Roger P. Pawlowski

dblp:48/236 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2002-5577ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 4 · 2 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Trilinos: Enabling Scientific Computing across Diverse Hardware Architectures at Scale
abstract
Trilinos is a community-developed, open-source software framework that facilitates building large-scale, complex, multiscale, multiphysics simulation code bases for scientific and engineering problems. Since the Trilinos framework has undergone substantial changes to support new applications and new hardware architectures, this document is an update to “An Overview of the Trilinos project” by Heroux et al. (ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 31(3):397–423, 2005). It describes the design of Trilinos, introduces its new organization in product areas, and highlights established and new features available in Trilinos. Particular focus is put on the modernized software stack based on the Kokkos ecosystem to deliver performance portability across heterogeneous hardware architectures. This article also outlines the organization of the Trilinos community and the contribution model to help onboard interested users and contributors.
Matthias Mayr, Alexander Heinlein, Christian A. Glusa, Sivasankaran Rajamanickam, Maarten Arnst, Roscoe A. Bartlett, Luc Berger-Vergiat, Erik G. Bowman, Karen D. Devine, Graham Harper, Michael A. Heroux, Mark Hoemmen, Jonathan J. Hu, Brian Michael Kelley, Kyungjoo Kim, Drew P. Kouri, Paul Kuberry, Kim Liegeois, Curtis C. Ober, Roger P. Pawlowski, Carl Pearson, Mauro Perego, Eric T. Phipps, Denis Ridzal, Nathan V. Roberts, Christopher M. Siefert, Heidi Thornquist, Romin Tomasetti, Christian Trott, Ray S. Tuminaro, James M. Willenbring, Michael M. Wolf, Ichitaro Yamazaki
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.20
2022 Automatic Differentiation of C++ Codes on Emerging Manycore Architectures with Sacado
abstract
Automatic differentiation (AD) is a well-known technique for evaluating analytic derivatives of calculations implemented on a computer, with numerous software tools available for incorporating AD technology into complex applications. However, a growing challenge for AD is the efficient differentiation of parallel computations implemented on emerging manycore computing architectures such as multicore CPUs, GPUs, and accelerators as these devices become more pervasive. In this work, we explore forward mode, operator overloading-based differentiation of C++ codes on these architectures using the widely available Sacado AD software package. In particular, we leverage Kokkos, a C++ tool providing APIs for implementing parallel computations that is portable to a wide variety of emerging architectures. We describe the challenges that arise when differentiating code for these architectures using Kokkos, and two approaches for overcoming them that ensure optimal memory access patterns as well as expose additional dimensions of fine-grained parallelism in the derivative calculation. We describe the results of several computational experiments that demonstrate the performance of the approach on a few contemporary CPU and GPU architectures. We then conclude with applications of these techniques to the simulation of discretized systems of partial differential equations.
Eric T. Phipps, Roger P. Pawlowski, Christian Trott
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.2
2012 Graph-Based Software Design for Managing Complexity and Enabling Concurrency in Multiphysics PDE Software
abstract
Multiphysics simulation software is plagued by complexity stemming from nonlinearly coupled systems of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). Such software typically supports many models, which may require different transport equations, constitutive laws, and equations of state. Strong coupling and a multiplicity of models leads to complex algorithms (i.e., the properly ordered sequence of steps to assemble a discretized set of coupled PDEs) and rigid software. This work presents a design strategy that shifts focus away from high-level algorithmic concerns to low-level data dependencies. Mathematical expressions are represented as software objects that directly expose data dependencies. The entire system of expressions forms a directed acyclic graph and the high-level assembly algorithm is generated automatically through standard graph algorithms. This approach makes problems with complex dependencies entirely tractable, and removes virtually all logic from the algorithm itself. Changes are highly localized, allowing developers to implement models without detailed understanding of any algorithms (i.e., the overall assembly process). Furthermore, this approach complements existing MPI-based frameworks and can be implemented within them easily. Finally, this approach enables algorithmic parallelization via threads. By exposing dependencies in the algorithm explicitly, thread-based parallelism is implemented through algorithm decomposition, providing a basis for exploiting parallelism independent from domain decomposition approaches.
Patrick K. Notz, Roger P. Pawlowski, James C. Sutherland
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.2
2005 An overview of the Trilinos project
abstract
The Trilinos Project is an effort to facilitate the design, development, integration, and ongoing support of mathematical software libraries within an object-oriented framework for the solution of large-scale, complex multiphysics engineering and scientific problems. Trilinos addresses two fundamental issues of developing software for these problems: (i) providing a streamlined process and set of tools for development of new algorithmic implementations and (ii) promoting interoperability of independently developed software.Trilinos uses a two-level software structure designed around collections of packages . A Trilinos package is an integral unit usually developed by a small team of experts in a particular algorithms area such as algebraic preconditioners, nonlinear solvers, etc. Packages exist underneath the Trilinos top level, which provides a common look-and-feel, including configuration, documentation, licensing, and bug-tracking.Here we present the overall Trilinos design, describing our use of abstract interfaces and default concrete implementations. We discuss the services that Trilinos provides to a prospective package and how these services are used by various packages. We also illustrate how packages can be combined to rapidly develop new algorithms. Finally, we discuss how Trilinos facilitates high-quality software engineering practices that are increasingly required from simulation software.
Michael A. Heroux, Roscoe A. Bartlett, Victoria E. Howle, Robert J. Hoekstra, Jonathan J. Hu, Tamara G. Kolda, Richard B. Lehoucq, Kevin R. Long, Roger P. Pawlowski, Eric T. Phipps, Andrew G. Salinger, Heidi Thornquist, Ray S. Tuminaro, James M. Willenbring, Alan B. Williams, Kendall S. Stanley
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.9