VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zakria Hussain
dblp:46/288
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 72% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011 Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
sample compression |
0.2 | 2 | 2008 | Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008 Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel machines
kernel canonical correlation analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
sample compression bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
VC dimension bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008 |
Algorithms and data structures › kernel methods
kernel principal component analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008 |
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparse approximation |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › learning bounds
loss bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matching pursuit · 0.2VC theory · 0.2vapnik-chervonenkis bounds · 0.1rademacher complexity · 0.1orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.1kernel matching pursuit · 0.1sample compression schemes · 0.1sample compression scheme · 0.1sample compression bounds · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Manifold-preserving graph reduction for sparse semi-supervised learning
Shiliang Sun, Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor |
Neurocomputing | 2 |
| 2013 | Drug screening with Elastic-net multiple kernel learningabstractWe apply Elastic-net Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) to the MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR) database for the problem of drug screening. We show that combining a set of kernels constructed from fingerprint descriptors, can significantly improve the accuracy of prediction, against a Support Vector Machine trained on each kernel separately. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of MKL to the MDDR database for drug screening. Kitsuchart Pasupa, Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor, Peter Willett 0002 |
BIBE | 2 |
| 2011 | Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit AlgorithmsabstractWe derive generalization error (loss) bounds for orthogonal matching pursuit algorithms, starting with kernel matching pursuit and sparse kernel principal components analysis. We propose (to the best of our knowledge) the first loss bound for kernel matching pursuit using a novel application of sample compression and Vapnik-Chervonenkis bounds. For sparse kernel principal components analysis, we find that it can be bounded using a standard sample compression analysis, as the subspace it constructs is a compression scheme. We demonstrate empirically that this bound is tighter than previous state-of-the-art bounds for principal components analysis, which use global and local Rademacher complexities. From this analysis we propose a novel sparse variant of kernel canonical correlation analysis and bound its generalization performance using the results developed in this paper. We conclude with a general technique for designing matching pursuit algorithms for other learning domains. Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor, David R. Hardoon, Charanpal Dhanjal |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning relevant eye movement feature spaces across usersabstractIn this paper we predict the relevance of images based on a lowdimensional feature space found using several users' eye movements. Each user is given an image-based search task, during which their eye movements are extracted using a Tobii eye tracker. The users also provide us with explicit feedback regarding the relevance of images. We demonstrate that by using a greedy Nyström algorithm on the eye movement features of different users, we can find a suitable low-dimensional feature space for learning. We validate the suitability of this feature space by projecting the eye movement features of a new user into this space, training an online learning algorithm using these features, and showing that the number of mistakes (regret over time) made in predicting relevant images is lower than when using the original eye movement features. We also plot Recall-Precision and ROC curves, and use a sign test to verify the statistical significance of our results. Zakria Hussain, Kitsuchart Pasupa, John Shawe-Taylor |
ETRA | 1 |
| 2010 | Exploration-Exploitation of Eye Movement Enriched Multiple Feature Spaces for Content-Based Image Retrieval
Zakria Hussain, Alex Po Leung, Kitsuchart Pasupa, David R. Hardoon, Peter Auer, John Shawe-Taylor |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 1 |
| 2009 | Kernel Polytope Faces Pursuit
Tom Diethe, Zakria Hussain |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 2 |
| 2008 | Theory of matching pursuitabstractWe analyse matching pursuit for kernel principal components analysis by proving that the sparse subspace it produces is a sample compression scheme. We show that this bound is tighter than the KPCA bound of Shawe-Taylor et al swck-05 and highly predictive of the size of the subspace needed to capture most of the variance in the data. We analyse a second matching pursuit algorithm called kernel matching pursuit (KMP) which does not correspond to a sample compression scheme. However, we give a novel bound that views the choice of subspace of the KMP algorithm as a compression scheme and hence provide a VC bound to upper bound its future loss. Finally we describe how the same bound can be applied to other matching pursuit related algorithms. Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2007 | Using Generalization Error Bounds to Train the Set Covering Machine
Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor |
ICONIP (1) | 1 |
| 2007 | Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data
Zakria Hussain, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, John Shawe-Taylor, S. Charles Brubaker, Matthew D. Mullin |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |