Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Radhika Niranjan Mysore

dblp:48/7546 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0004-6708-2167ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 8 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
8 papers
Performance modeling and evaluation · 29% Memory systems · 26% Cloud and datacenter computing · 24%
Computer networks
7 papers
Network management and operations · 48% Internet of things and sensor networks · 24% Datacenter networks · 20%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Memory systems › memory disaggregation
far memory
0.912025
Eden: Developer-Friendly Application-Integrated Far Memory · NSDI 2025
Network management and operations › fault management
fault diagnosis
0.822023
Murphy: Performance Diagnosis of Distributed Cloud Applications · SIGCOMM 2023
Gestalt: Fast, Unified Fault Localization for Networked Systems · USENIX ATC 2014
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance diagnosis
0.712023
Murphy: Performance Diagnosis of Distributed Cloud Applications · SIGCOMM 2023
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › network diagnosis
latency diagnosis
0.612022
How to diagnose nanosecond network latencies in rich end-host stacks · NSDI 2022
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
datacenter network topology
0.412019
Understanding Lifecycle Management Complexity of Datacenter Topologies · NSDI 2019
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource disaggregation
datacenter resource disaggregation
0.312025
Eden: Developer-Friendly Application-Integrated Far Memory · NSDI 2025
Datacenter networks
data center network topology
0.212015
Condor: Better Topologies Through Declarative Design · SIGCOMM 2015
Network management and operations › fault management › fault diagnosis
fault localization
0.212014
Gestalt: Fast, Unified Fault Localization for Networked Systems · USENIX ATC 2014
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.212013
TritonSort: A Balanced and Energy-Efficient Large-Scale Sorting System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Cloud and datacenter computing › multi-tenancy
multi-tenant datacenter
0.212013
FasTrak: enabling express lanes in multi-tenant data centers · CoNEXT 2013
Performance modeling and evaluation › benchmarking › algorithm benchmarking
sort benchmark
0.212013
TritonSort: A Balanced and Energy-Efficient Large-Scale Sorting System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Network management and operations › configuration management
network configuration management
0.112019
Understanding Lifecycle Management Complexity of Datacenter Topologies · NSDI 2019
Routing and switching › switching
layer-2 routing
0.112009
PortLand: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric · SIGCOMM 2009
Network optimization and economics
network design
0.112015
Condor: Better Topologies Through Declarative Design · SIGCOMM 2015
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.112014
Gestalt: Fast, Unified Fault Localization for Networked Systems · USENIX ATC 2014
Storage systems › magnetic storage
disk storage
0.012013
TritonSort: A Balanced and Energy-Efficient Large-Scale Sorting System · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2013
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter architecture
virtualized datacenter
0.012009
PortLand: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric · SIGCOMM 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

causal inference · 1.3fault localization · 0.4hardware rule management · 0.3flow caching · 0.3constraint-based synthesis · 0.2scale-out architecture · 0.2cross-resource balance · 0.2pipelining · 0.1merge sort · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Eden: Developer-Friendly Application-Integrated Far Memory
Anil Yelam, Stewart Grant, Saarth Deshpande, Nadav Amit, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Amy Ousterhout, Marcos K. Aguilera, Alex C. Snoeren
NSDI5
2023 Murphy: Performance Diagnosis of Distributed Cloud Applications
abstract
Modern cloud-based applications have complex inter-dependencies on both distributed application components as well as network infrastructure, making it difficult to reason about their performance. As a result, a rich body of work seeks to automate performance diagnosis of enterprise networks and such cloud applications. However, existing methods either ignore inter-dependencies which results in poor accuracy, or require causal acyclic dependencies which cannot model common enterprise environments.
Vipul Harsh, Wenxuan Zhou 0003, Sachin Ashok, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Brighten Godfrey, Sujata Banerjee
SIGCOMM4
2022 How to diagnose nanosecond network latencies in rich end-host stacks
Roni Haecki, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Lalith Suresh 0001, Gerd Zellweger, Bo Gan, Timothy Merrifield, Sujata Banerjee, Timothy Roscoe
NSDI2
2019 Understanding Lifecycle Management Complexity of Datacenter Topologies
Mingyang Zhang 0005, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Sucha Supittayapornpong, Ramesh Govindan
NSDI2
2015 Condor: Better Topologies Through Declarative Design
abstract
The design space for large, multipath datacenter networks is large and complex, and no one design fits all purposes. Network architects must trade off many criteria to design cost-effective, reliable, and maintainable networks, and typically cannot explore much of the design space. We present Condor, our approach to enabling a rapid, efficient design cycle. Condor allows architects to express their requirements as constraints via a Topology Description Language (TDL), rather than having to directly specify network structures. Condor then uses constraint-based synthesis to rapidly generate candidate topologies, which can be analyzed against multiple criteria. We show that TDL supports concise descriptions of topologies such as fat-trees, BCube, and DCell; that we can generate known and novel variants of fat-trees with simple changes to a TDL file; and that we can synthesize large topologies in tens of seconds. We also show that Condor supports the daunting task of designing multi-phase network expansions that can be carried out on live networks.
Brandon Schlinker, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Jeffrey C. Mogul, Amin Vahdat, Minlan Yu, Ethan Katz-Bassett, Michael Rubin
SIGCOMM2
2014 Gestalt: Fast, Unified Fault Localization for Networked Systems
Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Ratul Mahajan, Amin Vahdat, George Varghese
USENIX ATC1
2013 FasTrak: enabling express lanes in multi-tenant data centers
abstract
The shared nature of multi-tenant cloud networks requires providing tenant isolation and quality of service, which in turn requires enforcing thousands of network-level rules, policies, and traffic rate limits. Enforcing these rules in virtual machine hypervisors imposes significant computational overhead, as well as increased latency. In FasTrak, we seek to exploit temporal locality in flows and flow sizes to offload a subset of network virtualization functionality from the hypervisor into switch hardware freeing up the hypervisor. FasTrak manages the required hardware and hypervisor rules as a unified set, moving rules back and forth to minimize the overhead of network virtualization, and focusing on flows (or flow aggregates) that are either most latency sensitive or exhibit the highest packets-per-second rates.
Radhika Niranjan Mysore, George Porter, Amin Vahdat
CoNEXT1
2013 TritonSort: A Balanced and Energy-Efficient Large-Scale Sorting System
abstract
We present TritonSort, a highly efficient, scalable sorting system. It is designed to process large datasets, and has been evaluated against as much as 100TB of input data spread across 832 disks in 52 nodes at a rate of 0.938TB/min. When evaluated against the annual Indy GraySort sorting benchmark, TritonSort is 66% better in absolute performance and has over six times the per-node throughput of the previous record holder. When evaluated against the 100TB Indy JouleSort benchmark, TritonSort sorted 9703 records/Joule. In this article, we describe the hardware and software architecture necessary to operate TritonSort at this level of efficiency. Through careful management of system resources to ensure cross-resource balance, we are able to sort data at approximately 80% of the disks’ aggregate sequential write speed. We believe the work holds a number of lessons for balanced system design and for scale-out architectures in general. While many interesting systems are able to scale linearly with additional servers, per-server performance can lag behind per-server capacity by more than an order of magnitude. Bridging the gap between high scalability and high performance would enable either significantly less expensive systems that are able to do the same work or provide the ability to address significantly larger problem sets with the same infrastructure.
Alexander Rasmussen, George Porter, Michael Conley, Harsha V. Madhyastha, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Alexander Pucher, Amin Vahdat
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.5
2011 ALIAS: scalable, decentralized label assignment for data centers
abstract
Modern data centers can consist of hundreds of thousands of servers and millions of virtualized end hosts. Managing address assignment while simultaneously enabling scalable communication is a challenge in such an environment. We present ALIAS, an addressing and communication protocol that automates topology discovery and address assignment for the hierarchical topologies that underlie many data center network fabrics. Addresses assigned by ALIAS interoperate with a variety of scalable communication techniques. ALIAS is fully decentralized, scales to large network sizes, and dynamically recovers from arbitrary failures, without requiring modifications to hosts or to commodity switch hardware. We demonstrate through simulation that ALIAS quickly and correctly configures networks that support up to hundreds of thousands of hosts, even in the face of failures and erroneous cabling, and we show that ALIAS is a practical solution for auto-configuration with our NetFPGA testbed implementation.
Meg Walraed-Sullivan, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Malveeka Tewari, Ying Zhang 0022, Keith Marzullo, Amin Vahdat
SoCC2
2011 TritonSort: A Balanced Large-Scale Sorting System
Alexander Rasmussen, George Porter, Michael Conley, Harsha V. Madhyastha, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Alexander Pucher, Amin Vahdat
NSDI5
2011 Brief Announcement: A Randomized Algorithm for Label Assignment in Dynamic Networks
Meg Walraed-Sullivan, Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Keith Marzullo, Amin Vahdat
DISC2
2009 PortLand: a scalable fault-tolerant layer 2 data center network fabric
abstract
This paper considers the requirements for a scalable, easily manageable, fault-tolerant, and efficient data center network fabric. Trends in multi-core processors, end-host virtualization, and commodities of scale are pointing to future single-site data centers with millions of virtual end points. Existing layer 2 and layer 3 network protocols face some combination of limitations in such a setting: lack of scalability, difficult management, inflexible communication, or limited support for virtual machine migration. To some extent, these limitations may be inherent for Ethernet/IP style protocols when trying to support arbitrary topologies. We observe that data center networks are often managed as a single logical network fabric with a known baseline topology and growth model. We leverage this observation in the design and implementation of PortLand, a scalable, fault tolerant layer 2 routing and forwarding protocol for data center environments. Through our implementation and evaluation, we show that PortLand holds promise for supporting a ``plug-and-play" large-scale, data center network.
Radhika Niranjan Mysore, Andreas Pamboris, Nathan Farrington, Nelson Huang, Pardis Miri, Sivasankar Radhakrishnan, Vikram Subramanya, Amin Vahdat
SIGCOMM1