This paper studies planar drawings of graphs in which each vertex is represented as a point along a sequence of horizontal lines, called levels, and each edge is either a horizontal segment or a strictly y -monotone curve. A graph is s -span weakly leveled planar if it admits such a drawing where the edges have span at most s ; the span of an edge is the number of levels it touches minus one. We investigate the problem of computing s -span weakly leveled planar drawings from both the computational and the combinatorial perspectives. We prove the problem to be para-NP-hard with respect to its natural parameter s and investigate its complexity with respect to widely used structural parameters. We show the existence of a polynomial-size kernel with respect to vertex cover number and prove that the problem is FPT when parameterized by treedepth. We also present upper and lower bounds on the span for various graph classes. Notably, we show that cycle trees, a family of 2-outerplanar graphs generalizing Halin graphs, are Θ(log n )-span weakly leveled planar and 4-span weakly leveled planar when 3-connected. As a byproduct of these combinatorial results, we obtain improved bounds on the edge-length ratio of the graph families under consideration.

We consider geometric collision-detection problems for modular reconfigurable robots. Assuming the nodes (modules) are connected squares on a grid, we investigate the complexity of deciding whether collisions may occur, or can be avoided, if a set of expansion and contraction operations is executed. We study both discrete- and continuous-time models, and allow operations to be coupled into a single parallel group. Our algorithms to decide if a collision may occur run in O ( n 2 log 2 n ) time, O ( n 2 ) time, or O ( n log 2 n ) time, depending on the presence and type of coupled operations, in a continuous-time model for a modular robot with n nodes. To decide if collisions can be avoided, we show that a very restricted version is already NP-complete in the discrete-time model, while the same problem is polynomial in the continuous-time model. A less restricted version is NP-hard in the continuous-time model.

In this paper, we explore the exponential growth of geometric structures starting from a single node, focusing on centralized growth operations. We identify a parameter k , representing the number of turning points within specific parts of a shape. We prove that, if edges can only be formed between a newly generated node and the node that created it and cannot be deleted, trees having at most k turning points on every root-to-leaf path can be grown in O ( k log ⁡ k + log ⁡ n ) time steps and spirals with O ( log ⁡ n ) turning points can be grown in O ( log ⁡ n ) time steps, n being the size of the final shape. For this model, we also show that the maximum number of turning points in a root-to-leaf path of a tree is a lower bound on the number of time steps to grow the tree and that there exists a class of paths such that any path in the class with k turning points requires Ω ( k log ⁡ k ) time steps to be grown. If nodes can additionally be connected as soon as they become adjacent, we prove that if a shape S has a spanning tree with at most k turning points on every root-to-leaf path, then the adjacency closure of S can be grown in O ( k log ⁡ k + log ⁡ n ) time steps. In the strongest version of the model, where, additionally, edges can be deleted and neighbors handed over to new nodes, we present a universal algorithm for growing any shape S exponentially fast.

This paper studies planar drawings of graphs in which each vertex is represented as a point along a sequence of horizontal lines, called levels, and each edge is either a horizontal segment or a strictly $y$-monotone curve. A graph is $s$-span weakly leveled planar if it admits such a drawing where the edges have span at most $s$; the span of an edge is the number of levels it touches minus one. We investigate the problem of computing $s$-span weakly leveled planar drawings from both the computational and the combinatorial perspectives. We prove the problem to be para-NP-hard with respect to its natural parameter $s$ and investigate its complexity with respect to widely used structural parameters. We show the existence of a polynomial-size kernel with respect to vertex cover number and prove that the problem is FPT when parameterized by treedepth. We also present upper and lower bounds on the span for various graph classes. Notably, we show that cycle trees, a family of $2$-outerplanar graphs generalizing Halin graphs, are $Θ(\log n)$-span weakly leveled planar and $4$-span weakly leveled planar when $3$-connected. As a byproduct of these combinatorial results, we obtain improved bounds on the edge-length ratio of the graph families under consideration.

We study Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators, which is the problem of augmenting an n-vertex planar graph whose vertices are partitioned into independent sets (called clusters) with paths - one for each cluster - that connect all the vertices in each cluster while maintaining planarity. We show that the problem can be solved in time 2^𝒪(n) for both the variable and fixed embedding case. Moreover, we show that it can be solved in subexponential time 2^𝒪(√n log n) in the fixed embedding case if additionally the input graph is connected. The latter time complexity is tight under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. We also show that n can be replaced with the vertex cover number of the input graph by providing a linear (resp. polynomial) kernel for the variable-embedding (resp. fixed-embedding) case; these results contrast the NP-hardness of the problem on graphs of bounded treewidth (and even on trees). Finally, we complement known lower bounds for the problem by showing that Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators is NP-hard even when the number of clusters is at most 3, thus excluding the algorithmic use of the number of clusters as a parameter.

Abstract. An obstacle representation of a graph [Formula: see text] consists of a set of pairwise disjoint simply connected closed regions and a one-to-one mapping of the vertices of [Formula: see text] to points such that two vertices are adjacent in [Formula: see text] if and only if the line segment connecting the two corresponding points does not intersect any obstacle. The obstacle number of a graph is the smallest number of obstacles in an obstacle representation of the graph in the plane such that all obstacles are simple polygons. It is known that the obstacle number of each [Formula: see text]-vertex graph is [Formula: see text] [M. Balko, J. Cibulka, and P. Valtr, Discrete Comput. Geom., 59 (2018), pp. 143–164] and that there are [Formula: see text]-vertex graphs whose obstacle number is [Formula: see text] [V. Dujmović and P. Morin, Electron. J. Combin., 22 (2015), 3.1]. We improve this lower bound to [Formula: see text] for simple polygons and to [Formula: see text] for convex polygons. To obtain these stronger bounds, we improve known estimates on the number of [Formula: see text]-vertex graphs with bounded obstacle number, solving a conjecture by Dujmović and Morin. We also show that if the drawing of some [Formula: see text]-vertex graph is given as part of the input, then for some drawings [Formula: see text] obstacles are required to turn them into an obstacle representation of the graph. Our bounds are asymptotically tight in several instances. We complement these combinatorial bounds by two complexity results. First, we show that computing the obstacle number of a graph [Formula: see text] is fixed-parameter tractable in the vertex cover number of [Formula: see text]. Second, we show that, given a graph [Formula: see text] and a simple polygon [Formula: see text], it is NP-hard to decide whether [Formula: see text] admits an obstacle representation using [Formula: see text] as the only obstacle.

We initiate the study of the parameterized complexity of the Collective Graph Exploration (CGE) problem. In CGE, the input consists of an undirected connected graph G and a collection of k robots, initially placed at the same vertex r of G, and each one of them has an energy budget of B. The objective is to decide whether G can be explored by the k robots in B time steps, i.e., there exist k closed walks in G, one corresponding to each robot, such that every edge is covered by at least one walk, every walk starts and ends at the vertex r, and the maximum length of any walk is at most B. Unfortunately, this problem is NP-hard even on trees [Fraigniaud et al., 2006]. Further, we prove that the problem remains W[1]-hard parameterized by k even for trees of treedepth 3. Due to the para-NP-hardness of the problem parameterized by treedepth, and motivated by real-world scenarios, we study the parameterized complexity of the problem parameterized by the vertex cover number (vc) of the graph, and prove that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by vc. Additionally, we study the optimization version of CGE, where we want to optimize B, and design an approximation algorithm with an additive approximation factor of O(vc).

Over the past decade, we witness an increasing amount of interest in the design of exact exponential-time and parameterized algorithms for problems in Graph Drawing. Unfortunately, we still lack knowledge of general methods to develop such algorithms. An even more serious issue is that, here, "standard" parameters very often yield intractability. In particular, for the most common structural parameter, namely, treewidth, we frequently observe NP-hardness already when the input graphs are restricted to have constant (often, being just $1$ or $2$) treewidth. Our work deals with both drawbacks simultaneously. We introduce a novel form of tree decomposition that, roughly speaking, does not decompose (only) a graph, but an entire drawing. As such, its bags and separators are of geometric (rather than only combinatorial) nature. While the corresponding parameter -- like treewidth -- can be arbitrarily smaller than the height (and width) of the drawing, we show that -- unlike treewidth -- it gives rise to efficient algorithms. Specifically, we get slice-wise polynomial (XP) time algorithms parameterized by our parameter. We present a general scheme for the design of such algorithms, and apply it to several central problems in Graph Drawing, including the recognition of grid graphs, minimization of crossings and bends, and compaction. Other than for the class of problems we discussed in the paper, we believe that our decomposition and scheme are of independent interest and can be further extended or generalized to suit even a wider class of problems. Additionally, we discuss classes of drawings where our parameter is bounded by $O(\sqrt{n})$ (where $n$ is the number of vertices of the graph), yielding subexponential-time algorithms. Lastly, we prove which relations exist between drawn treewidth and other width measures, including treewidth, pathwidth, (dual) carving-width and embedded-width.

We consider the Sparse Hitting Set (Sparse-HS) problem, where we are given a set system $(V,\mathcal{F},\mathcal{B})$ with two families $\mathcal{F},\mathcal{B}$ of subsets of $V$. The task is to find a hitting set for $\mathcal{F}$ that minimizes the maximum number of elements in any of the sets of $\mathcal{B}$. Our focus is on determining the complexity of some special cases of Sparse-HS with respect to the sparseness $k$, which is the optimum number of hitting set elements in any set of $\mathcal{B}$. For the Sparse Vertex Cover (Sparse-VC) problem, $V$ is given by the vertex set of a graph, and $\mathcal{F}$ is its edge set. We prove NP-hardness for sparseness $k\geq 2$ and polynomial time solvability for $k=1$. We also provide a polynomial-time $2$-approximation for any $k$. A special case of Sparse-VC is Fair Vertex Cover (Fair-VC), where the family $\mathcal{B}$ is given by vertex neighbourhoods. For this problem we prove NP-hardness for constant $k$ and provide a polynomial-time $(2-\frac{1}{k})$-approximation. This is better than any approximation possible for Sparse-VC or Vertex Cover (under UGC). We then consider two problems derived from Sparse-HS related to the highway dimension, a graph parameter modelling transportation networks. Most algorithms for graphs of low highway dimension compute solutions to the $r$-Shortest Path Cover ($r$-SPC) problem, where $r>0$, $\mathcal{F}$ contains all shortest paths of length between $r$ and $2r$, and $\mathcal{B}$ contains all balls of radius $2r$. There is an XP algorithm that computes solutions to $r$-SPC of sparseness at most $h$ if the input graph has highway dimension $h$, but the existence if an FPT algorithm was open. We prove that $r$-SPC and also the related $r$-Highway Dimension ($r$-HD) problem are both W[1]-hard. Furthermore, we prove that $r$-SPC admits a polynomial-time $O(\log n)$-approximation.

Grid graphs, and, more generally, k×r grid graphs, form one of the most basic classes of geometric graphs. Over the past few decades, a large body of works studied the (in)tractability of various computational problems on grid graphs, which often yield substantially faster algorithms than general graphs. Unfortunately, the recognition of a grid graph (given a graph G, decide whether it can be embedded into a grid graph) is particularly hard - it was shown to be NP-hard even on trees of pathwidth 3 already in 1987. Yet, in this paper, we provide several positive results in this regard in the framework of parameterized complexity (additionally, we present new and complementary hardness results). Specifically, our contribution is threefold. First, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by k+mcc where mcc is the maximum size of a connected component of G. This also implies that the problem is FPT parameterized by td+k where td is the treedepth of G, as td ≤ mcc (to be compared with the hardness for pathwidth 2 where k = 3). (We note that when k and r are unrestricted, the problem is trivially FPT parameterized by td.) Further, we derive as a corollary that strip packing is FPT with respect to the height of the strip plus the maximum of the dimensions of the packed rectangles, which was previously only known to be in XP. Second, we present a new parameterization, denoted a_G, relating graph distance to geometric distance, which may be of independent interest. We show that the problem is para-NP-hard parameterized by a_G, but FPT parameterized by a_G on trees, as well as FPT parameterized by k+a_G. Third, we show that the recognition of k× r grid graphs is NP-hard on graphs of pathwidth 2 where k = 3. Moreover, when k and r are unrestricted, we show that the problem is NP-hard on trees of pathwidth 2, but trivially solvable in polynomial time on graphs of pathwidth 1.

Abstract For a clustered graph, i.e, a graph whose vertex set is recursively partitioned into clusters, the C-Planarity Testing problem asks whether it is possible to find a planar embedding of the graph and a representation of each cluster as a region homeomorphic to a closed disk such that (1) the subgraph induced by each cluster is drawn in the interior of the corresponding disk, (2) each edge intersects any disk at most once, and (3) the nesting between clusters is reflected by the representation, i.e., child clusters are properly contained in their parent cluster. The computational complexity of this problem, whose study has been central to the theory of graph visualization since its introduction in 1995 [Feng, Cohen, and Eades, Planarity for clustered graphs, ESA’95], has only been recently settled [Fulek and Tóth, Atomic Embeddability, Clustered Planarity, and Thickenability, to appear at SODA’20]. Before such a breakthrough, the complexity question was still unsolved even when the graph has a prescribed planar embedding, i.e, for embedded clustered graphs. We show that the C-Planarity Testing problem admits a single-exponential single-parameter FPT (resp., XP) algorithm for embedded flat (resp., non-flat) clustered graphs, when parameterized by the carving-width of the dual graph of the input. These are the first FPT and XP algorithms for this long-standing open problem with respect to a single notable graph-width parameter. Moreover, the polynomial dependency of our FPT algorithm is smaller than the one of the algorithm by Fulek and Tóth. In particular, our algorithm runs in quadratic time for flat instances of bounded treewidth and bounded face size. To further strengthen the relevance of this result, we show that an algorithm with running time O(r(n)) for flat instances whose underlying graph has pathwidth 1 would result in an algorithm with running time O(r(n)) for flat instances and with running time $$O(r(n^2) + n^2)$$ O ( r ( n 2 ) + n 2 ) for general, possibly non-flat, instances.

We study a motion-planning problem inspired by the game Snake that models scenarios like the transportation of linked wagons towed by a locomotor to the movement of a group of agents that travel in an ``ant-like'' fashion. Given a ``snake-like'' robot with initial and final positions in an environment modeled by a graph, our goal is to decide whether the robot can reach the final position from the initial position without intersecting itself. Already on grid graphs, this problem is PSPACE-complete [Biasi and Ophelders, 2018]. Nevertheless, we prove that even on general graphs, it is solvable in time k^{O(k)}|I|^{O(1)} where k is the size of the robot, and |I| is the input size. Towards this, we give a novel application of color-coding to sparsify the configuration graph of the problem. We also show that the problem is unlikely to have a polynomial kernel even on grid graphs, but it admits a treewidth-reduction procedure. To the best of our knowledge, the study of the parameterized complexity of motion problems has been~largely~neglected, thus our work is pioneering in this regard.

For fixed h >= 2, we consider the task of adding to a graph G a set of weighted shortcut edges on the same vertex set, such that the length of a shortest h-hop path between any pair of vertices in the augmented graph is exactly the same as the original distance between these vertices in G. A set of shortcut edges with this property is called an exact h-hopset and may be applied in processing distance queries on graph G. In particular, a 2-hopset directly corresponds to a distributed distance oracle known as a hub labeling. In this work, we explore centralized distance oracles based on 3-hopsets and display their advantages in several practical scenarios. In particular, for graphs of constant highway dimension, and more generally for graphs of constant skeleton dimension, we show that 3-hopsets require exponentially fewer shortcuts per node than any previously described distance oracle, and also offer a speedup in query time when compared to simple oracles based on a direct application of 2-hopsets. Finally, we consider the problem of computing minimum-size h-hopset (for any h >= 2) for a given graph G, showing a polylogarithmic-factor approximation for the case of unique shortest path graphs. When h=3, for a given bound on the space used by the distance oracle, we provide a construction of hopset achieving polylog approximation both for space and query time compared to the optimal 3-hopset oracle given the space bound.

For a clustered graph, i.e, a graph whose vertex set is recursively partitioned into clusters, the C-Planarity Testing problem asks whether it is possible to find a planar embedding of the graph and a representation of each cluster as a region homeomorphic to a closed disk such that 1. the subgraph induced by each cluster is drawn in the interior of the corresponding disk, 2. each edge intersects any disk at most once, and 3. the nesting between clusters is reflected by the representation, i.e., child clusters are properly contained in their parent cluster. The computational complexity of this problem, whose study has been central to the theory of graph visualization since its introduction in 1995 [Feng, Cohen, and Eades, Planarity for clustered graphs, ESA'95], has only been recently settled [Fulek and Tóth, Atomic Embeddability, Clustered Planarity, and Thickenability, to appear at SODA'20]. Before such a breakthrough, the complexity question was still unsolved even when the graph has a prescribed planar embedding, i.e, for embedded clustered graphs. We show that the C-Planarity Testing problem admits a single-exponential single-parameter FPT algorithm for embedded clustered graphs, when parameterized by the carving-width of the dual graph of the input. This is the first FPT algorithm for this long-standing open problem with respect to a single notable graph-width parameter. Moreover, in the general case, the polynomial dependency of our FPT algorithm is smaller than the one of the algorithm by Fulek and Tóth. To further strengthen the relevance of this result, we show that the C-Planarity Testing problem retains its computational complexity when parameterized by several other graph-width parameters, which may potentially lead to faster algorithms.

We define the crossing graph of a given embedded graph (such as a road network) to be a graph with a vertex for each edge of the embedding, with two crossing graph vertices adjacent when the corresponding two edges of the embedding cross each other. In this paper, we study the sparsity properties of crossing graphs of real-world road networks. We show that, in large road networks (the Urban Road Network Dataset), the crossing graphs have connected components that are primarily trees, and that the remaining non-tree components are typically sparse (technically, that they have bounded degeneracy). We prove theoretically that when an embedded graph has a sparse crossing graph, it has other desirable properties that lead to fast algorithms for shortest paths and other algorithms important in geographic information systems. Notably, these graphs have polynomial expansion, meaning that they and all their subgraphs have small separators.

We provide an efficient algorithm for determining how a road network has evolved over time, given two snapshot instances from different dates. To allow for such determinations across different databases and even against hand-drawn maps, we take a strictly topological approach in this paper, so that we compare road networks based strictly on graph-theoretic properties. Given two road networks of same region from two different dates, our approach allows one to match road network portions that remain intact and also point out added or removed portions. We analyze our algorithm both theoretically, showing that it runs in polynomial time for non-degenerate road networks even though a related problem is NP-complete, and experimentally, using dated road networks from the TIGER/Line archive of the U.S. Census Bureau.