VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Reem
dblp:45/7660
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3190-2720ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | The projector algorithm: A simple parallel algorithm for computing Voronoi diagrams and Delaunay graphs
Daniel Reem |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 1 |
| 2022 | A generalized block-iterative projection method for the common fixed point problem induced by cutters
Yair Censor, Daniel Reem, Maroun Zaknoon |
J. Glob. Optim. | 2 |
| 2018 | On the Computation of Zone and Double Zone Diagrams
Daniel Reem |
Discret. Comput. Geom. | 1 |
| 2011 | The geometric stability of voronoi diagrams with respect to small changes of the sitesabstractVoronoi diagrams appear in many areas in science and technology and have numerous applications. They have been the subject of extensive investigation during the last decades. Roughly speaking, they are a certain decomposition of a given space into cells, induced by a distance function and by a tuple of subsets called the generators or the sites. Consider the following question: does a small change of the sites, e.g., of their position or shape, yield a small change in the corresponding Voronoi cells? This question is by all means natural and fundamental, since in practice one approximates the sites either because of inexact information about them, because of inevitable numerical errors in their representation, for simplification purposes and so on, and it is important to know whether the resulting Voronoi cells approximate the real ones well. The traditional approach to Voronoi diagrams, and, in particular, to (variants of) this question, is combinatorial. However, it seems that there has been a very limited discussion in the geometric sense (the shape of the cells), mainly an intuitive one, without proofs, in Euclidean spaces. We formalize this question precisely, and then show that the answer is positive in the case of Rd, or, more generally, in (possibly infinite dimensional) uniformly convex normed spaces, assuming there is a common positive lower bound on the distance between the sites. Explicit bounds are given, and we allow infinitely many sites of a general form. The relevance of this result is illustrated using several pictures and many real-world and theoretical examples and counterexamples. Daniel Reem |
SCG | 1 |
| 2010 | Distance k-sectors existabstractThe bisector of two nonempty sets P and Q in a metric space is the set of all points with equal distance to P and to Q. A distance k-sector of P and Q, where k ≥ 2 is an integer, is a (k-1)-tuple (C1, C2, ..., Ck-1) such that Ci is the bisector of Ci-1 and Ci+1 for every i= 1, 2, ..., k-1, where C0 = P and Ck = Q. This notion, for the case where P and Q are points in Euclidean plane, was introduced by Asano, Matousek, and Tokuyama, motivated by a question of Murata in VLSI design. They established the existence and uniqueness of the distance trisector in this special case. We prove the existence of a distance k-sector for all k and for every two disjoint, nonempty, closed sets P and Q in Euclidean spaces of any (finite) dimension, or more generally, in proper geodesic spaces (uniqueness remains open). The core of the proof is a new notion of k-gradation for P and Q, whose existence (even in an arbitrary metric space) is proved using the Knaster-Tarski fixed point theorem, by a method introduced by Reem and Reich for a slightly different purpose. Keiko Imai, Akitoshi Kawamura, Jirí Matousek 0001, Daniel Reem, Takeshi Tokuyama |
SCG | 4 |
| 2010 | Distance k-sectors exist
Keiko Imai, Akitoshi Kawamura, Jirí Matousek 0001, Daniel Reem, Takeshi Tokuyama |
Comput. Geom. | 4 |