Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Holger Dinkel

dblp:48/522 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0002-9316-5204ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › motif discovery
protein motif discovery
0.112007
A computational strategy for the prediction of functional linear peptide motifs in proteins · Bioinform. 2007
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein-protein interaction
0.012007
A computational strategy for the prediction of functional linear peptide motifs in proteins · Bioinform. 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence filters · 0.1sequence conservation scoring · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Ten Simple Rules for Organizing an Unconference
abstract
An academic conference is a traditional platform for researchers and professionals to network and learn about recent developments and trends in a particular academic field [1–4]. Typically, the organizing committees and sponsors decide the main theme and sub-topics of the conference and select the presenters based on peer-reviewed papers [5]. The selected speakers usually share their research with a large audience by means of presentations and posters. However, the most stimulating discussions generally take place over coffee breaks when attendees can interact with each other and discuss various topics, including their own research interests, in a more informal manner [1, 6, 7], while expanding their own professional networks. An emphasis on facilitating such informal/networking interactions is a central focus of “unconventional conferences”—or “unconferences.”
Aidan Budd, Holger Dinkel, Manuel Corpas, Jonathan C. Fuller, Laura Rubinat-Ripoll, Damien Devos, Pierre H. Khoueiry, Konrad U. Förstner, Fotis Georgatos, Francis Rowland, Malvika Sharan, Janos X. Binder, Tom Grace, Karyn Traphagen, Adam Gristwood, Natasha T. Wood
PLoS Comput. Biol.2
2007 A computational strategy for the prediction of functional linear peptide motifs in proteins
abstract
MOTIVATION: Short linear peptide motifs mediate protein-protein interaction, cell compartment targeting and represent the sites of post-translational modification. The identification of functional motifs by conventional sequence searches, however, is hampered by the short length of the motifs resulting in a large number of hits of which only a small portion is functional. RESULTS: We have developed a procedure for the identification of functional motifs, which scores pattern conservation in homologous sequences by taking explicitly into account the sequence similarity to the query sequence. For a further improvement of this method, sequence filters have been optimized to mask those sequence regions containing little or no linear motifs. The performance of this approach was verified by measuring its ability to identify 576 experimentally validated motifs among a total of 15 563 instances in a set of 415 protein sequences. Compared to a random selection procedure, the joint application of sequence filters and the novel scoring scheme resulted in a 9-fold enrichment of validated functional motifs on the first rank. In addition, only half as many hits need to be investigated to recover 75% of the functional instances in our dataset. Therefore, this motif-scoring approach should be helpful to guide experiments because it allows focusing on those short linear peptide motifs that have a high probability to be functional.
Holger Dinkel, Heinrich Sticht
Bioinform.1