Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert D. Laramore

dblp:45/10290 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1976
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 67% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 33%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image analysis
image detection
0.011976
Detection in image dependent noise (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1976
Image and video processing › image statistics › statistical image modeling › noise modeling
signal-dependent noise
0.011976
Detection in image dependent noise (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1976

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hypothesis testing · 0.0decision rules · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1976 Detection in image dependent noise (Corresp.)
abstract
The detection of two-dimensional optical signals which have been corrupted by noise is considered. Discussion is limited to the detection of a known object in a known location. The problem is approached from the classical statistical technique of hypothesis testing. Initially the solution is formulated in very general terms. The decision rule is derived for a signal distorted by noise of an unspecified type which may include signal dependent noise. Once the decision rule is obtained, the probabilities of false alarm and detection are evaluated from a{\sl a priori}knowledge of the noise and imaging system. The general results are applied to Poisson noise, signal dependent Gaussian noise, and binomial noise.
David R. Cunningham, Robert D. Laramore, Eamon Barrett
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2