Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ziyang Ling

dblp:439/2794 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
multi-hop question answering
1.012026
THOR: A Theta-Gamma Hierarchical Oscillatory Reasoning Framework for Multi-hop QA · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
multi-hop reasoning
1.012026
THOR: A Theta-Gamma Hierarchical Oscillatory Reasoning Framework for Multi-hop QA · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

verification and repair · 1.0theta-gamma hierarchical oscillation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 THOR: A Theta-Gamma Hierarchical Oscillatory Reasoning Framework for Multi-hop QA
abstract
Multi-hop question answering requires retrieving and integrating evidence from multiple contexts.Despite the rapid progress of current research, multi-hop reasoning remains constrained by two persistent limitations: attention decay, where the model's focus on main question degrades as the reasoning chain grows, and error accumulation, where mistakes propagate across hops and compounds into final failure.Inspired by Theta-Gamma hierarchical oscillation which decouples global planning from local retrieval, enabling efficient attention transfer between hops and a verification and repair mechanism that interrupts the accumulation of errors in the wrong paths, we present THOR, a brain-inspired Theta-Gamma hierarchical oscillatory reasoning framework.Extensive comparative experiments and specific validation experiments on multi-hop QA benchmarks demonstrate that THOR improves answer accuracy and robustness while mitigating limitations, showcasing its generalization across different backbones.
Ziyang Ling, Ronald X. Xu, Mingzhai Sun
ACL (1)1