Zakria Hussain

dblp:46/288 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Learning theory · 72% Representation and self-supervised learning · 13% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 13%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 50% Algorithms and data structures · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.222011
Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory
sample compression
0.222008
Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008
Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel machines
kernel canonical correlation analysis
0.112011
Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization bounds
sample compression bounds
0.112011
Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2011
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
VC dimension bounds
0.112008
Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008
Algorithms and data structures › kernel methods
kernel principal component analysis
0.112008
Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
sparse approximation
0.112008
Theory of matching pursuit · NIPS 2008
Machine learning › Learning theory › learning bounds
loss bounds
0.112007
Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance
0.012007
Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matching pursuit · 0.2VC theory · 0.2vapnik-chervonenkis bounds · 0.1rademacher complexity · 0.1orthogonal matching pursuit · 0.1kernel matching pursuit · 0.1sample compression schemes · 0.1sample compression scheme · 0.1sample compression bounds · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Manifold-preserving graph reduction for sparse semi-supervised learning
Shiliang Sun, Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor
Neurocomputing2
2013 Drug screening with Elastic-net multiple kernel learning
abstract
We apply Elastic-net Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL) to the MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR) database for the problem of drug screening. We show that combining a set of kernels constructed from fingerprint descriptors, can significantly improve the accuracy of prediction, against a Support Vector Machine trained on each kernel separately. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first application of MKL to the MDDR database for drug screening.
Kitsuchart Pasupa, Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor, Peter Willett 0002
BIBE2
2011 Design and Generalization Analysis of Orthogonal Matching Pursuit Algorithms
abstract
We derive generalization error (loss) bounds for orthogonal matching pursuit algorithms, starting with kernel matching pursuit and sparse kernel principal components analysis. We propose (to the best of our knowledge) the first loss bound for kernel matching pursuit using a novel application of sample compression and Vapnik-Chervonenkis bounds. For sparse kernel principal components analysis, we find that it can be bounded using a standard sample compression analysis, as the subspace it constructs is a compression scheme. We demonstrate empirically that this bound is tighter than previous state-of-the-art bounds for principal components analysis, which use global and local Rademacher complexities. From this analysis we propose a novel sparse variant of kernel canonical correlation analysis and bound its generalization performance using the results developed in this paper. We conclude with a general technique for designing matching pursuit algorithms for other learning domains.
Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor, David R. Hardoon, Charanpal Dhanjal
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2010 Learning relevant eye movement feature spaces across users
abstract
In this paper we predict the relevance of images based on a lowdimensional feature space found using several users' eye movements. Each user is given an image-based search task, during which their eye movements are extracted using a Tobii eye tracker. The users also provide us with explicit feedback regarding the relevance of images. We demonstrate that by using a greedy Nyström algorithm on the eye movement features of different users, we can find a suitable low-dimensional feature space for learning. We validate the suitability of this feature space by projecting the eye movement features of a new user into this space, training an online learning algorithm using these features, and showing that the number of mistakes (regret over time) made in predicting relevant images is lower than when using the original eye movement features. We also plot Recall-Precision and ROC curves, and use a sign test to verify the statistical significance of our results.
Zakria Hussain, Kitsuchart Pasupa, John Shawe-Taylor
ETRA1
2010 Exploration-Exploitation of Eye Movement Enriched Multiple Feature Spaces for Content-Based Image Retrieval
Zakria Hussain, Alex Po Leung, Kitsuchart Pasupa, David R. Hardoon, Peter Auer, John Shawe-Taylor
ECML/PKDD (1)1
2009 Kernel Polytope Faces Pursuit
Tom Diethe, Zakria Hussain
ECML/PKDD (1)2
2008 Theory of matching pursuit
abstract
We analyse matching pursuit for kernel principal components analysis by proving that the sparse subspace it produces is a sample compression scheme. We show that this bound is tighter than the KPCA bound of Shawe-Taylor et al swck-05 and highly predictive of the size of the subspace needed to capture most of the variance in the data. We analyse a second matching pursuit algorithm called kernel matching pursuit (KMP) which does not correspond to a sample compression scheme. However, we give a novel bound that views the choice of subspace of the KMP algorithm as a compression scheme and hence provide a VC bound to upper bound its future loss. Finally we describe how the same bound can be applied to other matching pursuit related algorithms.
Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor
NIPS1
2007 Using Generalization Error Bounds to Train the Set Covering Machine
Zakria Hussain, John Shawe-Taylor
ICONIP (1)1
2007 Revised Loss Bounds for the Set Covering Machine and Sample-Compression Loss Bounds for Imbalanced Data
Zakria Hussain, François Laviolette, Mario Marchand, John Shawe-Taylor, S. Charles Brubaker, Matthew D. Mullin
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1