Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sergey Senkin
dblp:45/7704
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5848-005XORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment · Bioinform. 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
mutational signature analysis |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignment · Bioinform. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse regression · 0.7non-negative least squares · 0.7forward stagewise algorithm · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Assigning mutational signatures to individual samples and individual somatic mutations with SigProfilerAssignmentabstractMOTIVATION: Analysis of mutational signatures is a powerful approach for understanding the mutagenic processes that have shaped the evolution of a cancer genome. To evaluate the mutational signatures operative in a cancer genome, one first needs to quantify their activities by estimating the number of mutations imprinted by each signature. RESULTS: Here we present SigProfilerAssignment, a desktop and an online computational framework for assigning all types of mutational signatures to individual samples. SigProfilerAssignment is the first tool that allows both analysis of copy-number signatures and probabilistic assignment of signatures to individual somatic mutations. As its computational engine, the tool uses a custom implementation of the forward stagewise algorithm for sparse regression and nonnegative least squares for numerical optimization. Analysis of 2700 synthetic cancer genomes with and without noise demonstrates that SigProfilerAssignment outperforms four commonly used approaches for assigning mutational signatures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SigProfilerAssignment is available under the BSD 2-clause license at https://github.com/AlexandrovLab/SigProfilerAssignment with a web implementation at https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/signatures/assignment/. Marcos Díaz-Gay, Raviteja Vangara, Mark Barnes, Xi Wang 0042, S. M. Ashiqul Islam, Ian Vermes, Stephen Duke, Nithish Bharadhwaj Narasimman, Zichen Jiang, Sarah J. Moody, Sergey Senkin, Paul Brennan, Michael R. Stratton, Ludmil B. Alexandrov |
Bioinform. | 12 |
| 2021 | MSA: reproducible mutational signature attribution with confidence based on simulationsabstractBACKGROUND: Mutational signatures proved to be a useful tool for identifying patterns of mutations in genomes, often providing valuable insights about mutagenic processes or normal DNA damage. De novo extraction of signatures is commonly performed using Non-Negative Matrix Factorisation methods, however, accurate attribution of these signatures to individual samples is a distinct problem requiring uncertainty estimation, particularly in noisy scenarios or when the acting signatures have similar shapes. Whilst many packages for signature attribution exist, a few provide accuracy measures, and most are not easily reproducible nor scalable in high-performance computing environments. RESULTS: We present Mutational Signature Attribution (MSA), a reproducible pipeline designed to assign signatures of different mutation types on a single-sample basis, using Non-Negative Least Squares method with optimisation based on configurable simulations. Parametric bootstrap is proposed as a way to measure statistical uncertainties of signature attribution. Supported mutation types include single and doublet base substitutions, indels and structural variants. Results are validated using simulations with reference COSMIC signatures, as well as randomly generated signatures. CONCLUSIONS: MSA is a tool for optimised mutational signature attribution based on simulations, providing confidence intervals using parametric bootstrap. It comprises a set of Python scripts unified in a single Nextflow pipeline with containerisation for cross-platform reproducibility and scalability in high-performance computing environments. The tool is publicly available from https://gitlab.com/s.senkin/MSA . Sergey Senkin |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2008 | Situational Analysis with Analytical Support in Virtual Environment for Decision Making Process Under High-Risk and Crisis ConditionsabstractTraditional situational analysis of a problem (conflict) is bound in its opportunities due to difficulties related with risk valuation and changing character of subjective probabilities of possible alternatives and reflection ranks of main actors. This paper focuses on the usage of multi role virtual games as a platform for the situational analysis. Particularly, it studies the opportunity to use Second Life virtual world as a universal base for modeling diverse complex, emergency and high-risk situations. The results of the "Hostage-rescue" test modeling experiment are discussed. Reconstruction of the real historical event "Operation Entebbe" (hostage-taking in a plane followed by a rescue mission, took place in 1976) and scenarios of emerging worst-case situation in a manned spacecraft are developed as a direction for further studies. Yuri Baturin, Evgeny Dzyabura, Pavel Izhutov, Stanislav V. Klimenko, Alexander Ksenofontov, Ilya Purtov, Sergey Senkin, Alexandra Verzun |
CW | 7 |