Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Terry Baker

dblp:46/4778 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics › molecular modeling › molecular docking
antibody-antigen docking
0.212014
Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody-antigen docking · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › immunoinformatics
epitope prediction
0.212014
Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody-antigen docking · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
protein-protein docking
0.212014
Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody-antigen docking · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology
structural bioinformatics
0.212014
Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody-antigen docking · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rigid-body docking · 0.2rescoring · 0.2conformational matching · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2014 Improving B-cell epitope prediction and its application to global antibody-antigen docking
abstract
MOTIVATION: Antibodies are currently the most important class of biopharmaceuticals. Development of such antibody-based drugs depends on costly and time-consuming screening campaigns. Computational techniques such as antibody-antigen docking hold the potential to facilitate the screening process by rapidly providing a list of initial poses that approximate the native complex. RESULTS: We have developed a new method to identify the epitope region on the antigen, given the structures of the antibody and the antigen-EpiPred. The method combines conformational matching of the antibody-antigen structures and a specific antibody-antigen score. We have tested the method on both a large non-redundant set of antibody-antigen complexes and on homology models of the antibodies and/or the unbound antigen structure. On a non-redundant test set, our epitope prediction method achieves 44% recall at 14% precision against 23% recall at 14% precision for a background random distribution. We use our epitope predictions to rescore the global docking results of two rigid-body docking algorithms: ZDOCK and ClusPro. In both cases including our epitope, prediction increases the number of near-native poses found among the top decoys. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our software is available from http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/research/proteins/resources.
Konrad Krawczyk, Terry Baker, Jiye Shi, Charlotte M. Deane
Bioinform.3
1995 Modelling Spatially and Temporally Distributed Phenomena: New Methods and Tools for GRASS GIS
abstract
The concept of GRASS (Geographic Resources Analysis Support System) as an open system has created a favourable environment for integration of process based modelling and GIS. To support this integration a new generation of tools is being developed in the following areas: (a) interpolation from multidimensional scattered point data, (b) analysis of surfaces and hypersurfaces, (c) modelling of spatial processes and, (d) 3D dynamic visualization. Examples of two applications are given-spatial and temporal modelling of erosion and deposition, and multivariate interpolation and visualization of nitrogen concentrations in the Chesapeake Bay.
Helena Mitásová, Lubos Mitas, William M. Brown, David P. Gerdes, Irina Kosinovsky, Terry Baker
Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci.6