Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jianwei Li 0004

dblp:47/2372-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial robustness of language models
0.712023
Towards Robust Pruning: An Adaptive Knowledge-Retention Pruning Strategy for Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.712023
Towards Robust Pruning: An Adaptive Knowledge-Retention Pruning Strategy for Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning
0.712023
Towards Robust Pruning: An Adaptive Knowledge-Retention Pruning Strategy for Language Models · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Towards Robust Pruning: An Adaptive Knowledge-Retention Pruning Strategy for Language Models · EMNLP 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

post-training pruning · 0.7knowledge retention · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Towards Robust Pruning: An Adaptive Knowledge-Retention Pruning Strategy for Language Models
abstract
The pruning objective has recently extended beyond accuracy and sparsity to robustness in language models.Despite this, existing methods struggle to enhance robustness against adversarial attacks when continually increasing model sparsity and require a retraining process.As humans step into the era of large language models, these issues become increasingly prominent.This paper proposes that the robustness of language models is proportional to the extent of pre-trained knowledge they encompass.Accordingly, we introduce a post-training pruning strategy designed to faithfully replicate the embedding space and feature space of dense language models, aiming to conserve more pretrained knowledge during the pruning process.In this setup, each layer's reconstruction error not only originates from itself but also includes cumulative error from preceding layers, followed by an adaptive rectification.Compared to other state-of-art baselines, our approach demonstrates a superior balance between accuracy, sparsity, robustness, and pruning cost with BERT on datasets SST2, IMDB, and AG-News, marking a significant stride towards robust pruning in language models.
Jianwei Li 0004, Wei Cheng 0002, Dongkuan Xu
EMNLP1