Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven P. Shwartz

dblp:46/1943 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data models and query languages · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › natural language interface
natural language database interface
0.011982
Problems With Domain-Independent Natural Language Database Access Systems · ACL 1982
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Problems With Domain-Independent Natural Language Database Access Systems
abstract
In the past decade, a number of natural language database access systems have been constructed (e.g. Hendrix 1976; Waltz et al. 1976; Sacerdoti 1978; Harris 1979; Lehnert and Shwartz 1982; Shwartz 1982). The level of performance achieved by natural language database access systems varies considerably, with the more robust systems operating within a narrow domain (i.e., content area) and relying heavily on domain-specific knowledge to guide the language understanding process. Transporting a system constructed for one domain into a new domain is extremely resource-intensive because a new set of domain-specific knowledge must be encoded.In order to reduce the cost of transportation, a great deal of current research has focussed on building natural language access systems that are domain-independent. More specifically, these systems attempt to use syntactic knowledge in conjunction with knowledge about the structure of the database as a substitute for conceptual knowledge regarding the database content area. In this paper I examine the issue of whether or not it is possible to build a natural language database access system that achieves an acceptable level of performance without including domain-specific conceptual knowledge.
Steven P. Shwartz
ACL1
1982 Natural Language Data Base Access With Pearl
Wendy G. Lehnert, Steven P. Shwartz
COLING2