Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Huizhen Yu

dblp:47/3140 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
8as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 8 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Reinforcement learning · 88% Optimization for machine learning · 12%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
temporal difference learning
0.942018
On Generalized Bellman Equations and Temporal-Difference Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Weak Convergence Properties of Constrained Emphatic Temporal-difference Learning with Constant and Slowly Diminishing Stepsize · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learning · COLT 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bellman equation
0.312018
On Generalized Bellman Equations and Temporal-Difference Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › temporal difference learning
off-policy TD learning
0.312018
On Generalized Bellman Equations and Temporal-Difference Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis
0.322016
Weak Convergence Properties of Constrained Emphatic Temporal-difference Learning with Constant and Slowly Diminishing Stepsize · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learning · COLT 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning
0.212016
Weak Convergence Properties of Constrained Emphatic Temporal-difference Learning with Constant and Slowly Diminishing Stepsize · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation
0.212015
On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learning · COLT 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › temporal difference learning
least-squares temporal difference
0.112010
Convergence of Least Squares Temporal Difference Methods Under General Conditions · ICML 2010
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.112015
On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learning · COLT 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stochastic approximation · 0.6markov chain theory · 0.3eligibility traces · 0.3weak convergence methods · 0.2linear function approximation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From noise synthesis to noise removal: non-blind self-supervised Cherenkov video denoising for quantitative verification of radiotherapy
Huizhen Yu, Boshuai Sun, Guangli Liang, Yining Yang, Linrui Gao, Mengyu Jia
Expert Syst. Appl.1
2026 Quasi-multimodal-based pathophysiological feature learning for retinal disease diagnosis
Huizhen Yu, Fu Gui, Yatu Guo, Mengyu Jia
Medical Image Anal.2
2018 On Generalized Bellman Equations and Temporal-Difference Learning
abstract
We consider off-policy temporal-difference (TD) learning in discounted Markov decision processes, where the goal is to evaluate a policy in a model-free way by using observations of a state process generated without executing the policy. To curb the high variance issue in off-policy TD learning, we propose a new scheme of setting the $\lambda$-parameters of TD, based on generalized Bellman equations. Our scheme is to set $\lambda$ according to the eligibility trace iterates calculated in TD, thereby easily keeping these traces in a desired bounded range. Compared with prior work, this scheme is more direct and flexible, and allows much larger $\lambda$ values for off-policy TD learning with bounded traces. As to its soundness, using Markov chain theory, we prove the ergodicity of the joint state-trace process under nonrestrictive conditions, and we show that associated with our scheme is a generalized Bellman equation (for the policy to be evaluated) that depends on both the evolution of $\lambda$ and the unique invariant probability measure of the state-trace process. These results not only lead immediately to a characterization of the convergence behavior of least-squares based implementation of our scheme, but also prepare the ground for further analysis of gradient-based implementations.
Huizhen Yu, A. Rupam Mahmood, Richard S. Sutton
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2016 Weak Convergence Properties of Constrained Emphatic Temporal-difference Learning with Constant and Slowly Diminishing Stepsize
abstract
We consider the emphatic temporal-difference (TD) algorithm, ETD($\lambda$), for learning the value functions of stationary policies in a discounted, finite state and action Markov decision process. The ETD($\lambda$) algorithm was recently proposed by Sutton, Mahmood, and White (2016) to solve a long-standing divergence problem of the standard TD algorithm when it is applied to off- policy training, where data from an exploratory policy are used to evaluate other policies of interest. The almost sure convergence of ETD($\lambda$) has been proved in our recent work under general off-policy training conditions, but for a narrow range of diminishing stepsize. In this paper we present convergence results for constrained versions of ETD($\lambda$) with constant stepsize and with diminishing stepsize from a broad range. Our results characterize the asymptotic behavior of the trajectory of iterates produced by those algorithms, and are derived by combining key properties of ETD($\lambda$) with powerful convergence theorems from the weak convergence methods in stochastic approximation theory. For the case of constant stepsize, in addition to analyzing the behavior of the algorithms in the limit as the stepsize parameter approaches zero, we also analyze their behavior for a fixed stepsize and bound the deviations of their averaged iterates from the desired solution. These results are obtained by exploiting the weak Feller property of the Markov chains associated with the algorithms, and by using ergodic theorems for weak Feller Markov chains, in conjunction with the convergence results we get from the weak convergence methods. Besides ETD($\lambda$), our analysis also applies to the off-policy TD($\lambda$) algorithm, when the divergence issue is avoided by setting $\lambda$ sufficiently large. It yields, for that case, new results on the asymptotic convergence properties of constrained off-policy TD($\lambda$) with constant or slowly diminishing stepsize.
Huizhen Yu
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2015 On Convergence of Emphatic Temporal-Difference Learning
abstract
We consider emphatic temporal-difference learning algorithms for policy evaluation in discounted Markov decision processes with finite spaces. Such algorithms were recently proposed by Sutton, Mahmood, and White (2015) as an improved solution to the problem of divergence of off-policy temporal-difference learning with linear function approximation. We present in this paper the first convergence proofs for two emphatic algorithms, ETD(λ) and ELSTD(λ). We prove, under general off-policy conditions, the convergence in L^1 for ELSTD(λ) iterates, and the almost sure convergence of the approximate value functions calculated by both algorithms using a single infinitely long trajectory. Our analysis involves new techniques with applications beyond emphatic algorithms leading, for example, to the first proof that standard TD(λ) also converges under off-policy training for λsufficiently large.
Huizhen Yu
COLT1
2010 Convergence of Least Squares Temporal Difference Methods Under General Conditions
Huizhen Yu
ICML1
2009 Basis function adaptation methods for cost approximation in MDP
abstract
We generalize a basis adaptation method for cost approximation in Markov decision processes (MDP), extending earlier work of Menache, Mannor, and Shimkin. In our context, basis functions are parametrized and their parameters are tuned by minimizing an objective function involving the cost function approximation obtained when a temporal differences (TD) or other method is used. The adaptation scheme involves only low order calculations and can be implemented in a way analogous to policy gradient methods. In the generalized basis adaptation framework we provide extensions to TD methods for nonlinear optimal stopping problems and to alternative cost approximations beyond those based on TD.
Huizhen Yu, Dimitri P. Bertsekas
ADPRL1
2005 A Function Approximation Approach to Estimation of Policy Gradient for POMDP with Structured Policies
Huizhen Yu
UAI1
2004 Discretized Approximations for POMDP with Average Cost
Huizhen Yu, Dimitri P. Bertsekas
UAI1