Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Antonio Poggiali
dblp:44/3851
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 54% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 23% Energy-efficient computing · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Energy-Efficient Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip for Embedded Computing: Exploring Programming Models and Their Architectural Support · IEEE Trans. Computers 2007 |
Energy-efficient computing
power-performance tradeoff |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Energy-Efficient Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip for Embedded Computing: Exploring Programming Models and Their Architectural Support · IEEE Trans. Computers 2007 |
Parallel and multicore computing
programming models |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Energy-Efficient Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip for Embedded Computing: Exploring Programming Models and Their Architectural Support · IEEE Trans. Computers 2007 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel programming models › hybrid programming models
shared memory and message passing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Energy-Efficient Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip for Embedded Computing: Exploring Programming Models and Their Architectural Support · IEEE Trans. Computers 2007 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Energy-Efficient Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip for Embedded Computing: Exploring Programming Models and Their Architectural Support · IEEE Trans. Computers 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hardware-software tuning · 0.1comparative analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Energy-Efficient Multiprocessor Systems-on-Chip for Embedded Computing: Exploring Programming Models and Their Architectural SupportabstractIn today's multiprocessor SoCs (MPSoCs), parallel programming models are needed to fully exploit hardware capabilities and to achieve the 100 Gops/W energy efficiency target required for ambient intelligence applications. However, mapping abstract programming models onto tightly power-constrained hardware architectures imposes overheads which might seriously compromise performance and energy efficiency. The objective of this work is to perform a comparative analysis of message passing versus shared memory as programming models for single-chip multiprocessor platforms. Our analysis is carried out from a hardware-software viewpoint: we carefully tune hardware architectures and software libraries for each programming model. We analyze representative application kernels from the multimedia domain, and identify application-level parameters that heavily influence performance and energy efficiency. Then, we formulate guidelines for the selection of the most appropriate programming model and its architectural support Francesco Poletti, Antonio Poggiali, Davide Bertozzi, Luca Benini, Paul Marchal, Mirko Loghi, Massimo Poncino |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |
| 2006 | Supporting task migration in multi-processor systems-on-chip: a feasibility studyabstractWith the advent of multi-processor systems-on-chip, the interest in process migration is again on the rise both in research and in product development. New challenges associated with the new scenario include increased sensitivity to implementation complexity, tight power budgets, requirements on execution predictability, the lack of virtual memory support in many low-end MPSoCs. As a consequence, effectiveness and applicability of traditional transparent migration mechanisms are put in discussion in this context. Our paper proposes a task management software infrastructure that is well suited for the constraints of single chip multiprocessors with distributed operating systems. Load balancing in the system is maintained by means of intelligent initial placement and task migration. We propose a user-managed migration scheme based on code checkpointing and user-level middleware support as an effective solution for many MPSoC application domains. In order to prove the practical viability of this scheme, we also propose a characterization methodology for task migration overhead. We derive the minimum execution time following a task migration event during which the system configuration should be frozen to make up for the migration cost. Stefano Bertozzi, Andrea Acquaviva, Davide Bertozzi, Antonio Poggiali |
DATE | 4 |
| 2005 | Flexible Hardware/Software Support for Message Passing on a Distributed Shared Memory ArchitectureabstractWith the advent of multiprocessor systems on a chip, the interest for message passing libraries has revived. Message passing helps in mastering the design complexity of parallel systems. However to satisfy the stringent energy-budget of embedded applications, the message passing overhead should be limited. Recently, several hardware extensions have been proposed for reducing the transfer cost on a distributed memory architecture. Unfortunately, they ignore the synchronization cost between sender/receiver and/or require many dedicated hardware blocks. To overcome the above limitations, we present in this paper lightweight support for message passing. Moreover, we have made our library as flexible as possible such that we can optimally match the application with the target architecture. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach by means of representative benchmarks from the multimedia domain. Francesco Poletti, Antonio Poggiali, Paul Marchal |
DATE | 2 |