Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samuel Okyay
dblp:439/8488
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Logic in computer science · 50% Automated reasoning and model checking · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Logic in computer science
bisimulation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Complexity of Bisimilarity and Model Checking in Finitary Diagrams · ICALP 2026 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
model checking |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | The Complexity of Bisimilarity and Model Checking in Finitary Diagrams · ICALP 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
randomized algorithm · 1.0existential theory of invertible matrices · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | The Complexity of Bisimilarity and Model Checking in Finitary DiagramsabstractInspired by the work of Dubut, Goubault, and Goubault-Larrecq (ICALP 2015) on natural homology, Dubut (RAMiCS 2020) introduces finitary diagrams and studies bisimilarity and diagrammatic path logics for them. To this aim, he defines a fragment of the existential theory of the reals, called the existential theory of invertible matrices (ETIM). Using a PSPACE upper bound for this fragment, he proves that for finitary diagrams, bisimilarity can be decided in EXPSPACE and model checking for diagrammatic path logic in PSPACE. We significantly improve both these bounds and settle the complexity of model checking for finitary diagrams. As our first main result, we show that there is an efficient randomized algorithm for ETIM. Combining this with the previous work by Dubut, we obtain an NEXP upper bound for bisimilarity of finitary diagrams and an NP upper bound for diagrammatic path logic. We also provide a matching NP-hardness proof for the latter. The hardness proof introduces constrained layered poset problems, which may be of independent interest, and connects them to finitary diagrams using Gabriel’s theorem for representations of path quivers. For bisimilarity over finite fields, we further improve the upper bound to PSPACE. In ETIM, we quantify over invertible matrices. We finally ask what happens if we instead quantify over matrices from the special linear group, that is, of determinant one. We show that in this case, the resulting fragment is equivalent to the existential theory of the reals, under a mild generalization of the allowed linear constraints. Markus Bläser, Samuel Okyay |
ICALP | 3 |