Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Victor Matvienko

dblp:48/11208 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 56% Image and video coding · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
image quality metric
0.212013
A Metric for the Evaluation of Dense Vector Field Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013
Visualization and visual analytics › scientific visualization › field visualization
vector field visualization
0.212013
A Metric for the Evaluation of Dense Vector Field Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013
Visualization and visual analytics
visualization evaluation
0.012013
A Metric for the Evaluation of Dense Vector Field Visualizations · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2gradient-based similarity · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 A Metric for the Evaluation of Dense Vector Field Visualizations
abstract
In this work, we present an intuitive image-quality metric that is derived from the motivation of DVF visualization. It utilizes the features of the resulting image and effectively measures the similarity between the output of the visualization method and the input flow data. We use the angle between the gradient direction and the original vector field as a measure of such similarity and the gradient magnitude as an importance measure. Our metric enables the automatic evaluation of images for a given vector field and allows the comparison of different methods, parameters sets, and quality improvement strategies for a specific vector field. By integrating the metric into the image-computation process, our approach can be used to generate improved images by choosing the best parameter set. To verify the effectiveness of our method, we conducted an extensive user study that demonstrated the metric’s applicability to various situations. For instance, our approach elucidated the robustness of a DVF visualization in the presence of data-altering filters, such as resampling.
Victor Matvienko, Jens H. Krüger
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.1
2012 Dense flow visualization using wave interference
abstract
Dense flow visualization and streamlines are among the most popular methods in numerous applications of scientific visualization. Because very few works synthesize the benefits of these approaches into one framework, we propose a hybrid technique. In this work, we present a novel method of dense flow visualization that produces high contrast images (typical of streamline approaches), with manageable spatial frequency. We begin by introducing a notion of a streamline thickness function and thickness wave sources, and then compute the resulting image as a coherent wave interference pattern. We show that this problem is equivalent to finding the dominant eigenvector of a sparse matrix and employ the power iterations numerical scheme to demonstrate an efficient parallel implementation. We conclude by discussing possible quality improvement strategies and extensions of our method to other domains, including 3D flows.
Victor Matvienko, Jens H. Krüger
PacificVis1