Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hyeondong Woo
dblp:439/3055
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Vision and language · 25% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
test-time adaptation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias mitigation
vision-language model debiasing |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward Gating · ACL (1) 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
test-time adaptation · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Selective Test-Time Debiasing for CLIP via Reward GatingabstractVision language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong zero-shot performance, but often perpetuate social stereotypes in person-centric queries, yielding skewed demographic distributions.Current debiasing methods apply uniform bias corrections across all input queries regardless of their bias sensitivity, creating a fundamental fairness-utility trade-off.Strong debiasing distorts semantically meaningful information in bias-insensitive queries, while weak debiasing fails to mitigate stereotypes in biassensitive ones.This one-size-fits-all approach hampers simultaneously achieving high utility on bias-insensitive queries and fairness on bias-sensitive queries.We introduce Reward-Gated Test-Time Adaptation (RG-TTA), a reinforcement learning-based test-time adaptation framework that selectively applies debiasing based on input sensitivity.RG-TTA adaptively triggers fairness regularization based on the bias sensitivity of each input during testtime policy adaptation, while focusing exclusively on optimizing cross-modal alignment for bias-insensitive inputs.Experiments on fairness benchmarks (e.g., FairFace, UTKFace) demonstrate substantial bias reduction while simultaneously improving zero-shot utility, resolving the trade-off of uniform debiasing. Jaeho Han, Jisoo Yang, Hyeondong Woo, Mingyu Jeon, Sunjae Yoon, Junyeong Kim |
ACL (1) | 3 |