Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arun Sen

dblp:47/183 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
30ranked-venue papers
16as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-6145-9603ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 13 · 8 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 8 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 6 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Software maintenance and evolution · 52% Requirements engineering and software design · 41% Empirical software engineering · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning
data warehouse
0.112012
A Model of Data Warehousing Process Maturity · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2012
Software maintenance and evolution › software process improvement
software process maturity
0.012012
A Model of Data Warehousing Process Maturity · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2012
Requirements engineering and software design › software design
design reuse
0.011997
The Role of Opportunism in the Software Design Reuse Process · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997
Requirements engineering and software design
design cognition
0.011997
The Role of Opportunism in the Software Design Reuse Process · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997
Empirical software engineering
developer studies
0.011997
The Role of Opportunism in the Software Design Reuse Process · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

maturity model · 0.3expert evaluation · 0.3protocol analysis · 0.0cognitive model · 0.0blackboard technology · 0.0operationalization · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Developing A Decision Support System for Healthcare Practices: A Design Science Research Approach
Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
Data Knowl. Eng.1
2022 Customer-initiated and firm-initiated online shopping visits under competition for attention: A conceptual model and empirical analysis
Amit Bhatnagar, Prabuddha De, Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
Decis. Support Syst.3
2019 Emergence of DSS efforts in genomics: Past contributions and challenges
Arun Sen, Ahmad Al Kawam, Aniruddha Datta
Decis. Support Syst.1
2018 Understanding the Bioinformatics Challenges of Integrating Genomics Into Healthcare
abstract
Genomic data is paving the way towards personalized healthcare. By unveiling genetic disease-contributing factors, genomic data can aid in the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of a wide range of complex diseases. Integrating genomic data into healthcare is riddled with a wide range of challenges spanning social, ethical, legal, educational, economic, and technical aspects. Bioinformatics is a core integration aspect presenting an overwhelming number of unaddressed challenges. In this paper we tackle the fundamental bioinformatics integration concerns including: genomic data generation, storage, representation, and utilization in conjunction with clinical data. We divide the bioinformatics challenges into a series of seven intertwined integration aspects spanning the areas of informatics, knowledge management, and communication. For each aspect, we provide a detailed discussion of the current research directions, outstanding challenges, and possible resolutions. This paper seeks to help narrow the gap between the genomic applications, which are being predominantly utilized in research settings, and the clinical adoption of these applications.
Ahmad Al Kawam, Arun Sen, Aniruddha Datta, Nancy Dickey
IEEE J. Biomed. Health Informatics2
2017 Predicting the helpfulness of online reviews using a scripts-enriched text regression model
Thomas L. Ngo-Ye, Atish P. Sinha, Arun Sen
Expert Syst. Appl.3
2016 An ontological model of the practice transformation process
Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
J. Biomed. Informatics1
2012 Clinical decision support: Converging toward an integrated architecture
Arun Sen, Amarnath Banerjee, Atish P. Sinha, Manish Bansal
J. Biomed. Informatics1
2012 A Model of Data Warehousing Process Maturity
abstract
Even though data warehousing (DW) requires huge investments, the data warehouse market is experiencing incredible growth. However, a large number of DW initiatives end up as failures. In this paper, we argue that the maturity of a data warehousing process (DWP) could significantly mitigate such large-scale failures and ensure the delivery of consistent, high quality, “single-version of truth” data in a timely manner. However, unlike software development, the assessment of DWP maturity has not yet been tackled in a systematic way. In light of the critical importance of data as a corporate resource, we believe that the need for a maturity model for DWP could not be greater. In this paper, we describe the design and development of a five-level DWP maturity model (DWP-M) over a period of three years. A unique aspect of this model is that it covers processes in both data warehouse development and operations. Over 20 key DW executives from 13 different corporations were involved in the model development process. The final model was evaluated by a panel of experts; the results strongly validate the functionality, productivity, and usability of the model. We present the initial and final DWP-M model versions, along with illustrations of several key process areas at different levels of maturity.
Arun Sen, Keshavamurthy Ramamurthy, Atish P. Sinha
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
2011 IT alignment strategies for customer relationship management
Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
Decis. Support Syst.1
2008 An empirical investigation of the key determinants of data warehouse adoption
Keshavamurthy Ramamurthy, Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
Decis. Support Syst.2
2008 Data Warehousing Infusion and Organizational Effectiveness
abstract
Data warehousing (DW) has emerged as one of the most powerful technology innovations in recent years to support organization-wide decision making and has become a key component in the information technology (IT) infrastructure. Proponents of DW claim that its infusion can dramatically enhance the ability of businesses to improve the access, distribution, and sharing of information and provide managerial decision support for complex business questions. DW is also an enabling technology for data mining, customer-relationship management, and other business-intelligence applications. Although data warehouses have been around for quite some time, they have been plagued by high failure rates and limited spread or use. Drawing upon past research on the adoption and diffusion of innovations and on the implementation of information systems (IS), we examine the key organizational and innovation factors that influence the infusion (diffusion) of DW within organizations and also examine if more extensive infusion leads to improved organizational outcomes. In this paper, we conducted a field study, where two senior managers (one from IS and the other from a line function) from 117 companies participated, and developed a structural model to test the research hypotheses. The results indicate that four of the seven variables examined in this paper-organizational support, quality of the project management process, compatibility, and complexity-significantly influence the degree of infusion of DW and that the infusion, in turn, significantly influences organization-level benefits and stakeholder satisfaction. The findings of this paper have interesting implications for both research and practice in IT and DW infusion, as well as in the organization-level impact of the infusion of enterprise-wide infrastructural and decision support technologies such as DW.
Keshavamurthy Ramamurthy, Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A2
2007 Toward Developing Data Warehousing Process Standards: An Ontology-Based Review of Existing Methodologies
abstract
A data warehouse is developed using a data warehousing process (DWP) methodology. Currently, there are a large number of methodologies available in the data warehousing market. The reason for this is the lack of any centralized attempts at creating platform-independent DWP standards. For the development of such standards, it is very important that we first examine the current practices being followed by the data warehousing industry. In this study, we review 30 commercial data warehousing methodologies and analyze the standard practices they have adopted with respect to DWP. To perform the analysis, we first develop an ontological model of DWP based on a thorough review of the literature and inputs from experts in the data warehousing field. The ontological model consists of two hierarchies: a composition hierarchy which shows the decomposition of DWP tasks such as system development, extract, transform, and load (ETL), and end-user application design; and a classification hierarchy which specifies the alternative methods or techniques available for performing the tasks. We next apply hierarchical cluster analysis to group the methodologies that share a common set of standards. Our study provides valuable insights into the prevailing standard practices for different DWP tasks-system development, requirements analysis, architecture design, data modeling, ETL, data extraction, and end-user application design-and identifies important directions for future research on DWP standardization
Arun Sen, Atish P. Sinha
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C1
2004 Metadata management: past, present and future
Arun Sen
Decis. Support Syst.1
1997 The Role of Opportunism in the Software Design Reuse Process
abstract
Software design involves translating a set of task requirements into a structured description of a computer program that will perform the task. A software designer can use design schema, collaborative design knowledge, or can reuse design artifacts. Very little has been done to include reuse of design artifacts in the software development life cycle, despite tremendous promises of reuse. As a result, this technique has not seen widespread use, possibly due to a lack of cognitive understanding of the reuse process. This research explores the role of a specific cognitive aspect, opportunism, in demand-side software reuse. We propose a cognitive model based on opportunism that describes the software design process with reuse. Protocol analysis verifies that the software design with reuse is indeed opportunistic and reveals that some software designers employ certain tasks of the reuse process frequently. Based on these findings, we propose a reuse support system that incorporates blackboard technology and existing reuse library management system.
Arun Sen
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1996 Introduction: DSS on model formulation
Arun Sen, Ajay S. Vinze
Decis. Support Syst.1
1996 Use of cognitive process modeling in knowledge base systems integration
Ravi C. Vellore, Arun Sen, Ajay S. Vinze
Decis. Support Syst.2
1995 Formalization of an IS-A based Extended Nested Relation Data Model
Santosh S. Venkatraman, Arun Sen
Inf. Syst.2
1993 Operationalizing the Opportunistic Behavior in Model Formulation
Ajay S. Vinze, Arun Sen, Shue Feng T. Liou
Int. J. Man Mach. Stud.2
1992 Construction of a model formulation consultant: the AEROBA experience
abstract
Typically, most of the current decision support systems (DSSs) do not possess a module to help users formulate mathematical programming models. This observation has led researchers to offer different approaches to the design of formulation consultants. Generally, these approaches emphasize the automation of formulation tasks with a predetermined (static) control or guidance strategy. A new approach to constructing a formulation consultant that emphasizes dynamic formulation control, opportunistic control, is offered. A system, AEROBA, has been developed using a blackboard architecture to provide support to the formulation process. Several of the issues raised regarding model formulation, opportunistic control, and blackboard systems are addressed using the AEROBA implementation. The contributions of this research are: (1) understanding the process of model formulation; (2) addressing the concerns of model formulation in attempting to automate the process; and (3) using the blackboard paradigm to deal with the unique characteristics of the model formulation process.>
Arun Sen, Ajay S. Vinze, Shue Feng T. Liou
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.1
1992 Epistemological aspects of object schemes
abstract
There is an increasing demand for database management systems to support nontraditional applications, such as computer aided design (CAD) and decision support systems (DSSs), which deal with complex objects. Complex objects are objects that have nonatomic components (unlike the traditional relational model). Many researchers have designed object systems to support complex objects. Five levels of scheme representations are identified: (1) record-structure level (lowest), (2) relational level, (3) logical level, (4) semantic level, and (5) object level (highest). Different object schemes proposed in the literature differ in their levels of representation. The authors discuss the need for a formalism for the object level of representation and describe a formalism for an object scheme called NEXUS.>
Santosh S. Venkatraman, Arun Sen
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.2
1991 Expert assistance for the decision support process using hierarchical planning
abstract
A decision support process (DSP), defined as an approach to decision support, uses a programming environment to aid the decision-maker. The DSP is discussed and a system architecture using a hierarchical planning approach to support DSP activities is proposed. These stages include problem solving, solution planning, tools integration, and model execution. A comparative study of DSP research with respect to these stages is made. Using a conceptual framework for DSP as the basis for proposing a system architecture for assisting DSP, the design and development concerns based on hierarchical planning and an attribute-based approach are outlined, and the system, called XDSP (expert decision support process), is described.>
Ajay S. Vinze, Arun Sen
IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.2
1990 Deductive data modeling: A new trend in database management for decision support systems
Arun Sen, Joobin Choobineh
Decis. Support Syst.1
1988 An expert decision support system for production control
Gautam Biswas, Michael Oliff, Arun Sen
Decis. Support Syst.3
1987 Enterprise Modeling for Database Specification and Design
Arun Sen, Larry Kerschberg
Data Knowl. Eng.1
1986 Schema translation: A three-level Semantic abstraction approach
Arun Sen, Chee Ching
Inf. Syst.1
1985 Decision support systems: An expert systems approach
Arun Sen, Gautam Biswas
Decis. Support Syst.1
1984 The evolution of a distributed processing network
Lori S. Franz, Arun Sen, Terry R. Rakes
Inf. Manag.2
1982 Logical data base design: A management-oriented approach
Arun Sen
Inf. Manag.1
1982 A new model for data base abstraction
Prabuddha De, Arun Sen, Ehud Gudes
Inf. Syst.2
1981 An Extended Entity-Relationship Model with Multi Level External Views
Prabuddha De, Arun Sen, Ehud Gudes
ER2