Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tim Lawson

dblp:44/58 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 94% Language models and text generation · 6%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
1.722025
Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations · ICML 2025
Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEs · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › mechanistic interpretability
sparse autoencoder
1.722025
Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations · ICML 2025
Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEs · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
mechanistic interpretability
0.912025
Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › language model architecture
transformer language model
0.312025
Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEs · ICLR 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tuned-lens transformations · 0.9sparse coding · 0.9sparse autoencoder · 0.9jacobian computation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Residual Stream Analysis with Multi-Layer SAEs
abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) are a promising approach to interpreting the internal representations of transformer language models. However, SAEs are usually trained separately on each transformer layer, making it difficult to use them to study how information flows across layers. To solve this problem, we introduce the multi-layer SAE (MLSAE): a single SAE trained on the residual stream activation vectors from every transformer layer. Given that the residual stream is understood to preserve information across layers, we expected MLSAE latents to 'switch on' at a token position and remain active at later layers. Interestingly, we find that individual latents are often active at a single layer for a given token or prompt, but the layer at which an individual latent is active may differ for different tokens or prompts. We quantify these phenomena by defining a distribution over layers and considering its variance. We find that the variance of the distributions of latent activations over layers is about two orders of magnitude greater when aggregating over tokens compared with a single token. For larger underlying models, the degree to which latents are active at multiple layers increases, which is consistent with the fact that the residual stream activation vectors at adjacent layers become more similar. Finally, we relax the assumption that the residual stream basis is the same at every layer by applying pre-trained tuned-lens transformations, but our findings remain qualitatively similar. Our results represent a new approach to understanding how representations change as they flow through transformers. We release our code to train and analyze MLSAEs at https://github.com/tim-lawson/mlsae.
Tim Lawson, Lucy Farnik, Conor J. Houghton, Laurence Aitchison
ICLR1
2025 Jacobian Sparse Autoencoders: Sparsify Computations, Not Just Activations
abstract
Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) have been successfully used to discover sparse and human-interpretable representations of the latent activations of language models (LLMs). However, we would ultimately like to understand the computations performed by LLMs and not just their representations. The extent to which SAEs can help us understand computations is unclear because they are not designed to “sparsify” computations in any sense, only latent activations. To solve this, we propose Jacobian sparse autoencoders (JSAEs), which yield not only sparsity in the input and output activations of a given model component but also sparsity in the computation (formally, the Jacobian) connecting them. With a naïve implementation, the Jacobians in LLMs would be computationally intractable due to their size. Our key technical contribution is thus finding an efficient way of computing Jacobians in this setup. We find that JSAEs extract a relatively large degree of computational sparsity while preserving downstream LLM performance approximately as well as traditional SAEs. We also show that JSAEs achieve a greater degree of computational sparsity on pre-trained LLMs than on the equivalent randomized LLM. This shows that the sparsity of the computational graph appears to be a property that LLMs learn through training, and suggests that JSAEs might be more suitable for understanding learned transformer computations than standard SAEs.
Lucy Farnik, Tim Lawson, Conor J. Houghton, Laurence Aitchison
ICML2