Dimension-Independent Rates for Differentially-Private Stochastic Saddle-Point Problems extended abstract · COLT 2024
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy auditing
0.912025
Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
synthetic data generation
0.912025
Private Evolution Converges · NeurIPS 2025
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis
0.912025
Private Evolution Converges · NeurIPS 2025
Information theory › hypothesis testing
sequential hypothesis testing
0.912025
Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
private convex optimization
0.812024
Mirror Descent Algorithms with Nearly Dimension-Independent Rates for Differentially-Private Stochastic Saddle-Point Problems extended abstract · COLT 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.812024
Mirror Descent Algorithms with Nearly Dimension-Independent Rates for Differentially-Private Stochastic Saddle-Point Problems extended abstract · COLT 2024
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic convex optimization
differentially private optimization
0.812024
Mirror Descent Algorithms with Nearly Dimension-Independent Rates for Differentially-Private Stochastic Saddle-Point Problems extended abstract · COLT 2024
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
differentially private optimization
0.712023
Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private Optimization · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
finite-sum optimization
0.712023
Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private Optimization · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
stationary point convergence
0.712023
Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private Optimization · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization
0.712023
Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private Optimization · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distance · 1.7sequential test · 1.7private evolution · 1.7anytime-valid inference · 1.7Gaussian variation API · 1.7stochastic mirror descent · 1.5maurey sparsification · 1.5bias-reduced gradient estimators · 1.5acceleration · 1.5convex optimization · 1.3differential privacy · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Sequentially Auditing Differential Privacy
abstract
We propose a practical sequential test for auditing differential privacy guarantees of black-box mechanisms. The test processes streams of mechanisms' outputs providing anytime-valid inference while controlling Type I error, overcoming the fixed sample size limitation of previous batch auditing methods. Experiments show this test detects violations with sample sizes that are orders of magnitude smaller than existing methods, reducing this number from 50K to a few hundred examples, across diverse realistic mechanisms. Notably, it identifies DP-SGD privacy violations in \textit{under} one training run, unlike prior methods needing full model training.
Tomás González 0002, Mateo Dulce-Rubio, Aaditya Ramdas, Mónica Ribero
NeurIPS1
2025 Private Evolution Converges
abstract
Private Evolution (PE) is a promising training-free method for differentially private (DP) synthetic data generation. While it achieves strong performance in some domains (e.g., images and text), its behavior in others (e.g., tabular data) is less consistent. To date, the only theoretical analysis of the convergence of PE depends on unrealistic assumptions about both the algorithm’s behavior and the structure of the sensitive dataset. In this work, we develop a new theoretical framework to understand PE’s practical behavior and identify sufficient conditions for its convergence. For $d$-dimensional sensitive datasets with $n$ data points from a convex and compact domain, we prove that under the right hyperparameter settings and given access to the Gaussian variation API proposed in \cite{PE23}, PE produces an $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP synthetic dataset with expected 1-Wasserstein distance $\tilde{O}(d(n\varepsilon)^{-1/d})$ from the original; this establishes worst-case convergence of the algorithm as $n \to \infty$. Our analysis extends to general Banach spaces as well. We also connect PE to the Private Signed Measure Mechanism, a method for DP synthetic data generation that has thus far not seen much practical adoption. We demonstrate the practical relevance of our theoretical findings in experiments.
Tomás González 0002, Giulia Fanti, Aaditya Ramdas
NeurIPS1
2024 Mirror Descent Algorithms with Nearly Dimension-Independent Rates for Differentially-Private Stochastic Saddle-Point Problems extended abstract
abstract
We study the problem of differentially-private (DP) stochastic (convex-concave) saddle-points in the polyhedral setting. We propose $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-DP algorithms based on stochastic mirror descent that attain nearly dimension-independent convergence rates for the expected duality gap, a type of guarantee that was known before only for bilinear objectives. For convex-concave and first-order-smooth stochastic objectives, our algorithms attain a rate of $\sqrt{\log(d)/n} + (\log(d)^{3/2}/[n\varepsilon])^{1/3}$, where $d$ is the dimension of the problem and $n$ the dataset size. Under an additional second-order-smoothness assumption, we improve the rate on the expected gap to $\sqrt{\log(d)/n} + (\log(d)^{3/2}/[n\varepsilon])^{2/5}$. Under this additional assumption, we also show, by using bias-reduced gradient estimators, that the duality gap is bounded by $\log(d)/\sqrt{n} + \log(d)/[n\varepsilon]^{1/2}$ with constant success probability. This result provides evidence of the near-optimality of the approach. Finally, we show that combining our methods with acceleration techniques from online learning leads to the first algorithm for DP Stochastic Convex Optimization in the polyhedral setting that is not based on Frank-Wolfe methods. For convex and first-order-smooth stochastic objectives, our algorithms attain an excess risk of $\sqrt{\log(d)/n} + \log(d)^{7/10}/[n\varepsilon]^{2/5}$, and when additionally assuming second-order-smoothness, we improve the rate to $\sqrt{\log(d)/n} + \log(d)/\sqrt{n\varepsilon}$. Instrumental to all of these results are various extensions of the classical Maurey Sparsification Lemma, which may be of independent interest.
Tomás González 0002, Cristóbal Guzmán, Courtney Paquette
COLT1
2023 Faster Rates of Convergence to Stationary Points in Differentially Private Optimization
abstract
We study the problem of approximating stationary points of Lipschitz and smooth functions under $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-differential privacy (DP) in both the finite-sum and stochastic settings. A point $\widehat{w}$ is called an $\alpha$-stationary point of a function $F:\mathbb{R}^d\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ if $\|\nabla F(\widehat{w})\|\leq \alpha$. We give a new construction that improves over the existing rates in the stochastic optimization setting, where the goal is to find approximate stationary points of the population risk given $n$ samples. Our construction finds a $\tilde{O}\big(\frac{1}{n^{1/3}} + \big[\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n\varepsilon}\big]^{1/2}\big)$-stationary point of the population risk in time linear in $n$. We also provide an efficient algorithm that finds an $\tilde{O}\big(\big[\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n\varepsilon}\big]^{2/3}\big)$-stationary point in the finite-sum setting. This improves on the previous best rate of $\tilde{O}\big(\big[\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n\varepsilon}\big]^{1/2}\big)$. Furthermore, under the additional assumption of convexity, we completely characterize the sample complexity of finding stationary points of the population risk (up to polylog factors) and show that the optimal rate on population stationarity is $\tilde \Theta\big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+\frac{\sqrt{d}}{n\varepsilon}\big)$. Finally, we show that our methods can be used to provide dimension-independent rates of $O\big(\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+\min\big(\big[\frac{\sqrt{rank}}{n\varepsilon}\big]^{2/3},\frac{1}{(n\varepsilon)^{2/5}}\big)\big)$ on population stationarity for Generalized Linear Models (GLM), where $rank$ is the rank of the design matrix, which improves upon the previous best known rate.
Raman Arora, Raef Bassily, Tomás González 0002, Cristóbal Guzmán, Michael Menart, Enayat Ullah
ICML3