Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Timothy James Hitge

dblp:441/9100 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
surrogate modeling
0.912025
SMRS: advocating a unified reporting standard for surrogate models in the artificial intelligence era · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering
computational reproducibility
0.312025
SMRS: advocating a unified reporting standard for surrogate models in the artificial intelligence era · NeurIPS 2025
Computational science and engineering › scientific data management
data standardization
0.312025
SMRS: advocating a unified reporting standard for surrogate models in the artificial intelligence era · NeurIPS 2025
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SMRS: advocating a unified reporting standard for surrogate models in the artificial intelligence era
abstract
Surrogate models are widely used to approximate complex systems across science and engineering to reduce computational costs. Despite their widespread adoption, the field lacks standardisation across key stages of the modelling pipeline, including data sampling, model selection, evaluation, and downstream analysis. This fragmentation limits reproducibility and cross-domain utility – a challengefurther exacerbated by the rapid proliferation of AI-driven surrogate models. We argue for the urgent need to establish a structured reporting standard, the Surrogate Model Reporting Standard (SMRS), that systematically captures essential design and evaluation choices while remaining agnostic to implementation specifics. By promoting a standardised yet flexible framework, we aim to improve the reliabilityof surrogate modelling, foster interdisciplinary knowledge transfer, and, as a result, accelerate scientific progress in the AI era.
Elizaveta Semenova, Siobhan Mackenzie Hall, Timothy James Hitge, Alisa Sheinkman, Jon Cockayne
NeurIPS3