Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Schmeier
dblp:47/815
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-3947-8226ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | MACAT - microarray chromosome analysis tool · Bioinform. 2005 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | DeePEL: Deep learning architecture to recognize p-lncRNA and e-lncRNA promotersabstractPromoter regions of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) genes are crucial to understand their transcriptional regulatory pattern. LncRNA genes, being more cryptic than protein-coding genes in terms of their functionality and biogenesis divergence, are lacking in number of existing studies to elucidate the roles of their promoters compared to their counterparts. Based on the overlap between epigenetic marks and transcription start sites, human lncRNAs were categorized into two broad categories: enhancer-originated lncRNAs (e-lncRNAs) and promoter-originated lncRNAs (p-lncRNAs) and hence these two groups are subject to distinct transcriptional regulatory programs. To understand the difference in the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms that governs p- and e-lncRNAs, we studied the promoter sequences of these two groups of lncRNAs including distinct transcription factor (TF) proteins that favor p-over e-lncRNA (and vice versa). In addition, we developed a convolution neural network (CNN) based deep learning (DL) framework DeePEL (deep p-, e-lncRNA promoter recognizer), to classify the promoter of p- and e-lncRNAs. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to classify these two groups of lncRNA promoters, using sequence and TF information, based on DL framework. We report several sequence specific signatures in the promoter regions as well as several distinct TFs specific to groups of lncRNAs that will help in understanding the promoter-proximal transcriptional regulation of p-lncRNAs and e-lncRNAs. Tanvir Alam, Mohammad Tariqul Islam 0002, Sebastian Schmeier, Mowafa Househ, Dena Al-Thani |
BIBM | 3 |
| 2005 | MACAT - microarray chromosome analysis toolabstractUNLABELLED: By linking differential gene expression to the chromosomal localization of genes, one can investigate microarray data for characteristic patterns of expression phenomena involving sizeable parts of specific chromosomes. We have implemented a statistical approach for identifying significantly differentially expressed chromosome regions. We demonstrate the applicability of the approach on a publicly available data set on acute lymphocytic leukemia. AVAILABILITY: The R-package MACAT can be obtained from http://www.compdiag.molgen.mpg.de/software/macat.shtml SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: http://www.compdiag.molgen.mpg.de/software/macat.shtml. Joern Toedling, Sebastian Schmeier, Matthias Heinig, Benjamin Georgi, Stefan Roepcke |
Bioinform. | 2 |