Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michiel M. Ligthart

dblp:47/2225 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.021991
A fault model for PLAs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Design-for-testability of PLA's using statistical cooling · DAC 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
fault modeling
0.011991
A fault model for PLAs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
design for testability
0.011986
Design-for-testability of PLA's using statistical cooling · DAC 1986
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
logic minimization
0.011986
Design-for-testability of PLA's using statistical cooling · DAC 1986
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.011986
Design-for-testability of PLA's using statistical cooling · DAC 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › VLSI testing
programmable logic array testing
0.011986
Design-for-testability of PLA's using statistical cooling · DAC 1986
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault modeling
bridging fault
0.011991
A fault model for PLAs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fault equivalence analysis · 0.0statistical cooling · 0.0simulated annealing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 High-level design for asynchronous logic
abstract
Asynchronous, self-timed, logic is often eschewed in digital design because of its ad-hoc methodologies and lack of available design tools. This paper describes a complete High Level Design flow for asynchronous circuits based on Register Transfer Level (RTL) VHDL using commercial simulation and synthesis tools. Contrary to previous asynchronous approaches, the proposed RTL methodology closely resembles familiar synchronous design styles.
Ross Smith 0003, Michiel M. Ligthart
ASP-DAC2
1991 A fault model for PLAs
abstract
A fault model for programmable logic arrays (PLAs) is discussed. This model maps realistic failures on four classes of faults: multiple stuck-at faults, multiple bridging faults, multiple crosspoint faults, and faults due to breaks in lines. It is shown that multiple stuck-at faults are equivalent to multiple crosspoint faults, multiple bridging faults are sub-equivalent to multiple crosspoint faults, and the set of patterns detecting multiple crosspoint faults is a subset of the set of patterns detecting multiple bridging faults. Hence, the set of patterns detecting multiple crosspoint faults also detects all multiple stuck-at faults and multiple bridging faults. This reduces the fault model for PLAs to two classes: multiple missing/extra crosspoint faults and multiple breaks.>
Michiel M. Ligthart, Rudi J. Stans
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1
1986 Design-for-testability of PLA's using statistical cooling
abstract
A method for designing easily testable PLA's with low overhead is presented. The method is based on a reduction of product lines and the addition of a small number of inputs. The required additional hardware is calculated using a statistical cooling algorithm. The presented design-for-testability method guarantees a 100 percent fault coverage with respect to multiple stuck-at faults and multiple missing/extra crosspoint faults.
Michiel M. Ligthart, Emile H. L. Aarts, Frans P. M. Beenker
DAC1