Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mitrick A. Johns

dblp:45/10530 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.112011
Pico-inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics › genome rearrangement
inversion detection
0.112011
Pico-inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variation detection
0.112011
Pico-inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

likelihood ratio test · 0.1alignment analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Pico-inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee
abstract
MOTIVATION: There have been several studies on the micro-inversions between human and chimpanzee, but there are large discrepancies among their results. Furthermore, all of them rely on alignment procedures or existing alignment results to identify inversions. However, the core alignment procedures do not take very small inversions into consideration. Therefore, their analyses cannot find inversions that are too small to be detected by a classic aligner. We call such inversions pico-inversions. RESULTS: We re-analyzed human-chimpanzee alignment from the UCSC Genome Browser for micro-inplace-inversions and screened for pico-inplace-inversions using a likelihood ratio test. We report that the quantity of inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee is substantially greater than what had previously been discovered. We also present the software tool PicoInversionMiner to detect pico-inplace-inversions between closely related species. AVAILABILITY: Software tools, scripts and result data are available at http://faculty.cs.niu.edu/~hou/PicoInversion.html. CONTACT: [email protected].
Minmei Hou, Ping Yao, Angela Antonou, Mitrick A. Johns
Bioinform.4