Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard C. Wang
dblp:45/3723
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0003-4543-8295ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 5 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Information extraction and text analysis · 47% Learning paradigms · 20% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 19% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data mining · 73% Data integration and cleaning · 14% Information retrieval · 14% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
web information extraction |
0.3 | 2 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 Automatic Set Instance Extraction using the Web · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
weakly supervised extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Distant IE by Bootstrapping Using Lists and Document Structure · AAAI 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › relation extraction
distant supervision |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improving Distant Supervision for Information Extraction Using Label Propagation Through Lists · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › named entity recognition
entity mention detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improving Distant Supervision for Information Extraction Using Label Propagation Through Lists · EMNLP 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
label propagation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improving Distant Supervision for Information Extraction Using Label Propagation Through Lists · EMNLP 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
never-ending learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
noisy label correction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improving Distant Supervision for Information Extraction Using Label Propagation Through Lists · EMNLP 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › ontology › ontology evolution
ontology extension |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Never-Ending Learning · AAAI 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › named entity processing
entity set expansion |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Character-level Analysis of Semi-Structured Documents for Set Expansion · EMNLP 2009 Automatic Set Expansion for List Question Answering · EMNLP 2008 |
Data mining › text mining › information extraction
set expansion |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Iterative Set Expansion of Named Entities Using the Web · ICDM 2008 Language-Independent Set Expansion of Named Entities Using the Web · ICDM 2007 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
list question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Automatic Set Expansion for List Question Answering · EMNLP 2008 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › document analysis › scholarly text analysis
scientific information extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Understanding captions in biomedical publications · KDD 2003 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Understanding captions in biomedical publications · KDD 2003 |
Data integration and cleaning › data extraction
web data extraction |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Automatic Set Instance Extraction using the Web · ACL/IJCNLP 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Understanding captions in biomedical publications · KDD 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
bootstrapping · 0.3web mining · 0.3label propagation · 0.2graph-based semi-supervised learning · 0.2character-level analysis · 0.2supervised learning · 0.1random walk with restart · 0.1hand-coded rules · 0.1bayesian sets · 0.1automatic set expansion · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Distant IE by Bootstrapping Using Lists and Document StructureabstractDistant labeling for information extraction (IE) suffers from noisy training data. We describe a way of reducing the noise associated with distant IE by identifying coupling constraints between potential instance labels. As one example of coupling,items in a list are likely to have the same label.A second example of coupling comes from analysis of document structure: in some corpora,sections can be identified such that items in the same section are likely to have the same label. Such sections do not exist in all corpora, but we show that augmenting a large corpus with coupling constraints from even a small, well-structured corpus can improve performance substantially, doubling F1 on one task. Lidong Bing, Mingyang Ling 0001, Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2015 | Never-Ending LearningabstractWhereas people learn many different types of knowledge from diverse experiences over many years, most current machine learning systems acquire just a single function or data model from just a single data set. We propose a never-ending learning paradigm for machine learning, to better reflect the more ambitious and encompassing type of learning performed by humans. As a case study, we describe the Never-Ending Language Learner (NELL), which achieves some of the desired properties of a never-ending learner, and we discuss lessons learned. NELL has been learning to read the web 24 hours/day since January 2010, and so far has acquired a knowledge base with over 80 million confidence-weighted beliefs (e.g., servedWith(tea, biscuits)). NELL has also learned millions of features and parameters that enable it to read these beliefs from the web. Additionally, it has learned to reason over these beliefs to infer new beliefs, and is able to extend its ontology by synthesizing new relational predicates. NELL can be tracked online at http://rtw.ml.cmu.edu, and followed on Twitter at @CMUNELL. Tom M. Mitchell, William W. Cohen, Estevam Hruschka, Partha P. Talukdar, Justin Betteridge, Andrew Carlson, Bhavana Dalvi, Matt Gardner 0001, Bryan Kisiel, Jayant Krishnamurthy, Ni Lao, Kathryn Mazaitis, Thahir Mohamed, Ndapandula Nakashole, Emmanouil A. Platanios, Alan Ritter, Mehdi Samadi, Burr Settles, Richard C. Wang, Derry Wijaya, Abhinav Gupta 0001, Xinlei Chen, Abulhair Saparov, Malcolm Greaves, Joel Welling |
AAAI | 19 |
| 2015 | Improving Distant Supervision for Information Extraction Using Label Propagation Through ListsabstractBecause of polysemy, distant labeling for information extraction leads to noisy training data.We describe a procedure for reducing this noise by using label propagation on a graph in which the nodes are entity mentions, and mentions are coupled when they occur in coordinate list structures.We show that this labeling approach leads to good performance even when off-the-shelf classifiers are used on the distantly-labeled data. Lidong Bing, Sneha Chaudhari, Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2010 | Coupled semi-supervised learning for information extractionabstractWe consider the problem of semi-supervised learning to extract categories (e.g., academic fields, athletes) and relations (e.g., PlaysSport(athlete, sport)) from web pages, starting with a handful of labeled training examples of each category or relation, plus hundreds of millions of unlabeled web documents. Semi-supervised training using only a few labeled examples is typically unreliable because the learning task is underconstrained. This paper pursues the thesis that much greater accuracy can be achieved by further constraining the learning task, by coupling the semi-supervised training of many extractors for different categories and relations. We characterize several ways in which the training of category and relation extractors can be coupled, and present experimental results demonstrating significantly improved accuracy as a result. Andrew Carlson, Justin Betteridge, Richard C. Wang, Estevam Hruschka, Tom M. Mitchell |
WSDM | 3 |
| 2009 | Automatic Set Instance Extraction using the Web
Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
ACL/IJCNLP | 1 |
| 2009 | Character-level Analysis of Semi-Structured Documents for Set Expansion
Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2009 | Populating the Semantic Web by Macro-reading Internet Text
Tom M. Mitchell, Justin Betteridge, Andrew Carlson, Estevam Hruschka, Richard C. Wang |
ISWC | 5 |
| 2008 | Automatic Set Expansion for List Question Answering
Richard C. Wang, Nico Schlaefer, William W. Cohen, Eric Nyberg |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2008 | Iterative Set Expansion of Named Entities Using the WebabstractSet expansion refers to expanding a partial set of "seed" objects into a more complete set. One system that does set expansion is SEAL (set expander for any language), which expands entities automatically by utilizing resources from the Web in a language independent fashion. In a previous study, SEAL showed good set expansion performance using three seed entities; however, when given a larger set of seeds (e.g., ten), SEAL's expansion method performs poorly. In this paper, we present iterative SEAL (iSEAL), which allows a user to provide many seeds. Briefly, iSEAL makes several calls to SEAL, each call using a small number of seeds. We also show that iSEAL can be used in a "bootstrapping" manner, where each call to SEAL uses a mixture of user-provided and self-generated seeds. We show that the bootstrapping version of iSEAL obtains better results than SEAL even when using fewer user-provided seeds. In addition, we compare the performance of various ranking algorithms used in iSEAL, and show that the choice of ranking method has a small effect on performance when all seeds are user-provided, but a large effect when iSEAL is bootstrapped. In particular, we show that random walk with restart is nearly as good as Bayesian sets with user-provided seeds, and performs best with bootstrapped seeds. Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2007 | Language-Independent Set Expansion of Named Entities Using the WebabstractSet expansion refers to expanding a given partial set of objects into a more complete set. A well-known example system that does set expansion using the web is Google Sets. In this paper, we propose a novel method for expanding sets of named entities. The approach can be applied to semi-structured documents written in any markup language and in any human language. We present experimental results on 36 benchmark sets in three languages, showing that our system is superior to Google Sets in terms of mean average precision. Richard C. Wang, William W. Cohen |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2006 | NER Systems that Suit User's Preferences: Adjusting the Recall-Precision Trade-off for Entity Extraction
Einat Minkov, Richard C. Wang, Anthony Tomasic, William W. Cohen |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |
| 2003 | Understanding captions in biomedical publicationsabstractFrom the standpoint of the automated extraction of scientific knowledge, an important but little-studied part of scientific publications are the figures and accompanying captions. Captions are dense in information, but also contain many extra-grammatical constructs, making them awkward to process with standard information extraction methods. We propose a scheme for "understanding" captions in biomedical publications by extracting and classifying "image pointers" (references to the accompanying image). We evaluate a number of automated methods for this task, including hand-coded methods, methods based on existing learning techniques, and methods based on novel learning techniques. The best of these methods leads to a usefully accurate tool for caption-understanding, with both recall and precision in excess of 94% on the most important single class in a combined extraction/classification task. William W. Cohen, Richard C. Wang, Robert F. Murphy |
KDD | 2 |