Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bogdan Marinoiu

dblp:47/6488 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data stream processing · 35% Data models and query languages · 30% Database theory · 17%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Services computing and microservices · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Database theory
query satisfiability
0.112009
Satisfiability and relevance for queries over active documents · PODS 2009
Data stream processing
continuous query processing
0.112008
Distributed Monitoring of Peer-to-Peer Systems · ICDE 2008
Data stream processing
distributed stream processing
0.112008
Distributed Monitoring of Peer-to-Peer Systems · ICDE 2008
Distributed systems › observability
distributed monitoring
0.112008
Distributed Monitoring of Peer-to-Peer Systems · ICDE 2008
Distributed systems
peer-to-peer systems
0.112008
Distributed Monitoring of Peer-to-Peer Systems · ICDE 2008
Data models and query languages
XML
0.012010
AXART - Enabling Collaborative Work with AXML Artifacts · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2010
Data stream processing
update stream
0.012009
Satisfiability and relevance for queries over active documents · PODS 2009
Data models and query languages
XML data management
0.012008
Distributed Monitoring of Peer-to-Peer Systems · ICDE 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

view maintenance · 0.2access control · 0.2stream algebra · 0.2ActiveXML · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 AXART - Enabling Collaborative Work with AXML Artifacts
abstract
The workflow models have been essentially operation-centric for many years, ignoring almost completely the data aspects. Recently, a new paradigm of data-centric workflows, called business artifacts , has been introduced by Nigam and Caswell. We follow this approach and propose a model where artifacts are XML documents that evolve in time due to interactions with their environment, i.e. human users or Web services. This paper proposes the AXART system as a distributed platform for collaborative work that harnesses the power of our model. We will illustrate AXART with an example taken from the movie industry. Indeed, applying for a role in a film is a typical collaborative process that involves various participants, inside and outside the film company. The demonstration scenario considers both standard workflow process and dynamic workflow modifications, based on two extension mechanisms: workflow specialization and workflow exception. The workflows, modeled using artifacts, are supported by the AXART system by combining techniques specific to active documents, like view maintenance, with security techniques to manage access rights.
Bogdan Marinoiu, Serge Abiteboul, Pierre Bourhis, Alban Galland
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2009 Efficient maintenance techniques for views over active documents
abstract
Many Web applications are based on dynamic interactions between Web components exchanging flows of information. Such a situation arises for instance in mashup systems or when monitoring distributed autonomous systems. Our work is in this challenging context that has generated recently a lot of attention; see Web 2.0. We introduce the axlog formal model for capturing such interactions and show how this model can be supported efficiently. The central component is the axlog widget defined by one tree-pattern query or more, over an active document (in the Active XML style) that includes some input streams of updates. A widget generates a stream of updates for each query, the updates that are needed to maintain the view corresponding to the query. We exploit an array of known technologies: datalog optimization techniques such as Differential or MagicSet, constraint query languages, and efficient XML filtering (YFilter). The novel optimization technique we propose is based on fundamental new notions: a relevance (different than that of MagicSet), satisfiability and provenance for active documents. We briefly discuss an implementation of an axlog engine, an application that we used to test the approach, and results of experiments.
Serge Abiteboul, Pierre Bourhis, Bogdan Marinoiu
EDBT3
2009 Satisfiability and relevance for queries over active documents
abstract
ManyWeb applications are based on dynamic interactions between Web components exchanging flows of information. Such a situation arises for instance in mashup systems [22] or when monitoring distributed autonomous systems [6]. This is a challenging problem that has generated recently a lot of attention; see Web 2.0 [38]. For capturing interactions between Web components, we use active documents interacting with the rest of the world via streams of updates. Their input streams specify updates to the document (in the spirit of RSS feeds), whereas their output streams are defined by queries on the document. In most of the paper, the focus is on input streams where the updates are only insertions, although we do consider also deletions.
Serge Abiteboul, Pierre Bourhis, Bogdan Marinoiu
PODS3
2009 The AXML Artifact Model
abstract
Towards a data-centric workflow approach, we introduce an artifact model to capture data and workflow management activities in distributed settings. The model is built on Active XML, i.e., XML trees including Web service calls. We argue that the model captures the essential features of business artifacts as described informally in [A. Nigam and N. Caswell (2003)] or discussed in [R. Hull (2008)]. To illustrate, we briefly consider the monitoring of distributed systems and the verification of temporal properties for them.
Serge Abiteboul, Pierre Bourhis, Alban Galland, Bogdan Marinoiu
TIME4
2008 Distributed Monitoring of Peer-to-Peer Systems
abstract
Observing highly dynamic peer-to-peer systems is essential for many applications such as fault management or business processing. We demonstrate P2PMonitor, a P2P system for monitoring such systems. Alerters deployed on the monitored peers are designed to detect particular kinds of local events. They generate streams of XML data that form the primary sources of information for P2PMonitor. The core of the system is composed of processing components implementing the operators of an algebra over data streams. From a user viewpoint, monitoring a P2P system can be as simple as querying an XML document. The document is an ActiveXML document that aggregates a (possibly very large) number of streams generated by alerters on the monitored peers. Behind the scene, P2PMonitor compiles the monitoring query into a distributed monitoring plan, deploys alerters and stream algebra processors and issues notifications that are sent to users. The system functionalities are demonstrated by simulating the supply chain of a large company.
Serge Abiteboul, Bogdan Marinoiu, Pierre Bourhis
ICDE2