Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samir Ayachi

dblp:46/4233 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 67% Parallel and multicore computing · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
processor scheduling
0.011999
Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling
0.011999
Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999
Parallel and multicore computing › multiprocessor system
shared-memory multiprocessor
0.011999
Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1999 Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems
abstract
Processor scheduling policies for multiprocessor systems can be broadly divided into space-sharing and time-sharing policies. Space-sharing policies divide the system processors into a number of partitions and each partition is exclusively allocated to a single job. In time-sharing policies, processors are temporally shared by jobs. Several space-sharing and time-sharing policies have been proposed for small-scale shared-memory systems and require a central run queue and/or central scheduler. The central queue scheduler poses serious scalability problems for large-scale multiprocessor systems. Furthermore, space-sharing and time-sharing policies have their advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we propose a new multiprocessor scheduling policy that eliminates contention for the central queue/scheduler. Our hierarchical scheduling policy (HSP) is a self-scheduling policy and uses a hierarchical run queue organization to facilitate processor allocation to jobs. We show that the HSP policy is considerably better than purely space-sharing and purely time-sharing policies over a wide range of system and workload parameters of interest.
Sivarama P. Dandamudi, Samir Ayachi
IEEE Trans. Computers2