Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Majed Dodin

dblp:439/1119 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
a/b testing
0.912025
YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.912025
YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
sequential testing
0.912025
YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test · NeurIPS 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

threshold crossing bound · 1.7maximal inequality · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 YEAST: Yet Another Sequential Test
abstract
The online evaluation of machine learning models is typically conducted through A/B experiments. Sequential statistical tests are valuable tools for analysing these experiments, as they enable researchers to stop data collection early without increasing the risk of false discoveries. However, existing sequential tests either limit the number of interim analyses or suffer from low statistical power. In this paper, we introduce a novel sequential test designed for the continuous monitoring of A/B experiments. We validate our method using semi-synthetic simulations and demonstrate that it outperforms current state-of-the-art sequential testing approaches. Our method is derived using a new technique that inverts a bound on the probability of threshold crossing, based on a classical maximal inequality.
Alexey Kurennoy, Majed Dodin, Tural Gurbanov, Ana Peleteiro-Ramallo
NeurIPS2