Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Samir Ayachi
dblp:46/4233
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1999
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 67% Parallel and multicore computing · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis › scheduling
processor scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999 |
Electronic design automation › high-level synthesis
scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999 |
Parallel and multicore computing › multiprocessor system
shared-memory multiprocessor |
0.0 | 1 | 1999 | Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Systems · IEEE Trans. Computers 1999 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0queueing analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1999 | Performance of Hierarchical Processor Scheduling in Shared-Memory Multiprocessor SystemsabstractProcessor scheduling policies for multiprocessor systems can be broadly divided into space-sharing and time-sharing policies. Space-sharing policies divide the system processors into a number of partitions and each partition is exclusively allocated to a single job. In time-sharing policies, processors are temporally shared by jobs. Several space-sharing and time-sharing policies have been proposed for small-scale shared-memory systems and require a central run queue and/or central scheduler. The central queue scheduler poses serious scalability problems for large-scale multiprocessor systems. Furthermore, space-sharing and time-sharing policies have their advantages and disadvantages. In this paper, we propose a new multiprocessor scheduling policy that eliminates contention for the central queue/scheduler. Our hierarchical scheduling policy (HSP) is a self-scheduling policy and uses a hierarchical run queue organization to facilitate processor allocation to jobs. We show that the HSP policy is considerably better than purely space-sharing and purely time-sharing policies over a wide range of system and workload parameters of interest. Sivarama P. Dandamudi, Samir Ayachi |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |