Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adam Dankowiakowski

dblp:438/7526 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automata and formal languages
regular languages
0.912025
Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025
Automata and formal languages › regular languages
star-free languages
0.912025
Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.312025
Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model
0.312025
Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metric automata theory · 1.7finite-precision analysis · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Metric Automata Theory: A Unifying Theory of RNNs
abstract
We propose Metric Automata Theory, an elegant generalisation of classic Automata Theory to continuous dynamical systems, that constitutes a unifying theory of all kinds of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), including widely-adopted architectures such as xLSTM and State Space Models (SSMs). The theory allows one to analyse RNNs both in the finite and unbounded precision settings seamlessly, while utilising fundamental results of Automata Theory. It also provides a novel notion of robustness that guarantees numerical stability and contributes to stability of learning. We employ the theory to prove a comprehensive set of expressivity results for widely-adopted RNNs, with a focus on robustness and finite-precision. Notably, we contrast the capabilities of xLSTM and SSMs for robustly modelling all star-free regular languages—xLSTM can do so, while SSMs cannot robustly recognize the FLIP-FLOP language. Thus we give a novel perspective on the importance of non-linear recurrences, giving insight for why xLSTM shows superior performance to SSMs on several tasks. We provide an improved understanding of the capabilities of Mamba, a popular SSM model. We show that Mamba is not generally capable of recognising the star-free languages under finite-precision, which is seemingly in contrast with the existing theoretical and empirical results for SSMs. We clarify the picture, by showing that Mamba admits a piecewise-linearly separable state space that allows it to approximate star-free languages, with some length-generalisation abilities. At the same time, Mamba does not admit such state spaces for languages like Parity. This explains why empirically Mamba performs well on star-free languages, and fails on Parity.
Adam Dankowiakowski, Alessandro Ronca
NeurIPS1