Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shimpei Yagyu

dblp:45/4657 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Internet architecture and protocols · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Internet architecture and protocols
ISDN
0.011997
Performance Characteristics of the D Channel Access Control Scheme · INFOCOM 1997
Performance modeling and evaluation
analytical modeling
0.011997
Performance Characteristics of the D Channel Access Control Scheme · INFOCOM 1997
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011997
Performance Characteristics of the D Channel Access Control Scheme · INFOCOM 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0analytical modeling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Performance Characteristics of the D Channel Access Control Scheme
abstract
In the basic user/network interface of N-ISDN (ITU-T Recommendation I.430), the D channel is shared by up to 8 terminals for signal and data packets. An analytical model is proposed to reveal the performance characteristics of the access control scheme for the D channel. Numerical and simulation results are shown to demonstrate the performance differentiation of the terminals with different priorities. It is observed that the mean signal delay at a low load become large because of the long service time for packets and that the priority mechanism may not work properly when the loads at the terminals are very asymmetric.
Shimpei Yagyu, Hideaki Takagi
INFOCOM1