Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean-Claude Derniame

dblp:48/3962 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.011998
Component-based Software Process Support · ASE 1998
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process modeling
0.011998
Component-based Software Process Support · ASE 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

component-based design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1998 Component-based Software Process Support
abstract
Only recently has the research community started to consider how to make software process models interoperable and reusable. The task is difficult Software processes are inherently creative and dynamic difficult to define and repeat at an enactable level of detail. Additionally, interoperability and reusability have not been considered important issues. Recent interoperability and reusability solutions advocate the development of standard process model representations based on common concepts or generic schemas, which are used as a basis for translating between heterogeneous process representations. The authors propose an alternative approach through the development of process-based components. They present the Open Process Components Framework, a component based framework for software process modeling. In this approach, process models are constructed as sets of components which interact in meaningful ways. Interoperability and reuse are obtained through encapsulation of process representations, an explicit representation of process state, and an extendable set of class relationships.
Kevin Gary, Timothy E. Lindquist, Harry Koehnemann, Jean-Claude Derniame
ASE4
1990 Modeling and enacting software processes: an analysis
abstract
Previous studies have led to a better understanding of the nature, the characteristics, and the implications of software process modeling and enacting. The authors attempt to reap the benefits of this better understanding, through an analysis of what should be a complete assisted development, in order to deduce a rich set of requirements and facilities for software process modeling and enacting, and to highlight and discuss some essential issues for the improvement of present proposals in the field of model driven IPSEs (integrated project support environments). Three well-known prototypes of assisted environments are examined: TRIAD/CML for the imperative approach, Marvel for the rule-based approach, and IPSE 2.5 for the object-oriented approach. Finally, the authors emphasize essential issues for future third-generation IPSEs: these new IPSEs must be real IPSEs, they must provide multiform assistance and cope with different kinds of processes including complex ones, and they must take into account dynamic evolution of software process models.>
Jacques Lonchamp, Khalid Benali, Claude Godart, Jean-Claude Derniame
COMPSAC4
1989 Structure design of distributed systems using interpreted Petri nets
abstract
An approach is presented to internal structure design of distributed systems in the field of process control. Starting from an IPN (interpreted Petri net) specifying the external behavior of a system, the approach (based on a set of decomposition rules) allows a systematic construction of structure specification, thus making unnecessary the consistency verification usually employed in top-down design methods. It is shown that the decomposition rules presented allow systematic construction of the internal structure of distributed systems. These rules free the designer from specifying intermodule cooperation and from verifying consistency between the external behavior and the internal structure specification.>
Joachim Tankoano, Jean-Claude Derniame
COMPSAC2