Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Vamshidhar Kommineni

dblp:47/7880 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › workload characterization
performance counter analysis
0.112009
Mining Health Models for Performance Monitoring of Services · ASE 2009
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance monitoring
0.112009
Mining Health Models for Performance Monitoring of Services · ASE 2009
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization
0.112009
Mining Health Models for Performance Monitoring of Services · ASE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

predeployment testing · 0.1data mining · 0.1clustering · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Mining Health Models for Performance Monitoring of Services
abstract
Online services such as search and live applications rely on large infrastructures in data centers, consisting of both stateless servers (e.g., web servers) and stateful servers (e.g., database servers). Acceptable performance of such infrastructures, and hence the availability of online services, rely on a very large number of parameters such as per-process resources and configurable system/application parameters. These parameters are available for collection as performance counters distributed across various machines, but services have had a hard time determining which performance counters to monitor and what thresholds to use for performance alarms in a production environment. In this paper, we present a novel framework called PerfAnalyzer, a storage-efficient and pro-active performance monitoring framework for correlating service health with performance counters. PerfAnalyzer automatically infers and builds health models for any service by running the standard suite of predeployment tests for the service and data mining the resulting performance counter data-set. A filtered set of performance counters and thresholds of alarms are produced by our framework. The health model inferred by our framework can then be used to detect performance degradation and collect detailed data for root-cause analysis in a production environment. We have applied PerfAnalyzer on five simple stress scenarios - CPU, memory, I/O, disk, and network, and two real system - Microsoft's SQL Server 2005 and IIS 7.0 Web Server, with promising results.
Mithun Acharya, Vamshidhar Kommineni
ASE2