Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam Dankowiakowski
dblp:438/7526
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automata and formal languages · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automata and formal languages
regular languages |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Automata and formal languages › regular languages
star-free languages |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metric automata theory · 1.7finite-precision analysis · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNsabstractWe propose Metric Automata Theory, an elegant generalisation of classic Automata Theory to continuous dynamical systems, that constitutes a unifying theory of all kinds of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), including widely-adopted architectures such as xLSTM and State Space Models (SSMs). The theory allows one to analyse RNNs both in the finite and unbounded precision settings seamlessly, while utilising fundamental results of Automata Theory. It also provides a novel notion of robustness that guarantees numerical stability and contributes to stability of learning. We employ the theory to prove a comprehensive set of expressivity results for widely-adopted RNNs, with a focus on robustness and finite-precision. Notably, we contrast the capabilities of xLSTM and SSMs for robustly modelling all star-free regular languages—xLSTM can do so, while SSMs cannot robustly recognize the FLIP-FLOP language. Thus we give a novel perspective on the importance of non-linear recurrences, giving insight for why xLSTM shows superior performance to SSMs on several tasks. We provide an improved understanding of the capabilities of Mamba, a popular SSM model. We show that Mamba is not generally capable of recognising the star-free languages under finite-precision, which is seemingly in contrast with the existing theoretical and empirical results for SSMs. We clarify the picture, by showing that Mamba admits a piecewise-linearly separable state space that allows it to approximate star-free languages, with some
length-generalisation abilities. At the same time, Mamba does not admit such state spaces for languages like Parity. This explains why empirically Mamba performs well on star-free languages, and fails on Parity. Adam Dankowiakowski, Alessandro Ronca |
NeurIPS | 1 |