The trend of increasing speed and complexity in the single-core processor as stated in the Moore's law is facing practical challenges. As a result, the multi-core processor architecture has emerged as the dominant architecture for both desktop and high-performance systems. Multi-core systems introduce many challenges that need to be addressed to achieve the best performance. Therefore, a new set of benchmarking techniques to study the impacts of the multi-core technologies is necessary. In this paper, multi-core specific performance metrics for cache coherency and memory bandwidth/latency/contention are investigated. This study also proposes a new benchmarking suite which includes cases extended from the high performance computing challenge (HPCC) benchmark suite. Performance results are measured on a Sun Fire T1000 server with six cores and an AMD Opteron dual core system. Experimental analysis and observations in this paper provide for a better understanding of the emerging multi-core architectures.

Co-array Fortran (CAF) and Unified Parallel C (UPC) are two emerging languages for single-program, multiple-data global address space programming. These languages boost programmer productivity by providing shared variables for inter-process communication instead of message passing. However, the performance of these emerging languages still has room for improvement. In this paper, we study the performance of variants of the NAS MG, CG, SP, and BT benchmarks on several modern architectures to identify challenges that must be met to deliver top performance. We compare CAF and UPC variants of these programs with the original Fortran+MPI code. Today, CAF and UPC programs deliver scalable performance on clusters only when written to use bulk communication. However, our experiments uncovered some significant performance bottlenecks of UPC codes on all platforms. We account for the root causes limiting UPC performance such as the synchronization model, the communication efficiency of strided data, and source-to-source translation issues. We show that they can be remedied with language extensions, new synchronization constructs, and, finally, adequate optimizations by the back-end C compilers.

Summary form only given. Parallel programming paradigms, over the past decade, have focused on how to harness the computational power of contemporary parallel machines. Ease of use and code development productivity, has been a secondary goal. Recently, however, there has been a growing interest in understanding the code development productivity issues and their implications for the overall time-to-solution. Unified Parallel C (UPC) is a recently developed language which has been gaining rising attention. UPC holds the promise of leveraging the ease of use of the shared memory model and the performance benefit of locality exploitation. The performance potential for UPC has been extensively studied in recent research efforts. The aim of this study, however, is to examine the impact of UPC on programmer productivity. We propose several productivity metrics and consider a wide array of high performance applications. Further, we compare UPC to the most widely used parallel programming paradigm, MPI. The results show that UPC compares favorably with MPI in programmers productivity.