Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pierre Fihey

dblp:439/3064 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Time series and sequential data · 33% Information extraction and text analysis · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
anomaly detection
1.012026
Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › representation geometry
embedding geometry
1.012026
Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text mining
text anomaly detection
1.012026
Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation · ACL (1) 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

similarity-trained embeddings · 1.0post-processing of embeddings · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Enhancing Two Steps Textual Anomaly Detection through Anisotropy Mitigation
abstract
Anomaly detection aims at distinguishing between in-distribution samples, which belong to the same distribution as the training set, and out-of-distribution samples, which lie outside of it.In textual anomaly detection, recent approaches routinely apply anomaly detection algorithms directly to embeddings extracted from pre-trained embedding models (two-stage approaches).However, the geometric properties of pre-trained embeddings can hinder the effectiveness of detection algorithms, which often rely on distance-based measures.In this work, we first highlight the relevance of similaritytrained models for textual anomaly detection.Beyond being trained to capture semantic similarities, these models also exhibit geometric properties that appear better suited to detection algorithms.We further demonstrate that, besides model choice, a simple post-processing step can significantly improve anomaly detection by adapting embeddings to the assumptions made by classical detection algorithms.The bulk of our experiments is done on a reformulation of the classification tasks from the MTEB benchmark into anomaly detection tasks 1 .
Pierre Fihey, Matthieu Labeau, Pavlo Mozharovskyi
ACL (1)1