Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rayyan G. Jaber

dblp:45/1686 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 56% Internet of things and sensor networks · 28% Physical-layer communications · 17%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet of things and sensor networks
erasure networks
0.112011
A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Wireless networking
mobile ad hoc networks
0.112011
A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Wireless networking
network capacity
0.112011
A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Physical-layer communications
interference
0.012011
A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Physical-layer communications
outage probability
0.012011
A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Information theory › communication channels › channel models › discrete memoryless channel
erasure channel
0.012011
A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic geometry · 0.2asymptotic analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A Lower Bound on the Capacity of Wireless Erasure Networks
abstract
In this paper, a lower bound on the capacity of wireless ad hoc erasure networks is derived in closed form in the case where n nodes are uniformly and independently distributed in the unit area square. It holds almost surely and is asymptotically tight. Nodes are assumed to have fixed transmit power; hence, two nodes should be within a specified distance rnto overcome noise. With interference determining outages, each transmitter-receiver pair is modeled as an erasure channel with a broadcast constraint, i.e., each node can transmit only one signal across all its outgoing links. A lower bound of Θ(nrn) for the network capacity is derived when erasures across distinct links are independent, with constant erasure probabilities. When erasures are correlated, the lower bound Θ(1/(rn)) is proved. If the broadcast constraint is relaxed, the gain is a function of rnand the link erasure probabilities, and is at most a constant if the erasure probabilities grow sufficiently large with n. Finally, the case where the erasure probabilities are random variables, for example due to randomness in geometry or channels, is analyzed. In this setting, it is shown somewhat surprisingly that variability in erasure probabilities increases network capacity.
Rayyan G. Jaber, Jeffrey G. Andrews
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2009 A lower bound on the capacity of wireless erasure networks with random node locations
abstract
In this paper, a lower bound on the capacity of wireless ad hoc erasure networks is derived in closed form in the canonical case where n nodes are uniformly and independently distributed in the unit area square. The bound holds almost surely and is asymptotically tight. We assume all nodes have fixed transmit power and hence two nodes should be within a specified distance rnof each other to overcome noise. In this context, interference determines outages, so we model each transmitter-receiver pair as an erasure channel with a broadcast constraint, i.e. each node can transmit only one signal across all its outgoing links. A lower bound of ¿-(nrn) for the capacity of this class of networks is derived. Finally, the case where the erasure probabilities are themselves random variables, for example due to randomness in geometry or channels, is analyzed. We prove somewhat surprisingly that in this setting, variability in erasure probabilities increases network capacity.
Rayyan G. Jaber, Jeffrey G. Andrews
ISIT1