Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Vyacheslav N. Grishin

dblp:46/1940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
model quality assessment
0.112011
An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction
0.112011
An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
model-based clustering
0.012002
Euclidian space and grouping of biological objects · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction › protein classification
protein sequence classification
0.012002
Euclidian space and grouping of biological objects · Bioinform. 2002
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein sequence analysis
0.012002
Euclidian space and grouping of biological objects · Bioinform. 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

superimposition-independent scoring · 0.1global distance test · 0.1multidimensional scaling · 0.0model-based clustering · 0.0density estimation · 0.0UPGMA · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 An automatic method for CASP9 free modeling structure prediction assessment
abstract
MOTIVATION: Manual inspection has been applied to and is well accepted for assessing critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP) free modeling (FM) category predictions over the years. Such manual assessment requires expertise and significant time investment, yet has the problems of being subjective and unable to differentiate models of similar quality. It is beneficial to incorporate the ideas behind manual inspection to an automatic score system, which could provide objective and reproducible assessment of structure models. RESULTS: Inspired by our experience in CASP9 FM category assessment, we developed an automatic superimposition independent method named Quality Control Score (QCS) for structure prediction assessment. QCS captures both global and local structural features, with emphasis on global topology. We applied this method to all FM targets from CASP9, and overall the results showed the best agreement with Manual Inspection Scores among automatic prediction assessment methods previously applied in CASPs, such as Global Distance Test Total Score (GDT_TS) and Contact Score (CS). As one of the important components to guide our assessment of CASP9 FM category predictions, this method correlates well with other scoring methods and yet is able to reveal good-quality models that are missed by GDT_TS. AVAILABILITY: The script for QCS calculation is available at http://prodata.swmed.edu/QCS/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Qian Cong, Lisa N. Kinch, Jimin Pei, Shuoyong Shi, Vyacheslav N. Grishin, Nick V. Grishin
Bioinform.5
2002 Euclidian space and grouping of biological objects
abstract
MOTIVATION: Biological objects tend to cluster into discrete groups. Objects within a group typically possess similar properties. It is important to have fast and efficient tools for grouping objects that result in biologically meaningful clusters. Protein sequences reflect biological diversity and offer an extraordinary variety of objects for polishing clustering strategies. Grouping of sequences should reflect their evolutionary history and their functional properties. Visualization of relationships between sequences is of no less importance. Tree-building methods are typically used for such visualization. An alternative concept to visualization is a multidimensional sequence space. In this space, proteins are defined as points and distances between the points reflect the relationships between the proteins. Such a space can also be a basis for model-based clustering strategies that typically produce results correlating better with biological properties of proteins. RESULTS: We developed an approach to classification of biological objects that combines evolutionary measures of their similarity with a model-based clustering procedure. We apply the methodology to amino acid sequences. On the first step, given a multiple sequence alignment, we estimate evolutionary distances between proteins measured in expected numbers of amino acid substitutions per site. These distances are additive and are suitable for evolutionary tree reconstruction. On the second step, we find the best fit approximation of the evolutionary distances by Euclidian distances and thus represent each protein by a point in a multidimensional space. The Euclidian space may be projected in two or three dimensions and the projections can be used to visualize relationships between proteins. On the third step, we find a non-parametric estimate of the probability density of the points and cluster the points that belong to the same local maximum of this density in a group. The number of groups is controlled by a sigma-parameter that determines the shape of the density estimate and the number of maxima in it. The grouping procedure outperforms commonly used methods such as UPGMA and single linkage clustering.
Vyacheslav N. Grishin, Nick V. Grishin
Bioinform.1